ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,5/10
2,7 k
MA NOTE
Expulsé de sa forêt, Woody le pic se retrouve au camp Woo Hoo, où il croit pouvoir rester pour toujours. Mais oh problème! Un inspecteur veut fermer le camp.Expulsé de sa forêt, Woody le pic se retrouve au camp Woo Hoo, où il croit pouvoir rester pour toujours. Mais oh problème! Un inspecteur veut fermer le camp.Expulsé de sa forêt, Woody le pic se retrouve au camp Woo Hoo, où il croit pouvoir rester pour toujours. Mais oh problème! Un inspecteur veut fermer le camp.
- Prix
- 1 nomination au total
William Atticus Parker
- Delivery Guy
- (as William Parker)
Ras-Samuel
- Kyler
- (as Ras-Samuel Welda'abzgi)
Daniel Aquino
- Tom Wazowski
- (voice)
Eric Bauza
- Woody Woodpecker
- (voice)
Avis en vedette
The movie was quite average overall. The CGI quality was acceptable, but it didn't particularly stand out. However, the voice castings for the characters were impressive and managed to capture the essence of the original Woody the Woodpecker series.
While some of the jokes missed the mark, it's important to note that the film is primarily targeted at children, but adults can still find entertainment value in it. The storyline was fairly basic and lacked depth, following a predictable and straightforward trajectory. The pacing of the movie was notably brisk from the outset, which may have contributed to the feeling of it being a bit rushed.
In terms of the performances, the actors did reasonably well, although, at times, the acting came across as somewhat overexaggerated. The musical scores were nothing out of the ordinary and did little to elevate the overall viewing experience.
In summary, the movie had a low-budget feel to it, but despite its shortcomings, it still manages to warrant a modest recommendation.
While some of the jokes missed the mark, it's important to note that the film is primarily targeted at children, but adults can still find entertainment value in it. The storyline was fairly basic and lacked depth, following a predictable and straightforward trajectory. The pacing of the movie was notably brisk from the outset, which may have contributed to the feeling of it being a bit rushed.
In terms of the performances, the actors did reasonably well, although, at times, the acting came across as somewhat overexaggerated. The musical scores were nothing out of the ordinary and did little to elevate the overall viewing experience.
In summary, the movie had a low-budget feel to it, but despite its shortcomings, it still manages to warrant a modest recommendation.
My little boy is five, he thinks this movie is great. Which is good for him and me. Unfortunately, this isn't one of those movies that caters for adults too. You will likely only find it funny or entertaining if you are five (or near five).
On a side note, I noticed a couple people voted this movie as a seven. I worry for these people. How are you scaling this stuff? This is why IMDB has to be taken with a pinch of salt these days, since streaming, the scores are not good.
Anyway, this is a movie with woody woodpecker and the chick you used to be hot in 'Weeds'. She's sixty now you know? Still looks pretty good.
Am I at the limt yet? Oh yeah, there now - bye!
Peace.
On a side note, I noticed a couple people voted this movie as a seven. I worry for these people. How are you scaling this stuff? This is why IMDB has to be taken with a pinch of salt these days, since streaming, the scores are not good.
Anyway, this is a movie with woody woodpecker and the chick you used to be hot in 'Weeds'. She's sixty now you know? Still looks pretty good.
Am I at the limt yet? Oh yeah, there now - bye!
Peace.
This might go down as the worst movie of the year. I personally didn't find a single joke funny and I thought that the characters were at best bland and uninteresting and at worst insanely annoying.
This movie is without any doubt made for kids aged 5-10 but in my opinion a movie shouldn't get a free pass just because it's made for kids. This is just mindless entertainment for kids with a very basic message.
I also thought the acting extremely poor and I don't think there was a single good performance in it. This isn't just the child actors I'm talking about it extends to the adults, most of the dialogue is very emotionless.
Overall this movie was terrible and I would only recommend it to people who find ironic enjoyment out of bad movies.
This movie is without any doubt made for kids aged 5-10 but in my opinion a movie shouldn't get a free pass just because it's made for kids. This is just mindless entertainment for kids with a very basic message.
I also thought the acting extremely poor and I don't think there was a single good performance in it. This isn't just the child actors I'm talking about it extends to the adults, most of the dialogue is very emotionless.
Overall this movie was terrible and I would only recommend it to people who find ironic enjoyment out of bad movies.
Woody gets annoyed by a brash social influencer doing a production nearby. He causes havoc and drives him away. For all the destruction, the park banishes him. He finds a new home in Camp Woo Hoo next door. He befriends young camper Maggie. Maggie's mother is camp owner Angie (Mary-Louise Parker). They get into a battle with a rival camp and escaped criminal Buzz Buzzard.
This is a sequel to the 2017 Woody Woodpecker movie. I doubt it's necessary to see the first movie. It's live action with cartoon characters. It looks cheap on the level of Netflix and it's not trying to be more than that. First I don't like the design of Woody. He reminds me of the worst of his animation. It's definitely not the classic cartoons. On the other hand, Buzz looks fine. As for the rest, it's a lot of weak kiddie movie story and forgettable characters. Even Mary-Louise Parker is struggling in this one.
This is a sequel to the 2017 Woody Woodpecker movie. I doubt it's necessary to see the first movie. It's live action with cartoon characters. It looks cheap on the level of Netflix and it's not trying to be more than that. First I don't like the design of Woody. He reminds me of the worst of his animation. It's definitely not the classic cartoons. On the other hand, Buzz looks fine. As for the rest, it's a lot of weak kiddie movie story and forgettable characters. Even Mary-Louise Parker is struggling in this one.
Only reason I rated it so high is because I'm just happy to have another Woody Woodpecker movie.
The first one (2017) was a joy to watch but this one being a "sequel" to that was an extreme let down. Didn't follow the original story, didn't have any of the original characters which I really wanted to see. Introduced wayy too many new animated characters and they can understand woody?!? No one could understand him in the 1st one (2017) but now they all just magically can?
Really disappointed in this movie, it had the potential to be amazing but had bad and lazy production/directing. Really wish this was a real sequel that kept the story line going from the first movie. This one (2024) would have made more sense as a prequel and a sorry one at that.
The first one (2017) was a joy to watch but this one being a "sequel" to that was an extreme let down. Didn't follow the original story, didn't have any of the original characters which I really wanted to see. Introduced wayy too many new animated characters and they can understand woody?!? No one could understand him in the 1st one (2017) but now they all just magically can?
Really disappointed in this movie, it had the potential to be amazing but had bad and lazy production/directing. Really wish this was a real sequel that kept the story line going from the first movie. This one (2024) would have made more sense as a prequel and a sorry one at that.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWhen Woody meets Maggie, he carves and paints a wooden statue of Chilly Willy the Pinguin (1953). Chilly Willy is a character who's shorts ran along with Woody Woodpeckers, on the Woody Woodpecker Show.
- GaffesThere's no mention of why Woody no longer lives in his custom built house by the river that Tommy's dad built for him.
- Générique farfeluEric Bauza (Woody Woodpecker), Kevin Michael Richardson (Buzz Buzzard) and Tom Kenny's (Wally Walrus) names appear during the "main cast" section of the credits, but not the "full cast" section.
- ConnexionsFollows Woody le pic (2017)
- Bandes originalesI Love This
Performed by Danger Twins
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Woody Woodpecker Goes to Camp?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Woody Woodpecker Goes to Camp
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 15 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Durée1 heure 40 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.90:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant