Baby Cat

Nothing can prepare you for this movie. Nothing.

Your five year old cousin's son could operate a camera with more ability than the operator/s on this film.

The writer/director was either on drugs or undergoing rectal adjustment surgery during the process of writing and making this film.

The acting - I'm just kidding, there's no acting going on here. The cat chick is hot, that's about it.

Watching this film makes me wonder what its real purpose is because it was not made to entertain or engage an audience. It must be some kind of cover up job tax write-off thing.

Incredible. One of a kind. Unprecedented. Use this part of the review on the cover.

This movie came up randomly while watching Tubi and first I didn't like it but it held my attention. The rest of the day I kept thinking about it. The scenes between the protagonist and the cat were strangely touching so I am rewatching as I write. The actress impersonating the cat does such a good job. The weirdness is on par with David Lynch's strangeness without the all-consuming darkness and focuses on human connection instead. I like that the protagonists are female and queer and how the random misogyny at her awful job highlight the disconnect in her life.

What I don't like is that the score drowns out the dialog in a lot of scenes. And how long it took to reveal the connection between the parallel plot lines.

First I have to give credit to Natalie Cotter (Dana) and Fawn Winters (Cat). They gave their all in their roles in perhaps one of the worst movies ever made. Dana moves to LA, and works writing reports for an oil company. As an example of how bad the script it, she is stated as making reports of where to dig for oil. Oil is drilled! The office is a total joke. There is a back story of drugs, using stereotypes of mob activity. It is thrown in at random. When she opens her door, there is clearly green screen to show a balcony, except the scene jumps all over the place, and the hues change. The color hues also change in various scenes, and at least one green screen isn't even properly placed for being background. There are even place cards for scenes that are part of the movie. Some of the inserted scenes defy any logic. There is a difference between low budget and shear incompetence. This is the latter. There are movies that are so bad they are good. This one is simply bad. The two actors gave their all in their roles, so I will recognize that, and give it two stars. They aren't responsible for the incompetence.

A woman falls in love with a female who acts and dresses like a cat??!!!

Let's break down how I got to 6 stars:

Special effects - 0 stars. I've never seen worse green screens.

Plot - 2 stars. It actually made more sense (which is saying absolutely nothing) as it went along

Actors - 8 stars. They owned their roles, no matter how outlandish they might be. And it takes a special kind of courage to:

A. Dress and act and "speak" like a cat for an entire movie

B. Pretend to fall in love with a person who dresses, acts, and "speaks" like a cat for an entire movie.

Honestly, I could have stopped 10 minutes in and not think I missed anything. But the longer I watched, the more I appreciated what they we're trying to do.

Also, extra stars for the Lisa London appearance.

First you need to find and watch the absolutely worst movie Ed Wood Jr. Ever made. Then imagine a movie three hundred times worse than that and you will have Baby Cat.

It's absolute junk disguised as a movie. It's so bad that about a quarter of it is filmed in front of a green screen with images added to pretend to be the out doors, or other stuff. And people in their basement on youtube do a better job.

The direction is the pits. Some scenes are actually edited to zoom in on the action AFTER they were filmed. It's disorienting and unprofessional.

To be fair, the cat is hot, even if she does the worst cat impersonation on the planet Earth. But hot isnt enough to get over the horrible production "values," the lack of professional direction, the poor script and the lack of acting on a level above 3rd grade.

People who are giving this 10's or even 8's either didnt see the movie, or worked on it. There is no way anyone can give this a good score. It's dismal filmmaking at it's worst.