Whispers
- 2015
- 1h 30m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,0/10
9,1 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA young couple grieving the recent death of their daughter move to the countryside where they are haunted by their tragedy and a sinister darkness.A young couple grieving the recent death of their daughter move to the countryside where they are haunted by their tragedy and a sinister darkness.A young couple grieving the recent death of their daughter move to the countryside where they are haunted by their tragedy and a sinister darkness.
- Prix
- 3 nominations au total
Emma Julia Jacobs
- The Nanny
- (as Emma Jacobs)
Rebecca Olsen
- The Demon
- (voice)
Harrison Cade
- Harry
- (uncredited)
Eileen Dietz
- The Demon
- (uncredited)
Avis en vedette
I am giving this a 2 because it had some interesting photography, and a few good ghost scenes.
The reviews that say this title is good, both the critic and user reviews, are all false. This movie is by no means a 7 out of 10.
The photography is poor. This is an MTI offering, and they have not improved with agree. In fact they still use the same intro with the letters MTI bursting out of the theater screen.
The sound is poor, the acting is poor, the plot is poor, and this movie has little if anything to do with what the description at Redbox says it is. It is also not a new title released in 2017, as you can see for yourself here at IMDb.
This is yet another example of a poor offering from Redbox, making you think it is new when it is not. It may be one of MTI's best offerings in the last few years, but their best offering is still worse than any other film company. Asylum Entertainment makes better movies than this - I'm not kidding.
I never say this, and rarely review this critically and low. But in this case it is merited. This title is not worth renting, save your money. I would not say this unless it was true. There s absolutely no redeemable quality to this movie. It may have a haunted house, but it is not even very good as a "haunted house" movie.
I hope IMDb at least cracks down in this illegitimate critic reviews that lead you to believe this movie is good. They are blatantly lying.
The reviews that say this title is good, both the critic and user reviews, are all false. This movie is by no means a 7 out of 10.
The photography is poor. This is an MTI offering, and they have not improved with agree. In fact they still use the same intro with the letters MTI bursting out of the theater screen.
The sound is poor, the acting is poor, the plot is poor, and this movie has little if anything to do with what the description at Redbox says it is. It is also not a new title released in 2017, as you can see for yourself here at IMDb.
This is yet another example of a poor offering from Redbox, making you think it is new when it is not. It may be one of MTI's best offerings in the last few years, but their best offering is still worse than any other film company. Asylum Entertainment makes better movies than this - I'm not kidding.
I never say this, and rarely review this critically and low. But in this case it is merited. This title is not worth renting, save your money. I would not say this unless it was true. There s absolutely no redeemable quality to this movie. It may have a haunted house, but it is not even very good as a "haunted house" movie.
I hope IMDb at least cracks down in this illegitimate critic reviews that lead you to believe this movie is good. They are blatantly lying.
Ghost movies I always like and this one was creepy and dark. With some good drama this was a good movie to watch during Halloween season. I want to see more films like this in the future.
First and foremost, for anyone skeptical about the widespread accusations of fake, highly positive reviews for this movie, there is good news. All you have to do is watch the trailer, or the first few minutes, to find out how much of a joke it is. Really. It's that conspicuously bad.
I am entirely certain that the vast majority of raving reviews posted for this film on IMDb are fake. The filmmakers have obviously run a sadly successful campaign of spamming the site with sham accounts, and as another reviewer has pointed out, the ages of these accounts give them away.
I have also looked into many of these accounts to find that "Whispers" is the only film the owner has reviewed since the account's creation. Sloppy and shameful.
On to the actual review:
This movie does one thing well. It manages to be entertaining in its sophomoric attempt at suspense and psychological horror. It does this for about the first ten minutes. Then it's just the kind of bad that makes you want to fall into a deep sleep, and upon waking, express your anger and bewilderment at its IMDb rating.
There isn't much to be said about the film's substance. It has none. The actors are so bad that they turn a substandard horror/thriller script into what plays out like a soap opera. Everything that the film tries to do falls flat. The parts of the script that could have worked as semi-decent horror are utterly ruined by the poor execution of everything from acting to set design, cinematography and editing.
At first, trying to keep an open mind, I thought: maybe surrealism? Absurdism? Maybe it's trying to be this incoherent and ridiculous? I actually couldn't tell if it was intended or if it was simply the generally clunky performance of the actors and filmmakers. However, intended or not, it quickly ceases to be entertaining, and also becomes exceedingly obvious that "Whispers" takes itself very seriously. Eventually, after wasting 90 minutes of my life, I came to the incontrovertible conclusion that, no. This movie is just bad. No need to overthink it. The filmmakers certainly didn't.
I am entirely certain that the vast majority of raving reviews posted for this film on IMDb are fake. The filmmakers have obviously run a sadly successful campaign of spamming the site with sham accounts, and as another reviewer has pointed out, the ages of these accounts give them away.
I have also looked into many of these accounts to find that "Whispers" is the only film the owner has reviewed since the account's creation. Sloppy and shameful.
On to the actual review:
This movie does one thing well. It manages to be entertaining in its sophomoric attempt at suspense and psychological horror. It does this for about the first ten minutes. Then it's just the kind of bad that makes you want to fall into a deep sleep, and upon waking, express your anger and bewilderment at its IMDb rating.
There isn't much to be said about the film's substance. It has none. The actors are so bad that they turn a substandard horror/thriller script into what plays out like a soap opera. Everything that the film tries to do falls flat. The parts of the script that could have worked as semi-decent horror are utterly ruined by the poor execution of everything from acting to set design, cinematography and editing.
At first, trying to keep an open mind, I thought: maybe surrealism? Absurdism? Maybe it's trying to be this incoherent and ridiculous? I actually couldn't tell if it was intended or if it was simply the generally clunky performance of the actors and filmmakers. However, intended or not, it quickly ceases to be entertaining, and also becomes exceedingly obvious that "Whispers" takes itself very seriously. Eventually, after wasting 90 minutes of my life, I came to the incontrovertible conclusion that, no. This movie is just bad. No need to overthink it. The filmmakers certainly didn't.
This was just terrible. Quite possibly the worst movie I've ever seen and I've seen Ishtar. There is nothing scary about this movie, it's not horror. It's suspenseful drama at best, and that's giving it too much credit. If you watch this movie you will wish you could get that hour and a half of your life back...but you can't. I unfortunately went off the average review and didn't actually read the red box reviews, until after I watched it. It was then that I realized all the 4 &5 star reviews all made reference to "girl power" and "go girl". I guess if a woman directs a movie it's automatically a great movie. My fiancé and I disagree.
After reading the Reviews I had high expectations. It was very hard to follow from beginning to and I'm not even sure I know what happened! I tried watching it twice and still have no idea the plot line, or the story! I love a good go story, but that I understand. I would not recommend! If they could've tied it together it would've made the story!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesEileen Dietz who played the Demon in the Exorcist had all her scenes cut in the final film but she can still be seen at the end of the teaser trailer.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Whispers?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 30 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant