Dominatrix Rates 9 Dominatrix Scenes in Movies & TV

Name: Dominatrix Rates 9 Dominatrix Scenes in Movies & TV
Genre: Documentaire, Court métrage
Released: 2022-10-25
Duration: 15 min
Cast: Damiana Chi

Vidéo
2022
15m

MA NOTE

Courte Documentaire

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueProfessional dominatrix and certified sexologist Damiana Chi rates nine dominatrix scenes in movies and TV, such as "Euphoria," for realism. Chi breaks down the accuracy of ethics and safety... Tout lireProfessional dominatrix and certified sexologist Damiana Chi rates nine dominatrix scenes in movies and TV, such as "Euphoria," for realism. Chi breaks down the accuracy of ethics and safety procedures of BDSM scenes in "Euphoria" (2019), "Transparent" (2016), and "The Wolf of Wa... Tout lireProfessional dominatrix and certified sexologist Damiana Chi rates nine dominatrix scenes in movies and TV, such as "Euphoria," for realism. Chi breaks down the accuracy of ethics and safety procedures of BDSM scenes in "Euphoria" (2019), "Transparent" (2016), and "The Wolf of Wall Street" (2013). She looks at the plausibility of BDSM sessions in "Bonding" (2019), "Po... Tout lire

Star
- Damiana Chi

Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro

MA NOTE

Star
- Damiana Chi

1Commentaire d'utilisateur

Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro

Photos

Rôles principaux1

Modifier

Damiana Chi

Self - Professional Dominatrix
(as Mistress Damiana Chi)

Commentaires des utilisateurs1

Avis en vedette

2Musicianmagic

Useless YouTube video

This is a YouTube video (be warned there are almost as many commercial breaks as video) where Damiana Chi a professional Dominatrix gives her perspective on the accuracy in several TV show episodes and movies of Domination/Submission or Dominatrix/slave.

The first problem with this video is she hasn't watched the complete movies or TV episodes. Evidently, someone else gave her only partial scenes to critique. So much is taken out of context. She's not actually giving her opinion on complete TV shows or movies.

The second problem is what she is judging. Like giving high marks to one (I won't disclose here) because the whips on a wall look genuine including one similar to one of hers. While another she gives very low points for one instance of a whip landing in the wrong spot.

It was slightly interesting, so I will give 2 out of 10 for that. But otherwise credit little in value.