ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,6/10
25 k
MA NOTE
Une jeune fille essaie de comprendre comment elle a mystérieusement acquis le pouvoir de mettre le feu aux choses avec son esprit.Une jeune fille essaie de comprendre comment elle a mystérieusement acquis le pouvoir de mettre le feu aux choses avec son esprit.Une jeune fille essaie de comprendre comment elle a mystérieusement acquis le pouvoir de mettre le feu aux choses avec son esprit.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 7 nominations au total
4,625.1K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
Most Average Movie to Ever Average
Lately when I watch a new movie, I ask myself "how would this movie be without it's special effects?". Too many movies get by on shiney and sparkley colors on the screen for a large part of the movie.
If you do that here, you don't even have an average movie.
What happened to Hollywood in terms of smart writing? I'd throw acting in there too, but I think it's unfair to judge actors when they have the scripts and writing they're dealing with now. I'm not even sure how they can say many of the lines with a straight face, so that's impressive I guess.
If you literally have nothing else to do, this would be ok to have on in the background.
If you do that here, you don't even have an average movie.
What happened to Hollywood in terms of smart writing? I'd throw acting in there too, but I think it's unfair to judge actors when they have the scripts and writing they're dealing with now. I'm not even sure how they can say many of the lines with a straight face, so that's impressive I guess.
If you literally have nothing else to do, this would be ok to have on in the background.
Didn't Start the Fire
Firestarter 2022 is not a total fail but nothing remarkable or at least entertaining - forced at gunpoint to decide, I would prefer to watch again the version from 1984 starring Drew Barrymore. No, I am not a great fan of that one either but it is the more entertaining one of both movies. The new version just rolls on and I watched the whole affair rather indifferently. The technical aspects (acting, cam, production) are okay, but if you know the old version I do not know why one should watch the new one. On the horror-o-meter this one is also a very low one. Final word: redundant.
Pretty bad when a rehashed John Carpenter score is the best thing about it.
I grew up on the Drew Barrymore version. And it was okay for its time. I still remember Heather Locklear and the ironing board. I remember the creepy nature of George C. Scott. And the barn climax.
This movie I can barely recall and I just finished it. Oh yeah, I lost interest at the cat part with Zac Efron saying "good job"....what the actual huh?!
I think this movie just petered out. It's unnecessary, generic, shallow and adds nothing at all.
Watch a yule log on youtube instead.
This movie I can barely recall and I just finished it. Oh yeah, I lost interest at the cat part with Zac Efron saying "good job"....what the actual huh?!
I think this movie just petered out. It's unnecessary, generic, shallow and adds nothing at all.
Watch a yule log on youtube instead.
An insult to the original
Very poor, poor effects, poor story, cheesy, so disappointed with this. If you are going to remake a cult classic, then have a look at what made it a classic to start. This is just a lifeless boring sham. If you loved the original film, give this a miss, if you haven't seen the original, then it might just about keep you awake.
More faithful they said...
I should have known better than to be the least bit excited for this. This was bad. The original, was one of my favorite movies when I was young. I was hoping they improved on that. I don't know why. With the exception of Dune (as that's all that comes to mind right now) remakes have traditionally been bad, overall. I don't know why I thought this would be any different. They did very little marketing before it was out. Which is usually an indication that they don't even have faith in their own movie. I should have known better.
Stephen King Movie Adaptations, Ranked
Stephen King Movie Adaptations, Ranked
See how every feature film adaptation of Stephen King's work stacks up, according to IMDb ratings.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesJohn Carpenter, who did the music for this film, was set to direct the original Charlie (1984), but was replaced when his previous film, L'effroyable chose (1982), failed at the box office. He would instead direct another Stephen King adaptation, Christine (1983).
- GaffesWhen Charlie is in the woods trying to aim her abilities at firewood, you can see someone walking by in the background. She is clearly not alone and would've been seen.
- Citations
Vicky McGee: [to Rainbird] How can you be still helping them after everything they've done to you?
- ConnexionsFeatured in Amanda the Jedi Show: FIRESTARTER is a Trash Fire | Explained (2022)
- Bandes originalesControl, I'm Here
Written by Douglas McCarthy, Bon Harris
Performed by Nitzer Ebb
Published by Mute Song Limited by arrangement with Bank Robber Music, LLC
Courtesy of Geffen Records under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Firestarter?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 12 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 9 739 250 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 3 827 715 $ US
- 15 mai 2022
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 15 039 250 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 34m(94 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant







