Inside with Jen Psaki

As a press secretary Psaki was miles above the current one. She was able to speak without a cue card and actually could stand on her own two feet with the best of the press. Unike the current one.

But the she saw the gilded calf and hopped over to cable TV for money. Can't blame her. Her job now is way easy and she's paid a lot.

She gets to have puff interviews and interactions with pundits and poliicians she agrees with. AND get paid in the process. How great is that? Low pressure. Great oneaty reward.

The problem witht he show is we already know the drill. We know what she stands for and where she stands. So it's just pablum for the baked in audience who already agrees with everything she says.

It's not journalism, so why pretend?

"Inside with Jen Psaki" stands at the crossroads of politics and media, presenting a unique case with former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki at the helm. While the show provides an insider's perspective, concerns persist about potential biases and ethical considerations associated with Psaki's transition. In light of these concerns, some viewers may find that Mehdi Hasan could offer a more compelling and credible alternative.

One of the notable drawbacks of "Inside with Jen Psaki" is its perceived alignment with a pro-Wall Street, anti-progressive stance, potentially limiting its appeal to a broader audience seeking diverse perspectives. Mehdi Hasan, known for his insightful takes and journalistic credibility, could offer a more balanced and nuanced approach to political analysis.

Psaki's seamless transition from Press Secretary to media personality raises questions about conflicts of interest that could inadvertently impact the show's ability to deliver unbiased reporting. Hasan, with his background in journalism and a reputation for critical thinking, might present a more transparent and independent perspective that resonates with viewers seeking credibility and integrity.

Similar to other politically-driven programs, "Inside with Jen Psaki" may face challenges in addressing biases towards influential entities. Hasan's experience and reputation for thought-provoking journalism could contribute to a more robust examination of powerful organizations, enhancing the show's overall credibility as an objective source of information.

Moreover, Hasan's potential as a host could provide a fresh perspective on international affairs, bringing a more balanced approach that avoids favoritism towards any specific country. This could strengthen the show's commitment to presenting a diverse and unbiased view of global events.

In conclusion, while "Inside with Jen Psaki" grapples with unique challenges, Mehdi Hasan emerges as a potential alternative host who could offer better takes and enhanced journalistic credibility. Hasan's reputation for thoughtful analysis and independence could address some of the concerns associated with the current show, providing viewers with a more well-rounded and objective viewing experience.

Wow if you want people to watch something, then the host has to be at least likeable. This has always and continues to be my problem with Psaki as any public facing personality. She is snotty, smug, rude, and apparently (surprise) is still a plant for her party. If you make it through one episode and feel like you learned something from the show, then good for you. I made it through bits and pieces that come up on tv and was kinda baffled anyone would want this bile spewing shrew and then you watch the show and can blatantly see the bias and agenda with the spin like all of the others. Did I mention she is unlikeable? Her on spectrum folksy character can't make its way thru her true personality which further drains any charm the show would have had lol. Thinly veiled fronts are thinly veiled fronts and the media is disgusting as always. Lots of opinion shows that are not news trying to masquerade as news....