Les terroristes prennent le contrôle du sommet du G20 avec le président, apportant leur expérience gouvernementale et militaire pour défendre la famille, l'entreprise et le monde.Les terroristes prennent le contrôle du sommet du G20 avec le président, apportant leur expérience gouvernementale et militaire pour défendre la famille, l'entreprise et le monde.Les terroristes prennent le contrôle du sommet du G20 avec le président, apportant leur expérience gouvernementale et militaire pour défendre la famille, l'entreprise et le monde.
- Prix
- 1 victoire et 4 nominations au total
Avis en vedette
Caught this one out of curiosity and honestly, while it's not breaking any new ground, it wasn't as bad as some of these reviews make it out to be.
Yes, the plot is familiar (think Olympus Has Fallen meets streaming-era political thriller) and yes, some of the action scenes definitely stretch believability - but I actually found parts of it enjoyable. The pacing moves along quickly enough, and the production value is solid for what I assume is a straight-to-streaming project.
Anthony Starr is easily the standout - brings a fun, menacing edge to his role without going full cartoon villain. Viola Davis has her moments too, even if her character arc feels a bit rushed.
It's definitely heavy on the "message" and a bit too polished politically, but if you're not expecting a masterpiece and just want something explosive and passable to unwind to - it works. Especially if you're a fan of the cast.
Yes, the plot is familiar (think Olympus Has Fallen meets streaming-era political thriller) and yes, some of the action scenes definitely stretch believability - but I actually found parts of it enjoyable. The pacing moves along quickly enough, and the production value is solid for what I assume is a straight-to-streaming project.
Anthony Starr is easily the standout - brings a fun, menacing edge to his role without going full cartoon villain. Viola Davis has her moments too, even if her character arc feels a bit rushed.
It's definitely heavy on the "message" and a bit too polished politically, but if you're not expecting a masterpiece and just want something explosive and passable to unwind to - it works. Especially if you're a fan of the cast.
G20 convention, where President-Viola spearheads an anti-famine project for funding.. farmers(?) from poor countries using cryptocurrency. It goes terribly wrong, with important hostages and the world's economics threatened for the duration of the film.
Personally, I feel this action thriller (with a light political theme) fails to hook the viewer from the start with an uninteresting, rushed and bare-boned subplot about family issues that adds little emotional weight. Slow pacing, flat action, a weak villain and more.
The cast is decent and does what they can with the material. With a Viola Davis playing a Military-President that one-shots surrounding enemies while spinning 360°, and the pair of "Wakandan" soldiers (this movie, not me) coming out on top. And Antony Starr's character (the main reason I tuned in) feels underwritten and ultimately forgettable.
That disappointment kind of sums up the whole thing. The plot, character development, and resolution all feel like they're just background noise for military action set pieces. It's not over-the-top, but there's little tension or intrigue, and not enough fun to recommend.
Personally, I feel this action thriller (with a light political theme) fails to hook the viewer from the start with an uninteresting, rushed and bare-boned subplot about family issues that adds little emotional weight. Slow pacing, flat action, a weak villain and more.
The cast is decent and does what they can with the material. With a Viola Davis playing a Military-President that one-shots surrounding enemies while spinning 360°, and the pair of "Wakandan" soldiers (this movie, not me) coming out on top. And Antony Starr's character (the main reason I tuned in) feels underwritten and ultimately forgettable.
That disappointment kind of sums up the whole thing. The plot, character development, and resolution all feel like they're just background noise for military action set pieces. It's not over-the-top, but there's little tension or intrigue, and not enough fun to recommend.
It was sort of okay until about halfway through. It's annoying having a teenager save the day.
But the worst part was when the president, for the third time, decides she can't leave someone behind. She has to save them.
When the obvious thing is she can do more for them if she can actually get out of the situation.
Then she gets into a (second) fight with a terrorist, this time because she didn't just shoot him in the back of the head when she had the chance. These guys were killing people left and right, and she tells him to "drop the weapon" then lets him close while he's dropping it, and then I'm sure somehow she gets out of it, but at that point, I gave up.
But the worst part was when the president, for the third time, decides she can't leave someone behind. She has to save them.
When the obvious thing is she can do more for them if she can actually get out of the situation.
Then she gets into a (second) fight with a terrorist, this time because she didn't just shoot him in the back of the head when she had the chance. These guys were killing people left and right, and she tells him to "drop the weapon" then lets him close while he's dropping it, and then I'm sure somehow she gets out of it, but at that point, I gave up.
So watched this right after work today and I must confess I'm utterly bamboozled as to how hell a movie with such a stacked cast stuffed with so many action sequences can be so boring??
It's obvious it's got a decent budget as the production values are there and there's a whole heap of plot ideas (mostly B rated tech thriller and tinfoil hat taking points) and mixed character motivations but somehow fails to cohere into a solid whole.
Really disappointing as I really like a lot of the cast members and none of them are phoning it in.
Trying to find another 50 chars so I'd best point out it's MGM marque but it does feel like a amazon direct to streaming effort.
It's obvious it's got a decent budget as the production values are there and there's a whole heap of plot ideas (mostly B rated tech thriller and tinfoil hat taking points) and mixed character motivations but somehow fails to cohere into a solid whole.
Really disappointing as I really like a lot of the cast members and none of them are phoning it in.
Trying to find another 50 chars so I'd best point out it's MGM marque but it does feel like a amazon direct to streaming effort.
Not convincing!
"G20" sets out to be a high-stakes political thriller but ends up as a chaotic blend of clichés, flat dialogue, and a lead character powered more by plot armor than by actual depth.
The antagonists are cartoonish at best, and while Davis gives it her all, even her talent can't elevate a script that gives her nothing real to work with. Her character is less a leader navigating crisis and more a one-woman army with an overused action trope checklist.
Visually, the film is competent - slick shots, moody lighting, fast cuts - but none of it can hide the hollow core. The geopolitical backdrop feels more like window dressing than substance, with any meaningful commentary buried under explosions and melodrama.
In the end, "G20" feels like a poorly staged summit itself: loud, overhyped, and completely lacking in anything that matters.
"G20" sets out to be a high-stakes political thriller but ends up as a chaotic blend of clichés, flat dialogue, and a lead character powered more by plot armor than by actual depth.
The antagonists are cartoonish at best, and while Davis gives it her all, even her talent can't elevate a script that gives her nothing real to work with. Her character is less a leader navigating crisis and more a one-woman army with an overused action trope checklist.
Visually, the film is competent - slick shots, moody lighting, fast cuts - but none of it can hide the hollow core. The geopolitical backdrop feels more like window dressing than substance, with any meaningful commentary buried under explosions and melodrama.
In the end, "G20" feels like a poorly staged summit itself: loud, overhyped, and completely lacking in anything that matters.
Viola Davis Through the Years
Viola Davis Through the Years
From The Help and Ma Rainey's Black Bottom to "How to Get Away with Murder" and G20, take a look back at the impressive carrer of Viola Davis.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAnthony Anderson went to a Cape Town emergency room because of a "fight with a chair" on the set.
- GaffesBad guys need the voice of the presidents to generate deepfakes. But their voices are already publicly available everywhere for years.
- ConnexionsReferenced in 82nd Golden Globe Awards (2025)
- Bandes originalesPata Pata
Written by Miriam Makeba and Jerry Ragovoy
Performed by Miriam Makeba
Courtesy of Strut Records, a division of K7 Music GmbH, and the Miriam Makeba Estate, Miriam Makeba Trust and Miriam Makeba Foundation
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is G20?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- G20危機
- Lieux de tournage
- Le Cap, Afrique du Sud(location)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h 48m(108 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant