Czerwone maki

I was positively surprised with the style of this piece. It's not a quick paced war action movie. It's closer to classic war movies with their grim and realistic description of the frustration and disability to act due to different reasons (political and strategical reluctance to open the road to Rome in the allied Italian campaign of 1944).

Good acting, very good portrayal of the main characters. Nice change of perspective (from a civilian, anti-war adolescent point of view).

The scenography is great, the costumes and equipment are solid. The CGI is not bad.

Overal a strong 8. Worth watching and re-educating about the italian front of 1944.

Going own pace, not too flashingly dynamic, rather underscoring the dramatism of the fight. Special effects, especially CGI like Wojtek the bear could have been better but then again - not meant to be flashy, anyway. Closer to a Bridge too Far than Private Ryan. Some historic connotation better understood if one knows the background. Acting very good, historic characters well rendered, especially generals Maczek and Anders. Good idea of the plot, following a hypothetical side character and pretty neatly executed. Overall, decent but not too impressive, well composed. Some unnecessary shortcuts did to facilitate the story progress while sacrificing logic.

The film stands as a significant contribution to the genre of World War II cinema, focusing on the Battle of Monte Cassino - a pivotal and brutal confrontation often overshadowed in mainstream narratives. Its ambition to depict this historical event through the lens of a young Polish soldier offers a fresh perspective, diverging from the typical Western-centric portrayals.

Cinematographically, the film employs a palette that captures the starkness of war-torn landscapes, utilizing natural lighting to enhance realism. The camera work is intimate, often lingering on the protagonist's expressions, thereby humanizing the broader conflict. However, some battle sequences suffer from disorienting editing, making it challenging to follow the action coherently. This issue is reminiscent of certain scenes in "Fury" (2014), where rapid cuts occasionally hinder spatial awareness.

The sound design effectively immerses the audience in the chaos of battle, with a score that underscores the emotional gravity without becoming overbearing. The use of silence in certain scenes is particularly impactful, allowing moments of reflection amidst the turmoil.

In terms of performances, the lead actor delivers a compelling portrayal of a young man thrust into the horrors of war. His transformation is conveyed with subtlety, avoiding melodrama. Supporting roles are well-cast, with actors embodying their characters convincingly, contributing to the film's authenticity.

The production design deserves commendation for its meticulous attention to detail. Costumes and props accurately reflect the era, and the recreated settings of the Italian front are both immersive and historically faithful. The visual effects, particularly in large-scale battle scenes, are executed with a level of sophistication that enhances the narrative without drawing attention to themselves.

While the film excels in many technical aspects, its narrative pacing occasionally falters. Some scenes linger longer than necessary, potentially impacting audience engagement. Nevertheless, these moments are few and do not significantly detract from the overall experience.

Comparatively, the film aligns with works like "The Battle of Neretva" (1969) in its dedication to portraying lesser-known theaters of World War II with authenticity and respect. It avoids the romanticization of war, instead presenting a grounded and humanized account of soldiers' experiences.