Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhile serving as a juror in a high-profile murder trial, a family man finds himself struggling with a serious moral dilemma, one he could use to sway the jury verdict and potentially convict... Tout lireWhile serving as a juror in a high-profile murder trial, a family man finds himself struggling with a serious moral dilemma, one he could use to sway the jury verdict and potentially convict or free the wrong killer.While serving as a juror in a high-profile murder trial, a family man finds himself struggling with a serious moral dilemma, one he could use to sway the jury verdict and potentially convict or free the wrong killer.
- Réalisation
- Scénariste
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 4 victoires et 14 nominations au total
7,0118K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'Juror #2' is a compelling courtroom drama exploring justice and morality, directed by Clint Eastwood. Nicholas Hoult's performance is lauded, though some find the plot predictable. The film, featuring Toni Collette and J. K. Simmons, is a solid addition to Eastwood's work, though not his best. The direction and pacing are effective, yet some critics wish for deeper thematic exploration.
Avis en vedette
A house built on sand
I doubt that this case would ever have gone to trial. The only "witness" supposedly saw the suspect during a dark night, through heavy rain, from a couple of hundred feet away, right? If this case did make it to the courtroom, any halfway decent defense attorney would've knocked down the supposed validity of that witness without much trouble. There's nothing else to go on. The suspect followed her? How far? No one knows, which means that's of no value at all. If she was hit by a car, any autopsy would have shown this to have been the case, i.e. She was hit hard by a very large object... in other words, a vehicle, rather than a hand-held object. In summary, the direction, the actors and the production are all fine, but the whole film is a house built on a foundation that has no strength.
If this is his last, he's ending in a good place
Juror #2 , which may well be Clint Eastwood's last film as a director, is very good. We're not talking Unforgiven, Bronco Billy, Million Dollar Baby good, but it is properly good. Hard to tell you anything without spoiling it, but it's a great courtroom drama with a twist early on that takes it to a whole new place. You can relate to all the major characters, and even when they're doing not great things you can put yourself in your shoes and go I'd really struggle not to do that. Well worth a watch.
We don't have enough one and done dramas in the cinemas nowadays. This is exactly the kind of film we need more of. Very glad I saw it in the cinema.
We don't have enough one and done dramas in the cinemas nowadays. This is exactly the kind of film we need more of. Very glad I saw it in the cinema.
A solid if not exceptional effort
I saw this film at the premier in the TCL Chinese theater as the closing film of the AFI Film Festival of 2024. Nicholas Hoult stars as the titular character who is forced into a moral dilemma when he is chosen to be on a jury for a murder. The story is kind of a twist on the old Henry Fonda role in "12 Angry Men" of which I can't say more without creating a spoiler. Hoult's performance is more than adequate along with the rest of the stellar cast including Toni Collete as the prosecutor who is running for District Attorney, JK Simmons as Hoult's ally on the jury, Gabriel Basso as the defendant, and many others. The story and screenplay are involving with a few surprises although the inevitable conclusion is not. Eastwood's direction is solid as usual but not exceptional; however, given the constraints of the story I would say that it is more than fine. So, in summary this film is a 7/10, certainly not a 10/10 but not a 4/10 either (I reserve 4 and below ratings for films that are technically incompetent). Recommended if you can find it given Warner's lack of support for the film!
Wait for it... Nope, nothing
The title sounds like it would be a gripping, thrilling suspense flick. It wound up being a less than mediocre slow burn character building movie with too many holes to take seriously.
My husband and I were surprised to learn Clint Eastwood was involved, we would not have expected that. Some filming was creative and some scenes were impressive. However, many of the characters and their actions were not believable.
We got that the movie was supposed to create discussions afterwards, but it was more about how the movie went wrong in so many ways.
I don't understand how this is rated so highly. The premise was interesting but the execution lackluster.
We debated turning it off halfway through and I held onto hope that something exciting was going to happen but never did. It was a long set up for disappointment.
On the plus side, there were a lot of familiar faces cast, some performed better than others, but it's still nice to see a wide array of experienced actors.
My husband and I were surprised to learn Clint Eastwood was involved, we would not have expected that. Some filming was creative and some scenes were impressive. However, many of the characters and their actions were not believable.
We got that the movie was supposed to create discussions afterwards, but it was more about how the movie went wrong in so many ways.
I don't understand how this is rated so highly. The premise was interesting but the execution lackluster.
We debated turning it off halfway through and I held onto hope that something exciting was going to happen but never did. It was a long set up for disappointment.
On the plus side, there were a lot of familiar faces cast, some performed better than others, but it's still nice to see a wide array of experienced actors.
Justice morality combo Hooks you then twists and premature end.
This could have been so much more.
Reels you in, twists and turns of justice, morality and keeps you guessing, unfortunately it ends, without the ending expected.
I was very disappointed with the ending as it appeared to be taking another twist but just ends.
Hollywood and premature ending movies have to be the worst , however, it was enjoyable up to that. Bit of a slap in the face for such a lazy ending. This could have been so much more. It's a shame really.
The movie does have many qualities though and is worth a watch, it was fairly enjoyable, even intense at times and reels you in.
Give it a watch , enjoy.
Unfortunately could have been so much more.
Reels you in, twists and turns of justice, morality and keeps you guessing, unfortunately it ends, without the ending expected.
I was very disappointed with the ending as it appeared to be taking another twist but just ends.
Hollywood and premature ending movies have to be the worst , however, it was enjoyable up to that. Bit of a slap in the face for such a lazy ending. This could have been so much more. It's a shame really.
The movie does have many qualities though and is worth a watch, it was fairly enjoyable, even intense at times and reels you in.
Give it a watch , enjoy.
Unfortunately could have been so much more.
Blocage sonore
Prévisualisez la bande originale ici et continuez à écouter sur Amazon Music.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesKiefer Sutherland got his part by writing to Clint Eastwood telling him how big a fan of his he was, and that he wanted to star in one of his movies before he retired. Kiefer's dad, Donald Sutherland, had co-starred with Clint in De l'or pour les braves (1970) and Les pionniers de l'espace (2000).
- GaffesFaith cites her office's limited resources when arguing against a mistrial. This should have drawn a swift rebuke from the judge, who may only consider the motion on its merits.
- Citations
Larry Lasker: We're only as sick as our secrets.
- ConnexionsFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Best Movies of 2024 (2024)
- Bandes originalesHard Livin'
Written by Chris Stapleton and Kendell Marvel
Performed by Chris Stapleton
Courtesy of Mercury Nashville Records
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 30 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 27 300 000 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 54m(114 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant






