Emmanuelle est en quête d'un plaisir perdu. Elle s'envole seule à Hong Kong, pour un voyage professionnel. Dans cette ville-monde sensuelle, elle multiplie les expériences et fait la rencont... Tout lireEmmanuelle est en quête d'un plaisir perdu. Elle s'envole seule à Hong Kong, pour un voyage professionnel. Dans cette ville-monde sensuelle, elle multiplie les expériences et fait la rencontre de Kei, un homme qui ne cesse de lui échapper.Emmanuelle est en quête d'un plaisir perdu. Elle s'envole seule à Hong Kong, pour un voyage professionnel. Dans cette ville-monde sensuelle, elle multiplie les expériences et fait la rencontre de Kei, un homme qui ne cesse de lui échapper.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Prix
- 2 nominations au total
Anthony Chau-Sang Wong
- The Eye
- (as Anthony Wong)
Avis en vedette
The good: beautiful locations, often great cinematography and the film mostly has a great atmosphere (reminded me a bit of Lost in Translation). For its style alone, I'd give it a 7/10
The rest however is pretty bad. No character depth or development, pointless and often involuntarily funny dialogue, which makes the scenes that are supposed to be erotic quite dull And also: hardly any story
If you're looking for a stylishly made movie with no substance that gives you a good laugh from time to time because of its ridiculous dialogue and logic, then you'll at least be entertained.
But from a holistic point of view, I can't give it more than 4/10.
The rest however is pretty bad. No character depth or development, pointless and often involuntarily funny dialogue, which makes the scenes that are supposed to be erotic quite dull And also: hardly any story
If you're looking for a stylishly made movie with no substance that gives you a good laugh from time to time because of its ridiculous dialogue and logic, then you'll at least be entertained.
But from a holistic point of view, I can't give it more than 4/10.
Whoever decided to let Audrey Diwan direct and destroy this nostaligic franchise needs to rather donate the production money to animal welfare.
This movie has nothing in common with the other movies in the franchise and labors on and on with infinite reels of redundant dialogue.
I am happy the franchise has been rebooted but please can they hand the movie back into the hands of a man to make and Audrey Diwan is better suited to directing " Grass is green let's watch it grow" Perhaps the moviemakers should spend some time watching the original movies to better understand what made this franchise actually premiere in movie theatres at one point.
Noemie Merlant was not badly cast, she did her best to bring sexuality into the movie but there was nothing to work with.
No idea what Naomi Watts was doing in this movie.
This movie has nothing in common with the other movies in the franchise and labors on and on with infinite reels of redundant dialogue.
I am happy the franchise has been rebooted but please can they hand the movie back into the hands of a man to make and Audrey Diwan is better suited to directing " Grass is green let's watch it grow" Perhaps the moviemakers should spend some time watching the original movies to better understand what made this franchise actually premiere in movie theatres at one point.
Noemie Merlant was not badly cast, she did her best to bring sexuality into the movie but there was nothing to work with.
No idea what Naomi Watts was doing in this movie.
What an embarassment to the Emmannuelle collection of movies throughout history.
Anyone who has ever watched an Emmanuelle movie knows that it is about sensuality and eroticness above all.
This movie was filmed like it was some new advertisement for a women's perfume. Make of that what you will.
The biggest sin of all is the main casting. Unfortunately, Noémie Merlant while appears sexy and sultry at first, she just doesn't have the physical beauty to live up to the legendary Silvia Kristel.
The movie becomes more and more drab and boring as each scene comes and goes without much excitement.
Overall, for fans of T n A, this was also a colossal disappointment.
Anyone who has ever watched an Emmanuelle movie knows that it is about sensuality and eroticness above all.
This movie was filmed like it was some new advertisement for a women's perfume. Make of that what you will.
The biggest sin of all is the main casting. Unfortunately, Noémie Merlant while appears sexy and sultry at first, she just doesn't have the physical beauty to live up to the legendary Silvia Kristel.
The movie becomes more and more drab and boring as each scene comes and goes without much excitement.
Overall, for fans of T n A, this was also a colossal disappointment.
Aesthetically gorgeous. Apart from that, the script is almost laughable, and dialogs even more. No action, no word is believable, hence disconnected from the audience. I'm not quite sure what has been done to the sound, was every line redone post-production? It ends up being very flat and takes away the spice you would expect from such a great actress as Noemie Merlant. On this note, the entire cast is impressive for giving their very best to an empty shell.
A dozen people left the room during the movie, first one after 10 minutes. I myself fought to stay, out of respect for the cast and crew (Naomi Watts is such a good actress) and for Cinema itself. I hardly managed. The end brings nothing. I left running, quite concerned that a 2024 version of a famously erotic name had been stamped on a movie that reflects in no way the evolution of feminism, and women's pleasure, since 1974.
A dozen people left the room during the movie, first one after 10 minutes. I myself fought to stay, out of respect for the cast and crew (Naomi Watts is such a good actress) and for Cinema itself. I hardly managed. The end brings nothing. I left running, quite concerned that a 2024 version of a famously erotic name had been stamped on a movie that reflects in no way the evolution of feminism, and women's pleasure, since 1974.
Emmanuelle (1974) is legendary. Not in any way because the Just Jaeckin classic is an amazing movie, but because it became widely known for two main things:
1) The boundary pushing eroticism of an adventurous woman seeking sexual emancipation/discovery.
2) Sylvia Kristel, a then 22 year-old, who became an icon of perfect beauty.
Although I have never been a fan of remakes, Emmanualle lends itself well to a reimaging simply because sexual attitudes change over time and the original is now over 50 years old.
Emmanuelle (2024) is actually better than I was expecting. The cinematography is especially beautiful, and the tone rather stylish. Noémie Merlant is elegant, somewhat similar looking to a young Phoebe Waller-Bridge, yet her breasts are just as equally voluptuous as that of Kristel's.
Does the movie push the boundaries of today as the '74 classic once did? No, and although it could have well done this, Emmanuelle conciously refrains from drifting into being a piece of generic sleaze by limiting the nudity/sex to where it feels appropriate. Emmanuelle's journey to sexual enlightenment could have had a clearer narrative however.
The addition of Naomi Watts was a rather delightful piece of casting, but regretfully she does not partake in any sexy shenanigans.
Overall, Emmanuelle '24 is a nice enough update. Yet it won't be a significant title 50 years from now or topple the original's reputation.
1) The boundary pushing eroticism of an adventurous woman seeking sexual emancipation/discovery.
2) Sylvia Kristel, a then 22 year-old, who became an icon of perfect beauty.
Although I have never been a fan of remakes, Emmanualle lends itself well to a reimaging simply because sexual attitudes change over time and the original is now over 50 years old.
Emmanuelle (2024) is actually better than I was expecting. The cinematography is especially beautiful, and the tone rather stylish. Noémie Merlant is elegant, somewhat similar looking to a young Phoebe Waller-Bridge, yet her breasts are just as equally voluptuous as that of Kristel's.
Does the movie push the boundaries of today as the '74 classic once did? No, and although it could have well done this, Emmanuelle conciously refrains from drifting into being a piece of generic sleaze by limiting the nudity/sex to where it feels appropriate. Emmanuelle's journey to sexual enlightenment could have had a clearer narrative however.
The addition of Naomi Watts was a rather delightful piece of casting, but regretfully she does not partake in any sexy shenanigans.
Overall, Emmanuelle '24 is a nice enough update. Yet it won't be a significant title 50 years from now or topple the original's reputation.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe lead actress Sylvia Kristel was 21 years old when Emmanuelle (1974) was released. By comparison, Noémie Merlant was 35 with the release of the remake Emmanuelle (2024).
- ConnexionsReferenced in Radio Dolin: The Results of 2024. The Best Films of the Year (2024)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Emmanuelle?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 712 413 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 47m(107 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant