Depp V Heard

The content is there and, quite literally, writes itself. Rather than focus on the trial and major players, this documentary focuses on the impact social media had on the trial. To be honest, I found that to be the most annoying part of the actual trial. Everyone suddenly became an expert on civil cases and felt the world wanted to hear their opinion. This series goes from one nobody to the next, and their outlook and opinion on the case. NO ONE CARES! I wanted to hear more on the case itself, not from the nobodies with no legal expertise. Such a waste of a time, and had I know how bad it would be, I would never have watched.

It was interesting and fun to see many of the YouTube lawyers who covered this trial in this mini series, but that's about all. I don't think much of Netflix using their footage WITHOUT permission, and will be interested to see what happens with that.

Unfortunately this is yet another biased main stream media show trying to rehabilitate AH by cutting KEY moments of the trial out, to skew public opinion, and showing other parts to make AH look credible.

THIS is why I watched the trial. I was able to see EVERYTHING IN CONTEXT, and also see AH totally impeached on cross examination about her "story".

I've never been a big Depp fan, and I had not heard anything about Heard before, so I have no skin in this game. I wouldn't want to date Depp based on some of his behavior.... HOWEVER, it was really obvious that HE was the one abused, and AH was the abuser.

If you want the truth, and NOT someone's biased opinion, I suggest you go watch the trial which is available on YouTube, and form you own opinion.

I really struggled to watch this docuseries. As someone who watched every minute of the trial live, this depiction is biased and does not accurately reflect the events of the trial as they played out. Many moments of the trial have been used out of context to mislead the viewer regarding how poorly Amber actually came across while testifying. I would have preferred a more balanced account that considered the differences in the legal defences of the two sides. Johnny's team did not use social media to manipulate social media. Instead, people online following the trial were genuinely moved by the Depp defence and stood up for Johnny as a result.

Really? A dude dressed up as Deadpool is a commentator? They must have scoured the Internet for every wackadoodle with a YouTube page waiting for their 15 minutes.

Depp clearly has substance and anger issues. Heard *clearly* has a personality disorder. On the witness stand she's rehearsed and over-acts in her answers. It comes across like she embellished a LOT of her story, based on hers and Depp's arguments.

That pretty much speaks for the caliber of this, um,... "production". It's a bunch of yahoos offering commentary that just feeds the media circus. Skip it. Watch the actual footage and decide for yourself.

So the creator have to be a troll, made this just to make waves. People say we all got influenced my media and so on. But most of us watched live, everyday, every minute! We know better. Did she pay for this? This is not at all a objective documentary. Did the creator watch the trial, honestly? I personally started out on AH side, cause the media angle made think this was true. Then I watched the trial and everyday it turned me little by little. This undermineds the jury, the people that watched and him. It's a full documentary on gaslighting. Is it because he put it behind him and said no to be a part of the documentary?