La détective Holly O'Rourke et son équipe d'homicide, dans le cadre d'une enquête apparemment ouverte et fermée, menacent de détruire sa carrière, sa famille et sa foi en la justice.La détective Holly O'Rourke et son équipe d'homicide, dans le cadre d'une enquête apparemment ouverte et fermée, menacent de détruire sa carrière, sa famille et sa foi en la justice.La détective Holly O'Rourke et son équipe d'homicide, dans le cadre d'une enquête apparemment ouverte et fermée, menacent de détruire sa carrière, sa famille et sa foi en la justice.
- Prix
- 2 nominations au total
Avis en vedette
It wasn't. In any way that matters.
The story, the plot, the twists and turns of an exciting criminal investigation, all are nowhere to be found. The story developed like something you'd watch on TV news, but there's a way to make stories like this compelling. This show fails in that.
Another unbearable thing is the interpersonal relationship - it feels like the writers heard that people on crime TV shows converse about things other than work, and peppered the plot with unbearable, boring drivel that helped with nothing and had no relation to anything.
This show feels like it was written by a computer. The only saving grace is the lead actress, who tried to bring life into this flogged horse.
My advice, don't bother.
I think underbelly or blue heelers did better when they were around, sorry to write such bad review, but being involved in real police situations im very critical about being realistic.
Most of the acting is fairly good. Unfortunately, the character development is too shallow across the board.
The lead isn't given a lot of emotional range to display. She literally never gets angry, she just accepts and withstands and breezes right past things. One can't understand her personal motivations to either achieve in her career, or to mess things up in her personal life, because very low insight is offered. It's another generalized shame parade for a character like her, and then she just plows through, taking things in stride and offering more distancing to her reality than anything else.
This show also doesn't display much of 'justice', in terms of outcomes - no criminal prosecutions are depicted for the large majority of the production, and almost everything done in the pursuit of 'law enforcement' turns out to be a pointless fail. They are regularly putting more people in jeopardy than they offer functional protection to. (Too real, perhaps?)
It also has a thinly veiled anti-abortion narrative, partially delivered by a child, which is really a grasping effort.
It features an elderly paternal figure that applies judgement and advice inappropriately, for almost any scene he's acting poorly in. He's on the outside of everything - actions, conversations, factual details, but thinks his own personal wisdom makes his warrantless criticisms and blunt advice somehow functional, or helpful.
Shows that build around a 'strong female lead' of reproductive age should not still be leaning into a parade of criticisms against her and her 'shame' - to which she isn't very reactive, because she 'has hard job'. This is a sorry cop-out, not to make a pun, that keeps getting repeated, almost nauseatingly.
Lastly, a little more leavening humor (sans sex or death references) would've helped.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesBased loosely on the real life murder of Jane Thurgood-Dove
- Citations
Maia Kirsner: I often wonder what it was like for Sonia. You come home same as always and someone out of the blue is trying to kill you no reason. You have no idea what is happening, the terror. I don't know how you'd feel knowing it's all about to end.
Holly O'Rourke: You do whatever it takes. You keep fighting until the end and then..
Holly O'Rourke: We're all that she's got.
Maia Kirsner: We all need someone.
Holly O'Rourke: I know.
Meilleurs choix
- How many seasons does Human Error have?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Couleur