ÉVALUATION IMDb
8,2/10
80 k
MA NOTE
Ce documentaire examine de près les éléments qui ont mené à la crise financière de 2008.Ce documentaire examine de près les éléments qui ont mené à la crise financière de 2008.Ce documentaire examine de près les éléments qui ont mené à la crise financière de 2008.
- A remporté 1 oscar
- 8 victoires et 27 nominations au total
Matt Damon
- Self - Narrator
- (voice)
Lee Hsien Loong
- Self - Prime Minister, Singapore
- (as Hsien Loong Lee)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesOn being interviewed about this film, Henry Rollins likened Charles Ferguson's interviewing technique to "tightening the screws little by little until the interviewee starts to say "Ow.....ow.....ow and then, Stop the camera!"
- GaffesThe first time Paul Volcker's last name is shown it is written "Vocker".
- Citations
Andrew Sheng: Why should a financial engineer be paid four times to 100 times more than a real engineer? A real engineer build bridges. A financial engineer build dreams. And, you know, when those dreams turn out to be nightmares, other people pay for it
- Autres versionsWhen broadcast in the UK on BBC TV (as part of its Storyville documentary strand) in December 2011, on-screen dates of the speakers' positions were updated, notably Dominique Strauss-Kahn who resigned from the IMF in May 2011.
- ConnexionsFeatured in At the Movies: Cannes Film Festival 2010 (2010)
Commentaire en vedette
There is no possible way that all of the contributors to the financial meltdown can get adequate attention in a two-hour documentary. There were many factors involved, and some get short shrift in the film to focus on what would be easily comprehensible by most viewers, and, one can safely assume, to fit the biases of the producers, director, writers, etc. It's their movie, after all, and no documentary can avoid the bias trap. None that I have seen anyway.
Think of the film as a departure point. If one is really interested, they will dig deeper into the question through other documentaries and books on the subject. There will be plenty in the years ahead. More evidence will come to light, and more questions will be answered.
Let it be said that this film will make you angry. It will also make you a more informed individual and a better citizen.
It is not easy to get through two hours of discussion on why the financial meltdown occurred, but this film is probably the most painless way to do it. and it did it very well.
Think of the film as a departure point. If one is really interested, they will dig deeper into the question through other documentaries and books on the subject. There will be plenty in the years ahead. More evidence will come to light, and more questions will be answered.
Let it be said that this film will make you angry. It will also make you a more informed individual and a better citizen.
It is not easy to get through two hours of discussion on why the financial meltdown occurred, but this film is probably the most painless way to do it. and it did it very well.
- lastliberal-853-253708
- 29 mars 2011
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Inside Job?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Cuộc Khủng Hoảng Kinh Tế
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 2 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 4 312 735 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 39 649 $ US
- 10 oct. 2010
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 7 871 522 $ US
- Durée1 heure 49 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant