Battle Over Britain

I'm sat watching now.

As a film, as a concept of bringing back the Classic British War Film, it's a great attempt. Not a blockbuster, not a study in of human endeavour in any real depth, just a story and a scenario of RAF Pilots 'doing their jobs'.

There is some plotline of sorts revolving around a competition of kills for a prize pot, the main driver of the competition being a bluff Yorkshireman (accent like Sean Bean) who has a cold exterior of a personality, not particularly likeable.

In short, it's ok, 1hr 20 min, and actually worth the time. Makes a change to see a film in slow burn mode and not to be bashed around the head with multi plot line set-ups to be able to play the last 20 mins punchline.

Give it a go.

I have seen parts of this movie and it is just as bad as the Masters of the Skies series.

Guys sitting in there Spifires in perfectly starched suits flying straight lines while in combat.

Really is this the new norm of Hollywood movie making.

Flying straight line in active combat airspace is a deathwish to be fullfilled.

Every enemy gun will have zero trouble of shooting you down.

And the ammount of CGI is again everywhere.

And then I'm not even talking about the highschool level acting of the actors.

My advice would be to find, Battle over Brittian from 1969 and get a much better feeling how it was over the skies of Southern England during WWII and how close England got to be defeated by the Luftwaffe.

I have already deleted this movie from my collection because I will not insult the brave airmen that gave their lives during this horrible conflict by owning a copy of this abomination.

I try to watch every war movie out there, and most of them are ok - even the low budget ones make an attempt at plot, CGI, and action: this one does none of the above.

-Week to no plot; -Minimal if any use of CGI; -"Battle over Britain"? I never saw any battles;

The cockpit death scenes are unconvincing: where's the blood? How did the pilots get shot? In one scene we simply see a splash of crimson, done.

The movie blatantly uses the same tired aircraft over and over - check out the registration of the "new delivery" Spitfire if you don't believe me. Plus the movie has the same arial clips over and over.

Don't waste your time on this garbage. Spitfire exploitation I call it. The producers are taking advantage of the plethora of rebuilt war planes out there, which is great - but this movie ain't.

"Battle Over Britain" attempts to capture the intensity and heroism of World War II aviation but ultimately falters due to its glaring technical flaws, lackluster production values, and uninspired direction.

Visually, the film struggles with immersion. The cinematography is static and uninventive, failing to convey the dynamism of aerial combat. The dogfights, a crucial element in any war film centered on pilots, lack urgency and realism. Instead of sweeping camera movements and pulse-pounding aerial choreography, we get rigid, repetitive shots that resemble outdated flight simulation footage. The overuse of CGI, particularly in battle scenes, only exacerbates this issue, as the digital effects are glaringly unconvincing and fail to blend seamlessly with live-action sequences.

The production design is minimal to the point of distraction. The film's airbase setting is astonishingly sparse, consisting of a single Spitfire (which inexplicably serves multiple pilots), a makeshift shed doubling as squadron headquarters, and barely any support vehicles or personnel. The absence of crucial wartime details-such as proper refueling, rearming procedures, or even period-accurate uniforms-further strips the film of authenticity. These omissions make the film feel less like a historical drama and more like a low-budget reenactment.

The acting, while occasionally competent, is often wooden and lacks the gravitas needed for a war epic. Many performances feel modern and out of place, failing to capture the discipline and demeanor of 1940s RAF pilots. Dialogue is stilted, with prolonged, uneventful conversations that add little to character development or dramatic tension. The emotional weight of war-fear, camaraderie, and loss-is barely conveyed, leaving scenes that should be gripping feeling lifeless and mechanical.

Perhaps the most egregious failure is in storytelling. The film lacks a strong narrative arc, instead meandering through loosely connected events with no real stakes or momentum. A historical war film should thrive on tension and character investment, yet Battle Over Britain offers neither. The absence of an enemy perspective also drains the film of depth, reducing aerial combat to an impersonal, video-game-like experience rather than a harrowing fight for survival.

While the film may have been made with genuine enthusiasm, it ultimately falls flat as both a war drama and a cinematic experience. With a more meticulous approach to historical accuracy, stronger direction, and a more engaging screenplay, Battle Over Britain could have been a worthy addition to the WWII film canon. Instead, it serves as a frustrating reminder that ambition alone cannot compensate for technical shortcomings and lack of storytelling finesse.

Of course, the title Battle over Britain is quite an overstatement. What is depicted here, at best, are a few isolated skirmishes rather than a comprehensive vision of what this epic battle truly was. It has been cemented in history with a name that carries weight and significance, yet in this case, it has been undeservedly appropriated-an act of naivety at best, and at worst, a rather sly opportunism.

From the point of view of the remains of a squadron, with a new replacement after losing two pilots, this story is more about what it was like for the fighter pilots both during and in-between battle.

The acting is good and the story and characters are interesting enough to keep you engaged to the end.

The evidently low-budget does however impact scenes, flying scenes in particular, with some moments more convincing than others. I swear I saw one Spitfire fly through a Heinkel wing (remember a ship doing something similar in Star Wars?) and the scenes showing battle through the gun sights were poor, whereas, oddly, the shots of German fighters in the rear view mirror were better, if still not that great. In short, the effects were low budget.

There aren't many real "Spits" around anymore and at times it seemed like they only had the use of the same one on the ground.

If you are looking for a non-stop, action-filled Battle of Britain story filled with great air scenes and dog fights, you'll probably be very disappointed by what you see here - but if you are interested in a tale about the psychological strain of war and how different pilots dealt with it, this is worth a watch.