ÉVALUATION IMDb
6,4/10
3,8 k
MA NOTE
Ce documentaire révèle comment la police a prouvé que l'infirmier en soins intensifs Charles Cullen tuait des patients et comment il a bien failli échapper à la justice.Ce documentaire révèle comment la police a prouvé que l'infirmier en soins intensifs Charles Cullen tuait des patients et comment il a bien failli échapper à la justice.Ce documentaire révèle comment la police a prouvé que l'infirmier en soins intensifs Charles Cullen tuait des patients et comment il a bien failli échapper à la justice.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Prix
- 1 victoire au total
Charles Cullen
- Self
- (archive footage)
Bruce Ruck
- Self - Toxicologist
- (as Dr. Bruce Ruck)
Steven Marcus
- Self - Medical Director, Poison Control Center 1983 - 2016
- (as Dr. Steven Marcus)
Helen Dean
- Self - Murder Victim
- (archive footage)
Larry Dean
- Self - Son of Helen Dean
- (archive footage)
Florian Gall
- Self - Murder Victim
- (archive footage)
- (as Fr Florian Gale)
Dennis Miller
- Self - CEO & President, Somerset Medical Center
- (archive footage)
Vanessa Tyler
- Self - Reporter
- (archive footage)
Avis en vedette
I watched this having watched the film in which Eddie Redmayne started as Charles Cullen.
I'm glad I did it this way round, so many things I found hard to believe in the film, were actually true, the film wasn't sensationalised, it seemed to stick quite rigidly to the content.
What a documentary should be, thought provoking, dramatic, revealing, and a little bit shocking, some parts of it were actually hard to fathom, that is one messed up system.
Amy Loughren's thoughts were astonishing the whole way through, once again, I'm speechless at how rotten the establishment was, how many lives could have been saved.
One thing the film didn't really get into was Cullen's motivation, you will actually hear that in his own words here, the interview sequences were astonishing I thought. What a curious guy, I'd like to see more on him, to try and understand him a little better, he's impossible to piece together.
8/10.
I'm glad I did it this way round, so many things I found hard to believe in the film, were actually true, the film wasn't sensationalised, it seemed to stick quite rigidly to the content.
What a documentary should be, thought provoking, dramatic, revealing, and a little bit shocking, some parts of it were actually hard to fathom, that is one messed up system.
Amy Loughren's thoughts were astonishing the whole way through, once again, I'm speechless at how rotten the establishment was, how many lives could have been saved.
One thing the film didn't really get into was Cullen's motivation, you will actually hear that in his own words here, the interview sequences were astonishing I thought. What a curious guy, I'd like to see more on him, to try and understand him a little better, he's impossible to piece together.
8/10.
First of all, when I first watched the official teaser of the documentary I liked it and I had high expectations about it. Eventually, it was as good as I had imagined and I liked it. The plot of the documentary was very interesting and mysterious. The storyline was well-written, well-explained and everything was accurate. I have to admit, it was a kinda intense documentary, especially the ending part. In my opinion, it was a nice crime documentary and it wasn't boring. The ending part was kinda predictable, but it was emotionally intense. Overall, "Capturing the Killer Nurse" was a nice documentary and I would probably recommend it to my friends.
An interesting documentary, however there is far too much focus on how this main nurse who ended up helping capture this killer felt so sorry for him and kept saying what a great nurse this he was. Like she couldn't stop long enough to look at reality instead of bouncing back to what she thought was reality. She even has the nerve to put the responsibility on her 11-year-old daughter of whether or not she should help the investigation! Not a bad watch though, put together well by Netflix. What does strike me though, if I may say so, is that we never hear anything bad about hospitals even though they allowed this person, and others not really unlike him - this is not the first such story -- yet the Catholic Church is practically known for harboring the few pedophiles that eventually came to light. How ironic that people are so willing to vilify the church but not the hospital yet this crime was exceedingly worse than what the church did. Just food for thought.
Truth may be stranger than fiction, but in the case of this documentary, it's an improvement. Serial killers have been a compelling subject for dramatization since Hitchcock's "Psycho," at least in American popular culture. But the fascination dates back to Jack the Ripper, and even farther back to the Middle Ages. This year it's Netflix's recent portrayal of the "good nurse" killer, a dismal excuse for biographical adaptation. It might have been worthwhile if it had offered new insight into horrible events, portrayed compelling emotions, or delved into human nature. The result could have been interesting, even entertaining, like a thriller. This documentary accomplishes all of this with no convoluted plot and contrived performances. The actual killer, Charles Cullen, is a far more chilling and impenetrable human being than the one portrayed by Eddie Redmayne. Cullen's matter-of-fact delivery as he explains the motivations that lead him to kill patients and his almost childlike self-possession are unnerving. Redmayne is a good actor, but his choice of intonation and nearly comatose performance failed to capture these real qualities. With straight-forward story telling and genuine emotion, this film imparts unimaginable horrors all the more frightening because they are so credible.
I read the Good Nurse five years ago and I consider it one of the best true crime books that I have ever read, and I have read well over three hundred of them.
Charles Cullen is the good nurse in question here. The lunatic worked at several hospitals and a nursing home, leaving a trail of death behind.
Finally, after fifteen years and a number of untimely and suspicious deaths, one courageous nurse voiced her feelings to a pair of tenacious detectives.
A Catholic priest was one of Chuckie's murder victims and after being exhumed, the good reverend had a high level of the heart medication Digoxin in his body.
The recordings of Cullen are riveting and I only wish that more of them had been used in the film.
I highly recommend both the book and the film.
Charles Cullen is the good nurse in question here. The lunatic worked at several hospitals and a nursing home, leaving a trail of death behind.
Finally, after fifteen years and a number of untimely and suspicious deaths, one courageous nurse voiced her feelings to a pair of tenacious detectives.
A Catholic priest was one of Chuckie's murder victims and after being exhumed, the good reverend had a high level of the heart medication Digoxin in his body.
The recordings of Cullen are riveting and I only wish that more of them had been used in the film.
I highly recommend both the book and the film.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAt about 36 mins, there is an aerial shot of the Hotel Bethlehem in Bethlehem, PA. It is a national historic landmark. The hotel, which is still in operation, was built in 1920, replacing an older hotel dating back to the 1820s.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Capturing the Killer Nurse?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Capturing the Killer Nurse
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 34 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant