Malaikottai Vaaliban

Soundscape was impressive with it's subduedness. Rustic dated instruments.

Movie is designed as a fable tale, aligned with the subject. Lot of care has gone into all the technical aspects to bring in visual and sound frames that capture the canvas of the movie.

Unfortunately, the subtitles spoiled some of it. Tasteless bland font did blemish all the care that went into the costumes, art design, landscape, language, sound work.

Mohanlal has done excellent action work for his age. Action is very artistically done - blending in story telling, sound design, costumes, action choreography, art design.

Mohanlal has sung couple of songs which he should not have done. His singing does not suit the ambience of the movie. Too timid for the all powerful protagonist.

The story line had fable-like quality to it, and reminded me of Aitihyamala stories. There were a few dragging spots in the script. Build up for the second part was good but also felt a little made up.

Cinematography and lighting work has been excellent. There was a painting like quality to the frames as opposed to the overly stylish and loud style that is typical. Same holds for the background scores. Careful thought out work.

The movie excelled in many aspects. Subtitles was the one thing that disappointed. There were spots where subtitles showed but dialogue did not come out. Now that is a mistake. I would have stylized the font to match the canvas.

The language use in the songs and dialogues have been kept folk like, and unembellished.

Not a movie for everyone. There is enough art to appreciate here.

The folklore of the beast.

(grandma narrating a mythical story)

Firstly, I contend that this film may not significantly impact the box office, primarily due to the preferences of the Malayali audience. While it's true that there has been a growing acceptance of art in cinema, those very individuals who appreciate artistic endeavors seem unwilling to forego the mass appeal and adrenaline-filled moments associated with their favorite actors, Mohanlal being a prominent example.

There is an expectation for something markedly different, but the audience often becomes fatigued and concludes that the film falls short of expectations. Some argue that watching an LJP movie is not everyone's cup of tea, and the notion that the major audience deems it as such is dismissed as an excuse to distance themselves from what they perceive as a subpar cinematic experience.

Personally, I attended the theatrical screening solely for one reason - LJP. Having previously admired his work, I was convinced that if anyone in the Malayalam film industry prioritizes art over commercial gains, it would be LJP. The collaboration with one of Mollywood's biggest stars, Mohanlal, intrigued me, and I was eager to witness how this pairing would fare.

To my delight, the usual rawness characteristic of LJP's films was notably absent in this production. He had undergone a transformation, evolving into something even more refined. The cinematic canvas presented by the film instilled in me a renewed sense of hope that Malayalis possess elements that Hollywood lacks. Rather than attempting to mimic, LJP crafted something distinctly his own - from the plot and characters to the narrative structure, underscored by a captivating background score and exceptional cinematography.

The film evoked a sensation similiar to the enchantment experienced during childhood when grandparents narrated mythical stories. The suspense, love, tragedy, and action encapsulated in the movie echoed the emotional resonance of those tales.

However, I must acknowledge a couple of setbacks: the dialogues, at times, felt artificial, disrupting the immersive environment the film was building. The frequent change in the style of the movie, changing from a static shot to an action disrupting the consistency. Additionally, the abundance of songs, while not inherently objectionable, risked veering towards a musical rather than maintaining the essence of an LJP film. They tried to convey many stories in a novel like fashion but it may make the viewer that something is lagging behind .

While further delving into the artistry without revealing the plot proves challenging, "Malaikotta Valiban" is certainly a folklore of the beast.

What If Quentin Tarantino made an Indian movie ? Yes. That's exactly what "Malaikottai Valiban" is on screen.

Brilliantly woven piece, the movie begins where you think it ends. The amazing plot twist will keep you in edge of the seat. LJP's story telling is always unique, the Malaikottai Valiban is like a video game, where you finish one lever after other each one more daunting than the previous and at the end one final big mission which looks impossible with an absolute plot twist.

The movie is filled with wide angle shots and landscapes, Madhu Neelakandan's cinematography is really brilliant. I loved it personally.

It's not a movie for Mohan Lal's fan, it won't have extravagant intro, it's a movie made according to what the story really wants and that makes the movie absolutely a masterpiece.

Danish Sait will bag multiple awards for his role for sure, and I have no doubt it. You can see a director's real talent when you see Danish acting in this movie.

Overall this movie is an art of Indian cinema, LJP has done it again.

It took me a good 30 minutes or so to get sucked into the mystical universe of Malaikottai Vaaliban. Still, once I did, I'm guessing I enjoyed it more than 90% of the audience.. gauging from the varied reactions at the cinema hall. This film marries the sensibilities of a large-scale Puranic opera with the narrative style of a Kurosawa Samurai flick and the visuals of a Sergio Leone western. Since we've seen how much the hype train has damaged a Mohanlal film in recent times, I chose to largely disregard the "claims" made in the promotional interviews in the run-up to its release. And that helped. Knowing I had sat down for an LJP directorial was enough assurance of the film being inherently unpredictable and not your regular fast-paced crowd-pleaser.

This helped me appreciate Madhu Neelakantan's postcard-like frames a lot more (especially the extended static shots that bored most viewers). Yes, they did feel as overindulgent as LJP's use of slow-motion in the action blocks. But I was already sold. This bizarre universe, its distinct plot developments, and oddball characters gradually grew on me. The sudden shifts in tone (from soapy to violent to farcical to philosophical), Prashant Pillai's use of folk instruments to underline some of the set pieces, and even the stupid love-plus-revenge-triangle in the second half, which normally would have killed even the tiniest bit of interest in me - I was able to digest most of it. That said, I did not feel vehemently connected to any of the characters including the protagonist, and it was the aura created through sheer audio-visual magic that kept me fascinated.

Malaikottai Vaaliban heavily invokes the feeling of reading an Indian comic book based on local legends, and LJP has tried to play it to his strengths. It hasn't really fired on all cylinders, but I'd still appreciate him for not half-arsing it. The work of the art & production design departments is essential in letting you connect with the lore of this particular land. P S Rafeeque's writing works when it's busy building to a key moment, but is archaic as hell when it revolves around the tropes of romance or lust. The female characters (and the transwoman), especially, are poorly etched. The colonists are too caricaturish, reminding you of LJP's own Double Barrel. When the film finally poses a pertinent question on an indomitable warrior's existential crisis, it gets too busy building to a sequel that may not even happen. Argh, why even bother?

This film is not for general audience who expect commercial elements. It's slow paced. Could have been managed better. People who were almost sleeping during the 1st hour are later claiming the film is 10/10. Why? They want to look like pro movie analysts lmao. If you give this 10/10 just because you can claim "Pure LJP film", then your actual standards are low!

For neutrals, If you have free time, go and watch it. Don't watch it out of FOMO due to overrating by wannabe analysts. There is degrading as well by general audience. Overall, it's a different attempt but bang average outcome. Different does not mean 10/10 lol. Don't go with over expectations after hearing fancy phrases like "Visual treat", "Not everyone's cup of tea", "LJP Brilliance"