Jake, Neytiri et leurs enfants vivent paisiblement dans leur tribu, jusqu'au jour où leur vie est menacée par des humains transformés en Na'vi. Afin d'éviter la vengeance du colonel Quaritch... Tout lireJake, Neytiri et leurs enfants vivent paisiblement dans leur tribu, jusqu'au jour où leur vie est menacée par des humains transformés en Na'vi. Afin d'éviter la vengeance du colonel Quaritch, ils décident de fuir ailleurs sur Pandora.Jake, Neytiri et leurs enfants vivent paisiblement dans leur tribu, jusqu'au jour où leur vie est menacée par des humains transformés en Na'vi. Afin d'éviter la vengeance du colonel Quaritch, ils décident de fuir ailleurs sur Pandora.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- A remporté 1 oscar
- 73 victoires et 152 nominations au total
7,5553.4K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'Avatar: The Way of Water' is lauded for its breathtaking visuals, innovative technology, and rich world-building. It delves into themes of family, responsibility, and environmentalism. However, some critics point out a repetitive plot, insufficient character development, and pacing problems. A few find the story predictable and emotionally shallow compared to the original. Despite these drawbacks, many appreciate the film for its visual grandeur and thrilling action scenes.
Avis en vedette
BORING
What's worse than watching a boring movie? Knowing there will be at least three more boring movies the franchise will release over the next few years just to appease Cameron's narcissism. It's a story filled with cliched tropes and regurgitated plot lines. You might as well watch it with the sound off. Does the movie really need to be 3-plus hours long? No, it doesn't. Perhaps Disney chose to combine films #2 and #3 and will do the same for films #4 and #5 -- and films #6 and #7 -- because they know nobody wants to watch seven Avatar sequels. (You'll just have to watch four VERY LONG AND BORING sequels. Good grief.
5Vin_
Great visuals but lacking a storyline.
Movie exceeds all the CGI anyone can possibly expect, but the storyline fails to overwhelm the audience. Id say 70% of the film is about family bonding and descriptions of culture on Pandora. Had it been on Discovery or Nat Geo, itd have been awesome. But thats not what people going in to watch the movie would want to see in a 3 hr movie.
The action starts out at the beginning and in the end with detailsed description of the life of the Naavi comprising the major chunk of the film in the middle.
Personally I was unable to sit through the movie in one go. Finished it in 3 sittings while skipping through many scenes I felt were totally unnecessary.
The action starts out at the beginning and in the end with detailsed description of the life of the Naavi comprising the major chunk of the film in the middle.
Personally I was unable to sit through the movie in one go. Finished it in 3 sittings while skipping through many scenes I felt were totally unnecessary.
Most part felt like watching a sequence from National Geographic
Without question, this has the best CG works I have seen in recent movies.. Visuals are outstanding.. Underwater sequences and the fight scenes felt very real.. And that's all to it.. Just because it's a visual masterpiece, I cannot spend continuous 12-15 minutes just watching the underwater animals.. It felt like watching some episode from National Geographic or Animal planet..
Overall, if you cut 30-40 mins of such parts, you will still not miss anything in the story line.. First half was mostly to setup the environment and was very lagging .. I was like ,"Okay.. I get it.. it's a great place with different creatures.. Now, please move on to the storyline..".. Climax fight portion was good but not as great as the Avatar 2009 climax fight.. After the fight we still get some 5-10 mins of lagging scenes.. "Come on ... Finish it already"...
A major plot hole that I would think of is the reason for the presence of humans on Pandora.. What happened to the reason from part 1?! And why all these unnecessary hunting of someone who already fled the fight?!
To watch this movie in cinemas and experience it is an one time opportunity in life, provided you can bear the portions which makes you feel like sitting inside a boring science class...
Overall, if you cut 30-40 mins of such parts, you will still not miss anything in the story line.. First half was mostly to setup the environment and was very lagging .. I was like ,"Okay.. I get it.. it's a great place with different creatures.. Now, please move on to the storyline..".. Climax fight portion was good but not as great as the Avatar 2009 climax fight.. After the fight we still get some 5-10 mins of lagging scenes.. "Come on ... Finish it already"...
A major plot hole that I would think of is the reason for the presence of humans on Pandora.. What happened to the reason from part 1?! And why all these unnecessary hunting of someone who already fled the fight?!
To watch this movie in cinemas and experience it is an one time opportunity in life, provided you can bear the portions which makes you feel like sitting inside a boring science class...
Not his best shot
The visual effects are amazing. But Cameron should be better than this.
I'm a big fan of Mr Cameron. Not only for his directing skills, but also for his screenwriting skills. But this time he seemed to have missed the goal. I know he rarely does sequels. But is this the best he could do? The story has not changed anything compared to the previous episode. Repeated crises, repeated enemies, repeated conflicts,and wait a minute,WHAT? Even repeated Titanic. Are you serious?
As a director, he also did not reach his previous level. For a long time, the pace of the film felt too slow. Yes, the underwater scenes are phenomenal. But this is not the Blue Planet, this is a sci-fi action movie. At least it's what most audiences expect from the film, isn't it?
I'm a big fan of Mr Cameron. Not only for his directing skills, but also for his screenwriting skills. But this time he seemed to have missed the goal. I know he rarely does sequels. But is this the best he could do? The story has not changed anything compared to the previous episode. Repeated crises, repeated enemies, repeated conflicts,and wait a minute,WHAT? Even repeated Titanic. Are you serious?
As a director, he also did not reach his previous level. For a long time, the pace of the film felt too slow. Yes, the underwater scenes are phenomenal. But this is not the Blue Planet, this is a sci-fi action movie. At least it's what most audiences expect from the film, isn't it?
Visually beautiful but excessively long and convoluted.
James Cameron does it again. Creates a beautiful, vibrant world with a basic, paint by numbers plot. If someone had stepped in and cut this movie an hour shorter, we might have been okay but instead I was getting bored, checked my watch and saw I still had 45 minutes to go.
Is the world beautiful? Yes, absolutely. Does the adjusted frame rate work? No, action scenes feel like a cut scene from a video game. How's the story? Mediocre. The overarching story gets lost and forgotten because James Cameron wants to paint the whole world. As he does that, he fills it in with random cliché side plots to distract you until you remember, oh yeah, there's a big bad villain out there. The story feels like something my 6 year old niece would write. Bouncing from one thought to the next.
Rough synopsis: Oh the *Insert character/Group* is in trouble! Lets go save them. How could you do that? You know better. Here's a beautiful CGI thing to look at. Rinse/repeat.
Major themes carry over from the first one. Humanity is bad except for "our" white savior. He's the good guy. Here's a new group of Navi that don't trust us at first but they'll come around after a scary moment.
The story feels like Cameron kept adding on one story trope after another and no one walked into the room to knock the pen out of his hand. If you end up watching it, do yourself a favor and get up to pee halfway through. Grab some popcorn and a drink. Maybe taking a break from Pandora will make it not so insufferably long.
Is the world beautiful? Yes, absolutely. Does the adjusted frame rate work? No, action scenes feel like a cut scene from a video game. How's the story? Mediocre. The overarching story gets lost and forgotten because James Cameron wants to paint the whole world. As he does that, he fills it in with random cliché side plots to distract you until you remember, oh yeah, there's a big bad villain out there. The story feels like something my 6 year old niece would write. Bouncing from one thought to the next.
Rough synopsis: Oh the *Insert character/Group* is in trouble! Lets go save them. How could you do that? You know better. Here's a beautiful CGI thing to look at. Rinse/repeat.
Major themes carry over from the first one. Humanity is bad except for "our" white savior. He's the good guy. Here's a new group of Navi that don't trust us at first but they'll come around after a scary moment.
The story feels like Cameron kept adding on one story trope after another and no one walked into the room to knock the pen out of his hand. If you end up watching it, do yourself a favor and get up to pee halfway through. Grab some popcorn and a drink. Maybe taking a break from Pandora will make it not so insufferably long.
Blocage sonore
Prévisualisez la bande originale ici et continuez à écouter sur Amazon Music.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAccording to James Cameron, Kate Winslet performed all of her underwater stunts herself.
- GaffesThe main characters leave their home village so that the bad guys coming after them will no longer target the village. But the bad guys don't know any of this, and no effort is made to tell them. This defeats the stated purpose of leaving.
- Générique farfeluThe first half of the end credits highlight Pandoran sea creatures.
- Autres versionsLike its predecessor, which is presented in a 1.78:1 aspect ratio, this film presents in the slightly wider ratio of 1.85:1. There are no scope versions of this film, as James Cameron intended it to be seen in full frame.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Animat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Watching the Weird Way of Water (2022)
- Bandes originalesNothing Is Lost (You Give Me Strength)
Performed by The Weeknd
Lyrics and Melody by The Weeknd (as Abel "The Weekend" Tesfaye)
Music by Simon Franglen and Swedish House Mafia
Produced by Simon Franglen and Swedish House Mafia
The Weeknd Performs Courtesy of XO/Republic Records
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Avatar: The Way of Water
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 350 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 688 459 501 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 134 100 226 $ US
- 18 déc. 2022
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 2 343 096 253 $ US
- Durée
- 3h 12m(192 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant




