Calendrier de lancementLes 250 meilleurs filmsFilms les plus populairesParcourir les films par genreBx-office supérieurHoraire des présentations et billetsNouvelles cinématographiquesPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    À l’affiche à la télévision et en diffusion en temps réelLes 250 meilleures séries téléÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreNouvelles télévisées
    À regarderBandes-annonces récentesIMDb OriginalsChoix IMDbIMDb en vedetteGuide du divertissement familialBalados IMDb
    OscarsBest Of 2025Holiday Watch GuideGotham AwardsPrix STARmeterCentre des prixCentre du festivalTous les événements
    Personnes nées aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesNouvelles des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l’industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de visionnement
Ouvrir une session
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'application
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Commentaires des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

L'effet Lazare

Titre original : The Lazarus Effect
  • 2015
  • 14A
  • 1h 23m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,2/10
48 k
MA NOTE
Sarah Bolger and Olivia Wilde in L'effet Lazare (2015)
A trailer for "The Lazarus Effect". (Unleashed.)
Liretrailer0:31
33 vidéos
99+ photos
Horreur avec tueur en sérieHorreur chez les adolescentsHorreur corporelleHorreur surnaturelleSuspense - MystèreHorreurMystèreScience-fictionThriller

Un groupe de chercheurs en médecine découvre un moyen de redonner vie à des patients décédés.Un groupe de chercheurs en médecine découvre un moyen de redonner vie à des patients décédés.Un groupe de chercheurs en médecine découvre un moyen de redonner vie à des patients décédés.

  • Réalisation
    • David Gelb
  • Scénaristes
    • Luke Dawson
    • Jeremy Slater
  • Vedettes
    • Olivia Wilde
    • Mark Duplass
    • Evan Peters
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
  • ÉVALUATION IMDb
    5,2/10
    48 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • David Gelb
    • Scénaristes
      • Luke Dawson
      • Jeremy Slater
    • Vedettes
      • Olivia Wilde
      • Mark Duplass
      • Evan Peters
    • 211Commentaires d'utilisateurs
    • 159Commentaires de critiques
    • 31Métascore
  • Voir l’information sur la production à IMDbPro
    • Prix
      • 2 nominations au total

    Vidéos33

    Trailer
    Trailer 0:31
    Trailer
    Trailer
    Trailer 0:30
    Trailer
    Trailer
    Trailer 0:30
    Trailer
    Trailer
    Trailer 0:30
    Trailer
    Official Trailer
    Trailer 1:42
    Official Trailer
    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:20
    Official Trailer
    Did I Just Die
    Clip 1:28
    Did I Just Die

    Photos122

    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    Voir l’affiche
    + 116
    Voir l’affiche

    Distribution principale17

    Modifier
    Olivia Wilde
    Olivia Wilde
    • Zoe
    Mark Duplass
    Mark Duplass
    • Frank
    Evan Peters
    Evan Peters
    • Clay
    Sarah Bolger
    Sarah Bolger
    • Eva
    Donald Glover
    Donald Glover
    • Niko
    Ray Wise
    Ray Wise
    • Mr. Wallace
    Scott Sheldon
    Scott Sheldon
    • Security Guard
    Emily Kelavos
    Emily Kelavos
    • Little Girl
    James Earl
    James Earl
    • Security Guard Terrence
    Amy Aquino
    Amy Aquino
    • President Dailey
    Sean T. Krishnan
    Sean T. Krishnan
    • Lawyer
    Ator Tamras
    Ator Tamras
    • Burned Figure
    Cato
    • Rocky the Dog
    Liisa Cohen
    Liisa Cohen
    • Cop
    • (uncredited)
    Jennifer Floyd
    • Firefighter
    • (uncredited)
    Bruno Gunn
    Bruno Gunn
    • Fireman
    • (uncredited)
    Scott L. Treger
    • Living Cadaver
    • (uncredited)
    • Réalisation
      • David Gelb
    • Scénaristes
      • Luke Dawson
      • Jeremy Slater
    • Tous les acteurs et membres de l'équipe
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Commentaires des utilisateurs211

    5,248.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis en vedette

    4filipemanuelneto

    A decent horror movie that starts out great but then loses quality.

    When I found this film, I thought it would be a cinematic approach to Lazarus Syndrome, which is the apparently spontaneous reactivation of the heartbeat after all attempts to resuscitate a patient in cardiac arrest have failed. This is a very rare situation to happen, and I thought the movie would be about that. I was wrong.

    The film's script follows a small group of young scientists who are carrying out a controversial and eventually revolutionary study: the creation of a serum that allows the dead to be reanimated. They are testing it on animals, but a bureaucratic twist ends up denying them the possibility of continuing the study. However, they decide to continue secretly, even though the results of tests on animals have revealed that there are dangerous brain changes, resulting from the application of the serum, in the resuscitated animals. After breaking into the lab at night, the group has an accident and one of the group's scientists dies. They then decide to use the serum to bring her back to life.

    The film has an interesting base premise and one that will draw some inspiration from the source of "Frankenstein" and other mad or amoral scientists. These are fascinating and frightening topics, because we naturally fear those men who use their genius and wisdom without any moral concern to guide them. However, the film fails to develop this in the best way: the whole question that leads to the expulsion of the scientists from that laboratory is, to say the least, unconvincing, and any minimally serious scientist would be incapable of performing an experiment on human beings without solid positive results in the previous stages. It is a huge nonsense that tramples everything we consider as a "scientific method".

    The cast has its good moments. Olivia Wilde does a really good job, she's convincing, and it's not difficult to sympathize with her character, for her stubbornness and sympathy. Mark Duplass didn't seem so committed or believable to me, but he has some very good moments, particularly in the second half of the film. Sarah Bolger (who I only knew from her role in the "Tudors" series) is beautiful, but in addition to her feminine beauty, she also gives us a mature and interesting interpretation, particularly in the final scenes of the film.

    On a technical level, the film doesn't have much to offer us. The cinematography is fairly generic, and the editing appears to have been harsh, with mangled subplots and a total runtime reduced to just over an hour. The sets are good enough, especially the labs used in the filming, and the soundtrack is good enough, though not remarkable.
    Michael_Elliott

    A Few Interesting Ideas Ruined by Poor Execution

    The Lazarus Effect (2015)

    ** (out of 4)

    A group of scientist discover a formula that could help bring the dead back to life. The main scientist Frank (Mark Duplass) and his fiancé (Olivia Wilde) mess up when signing their contract and end up getting kicked out of the laboratory. Needing to get enough of their records to carry on, the group sneak back into the lab but after an accident Frank's fiancé is killed. They decide to use the formula to bring her back to life but things don't go as planned.

    THE LAZARUS EFFECT has a few interesting ideas and some great performances, which keep it from being a complete trainwreck but there's no question that the film doesn't take its subject serious enough to have the film work. There's no question that there are elements of FLATLINERS here but people will also be thinking of LUCY, which was released the previous year as this film.

    It should be noted that without the end credits this movie runs just 76 minutes, which is extremely short in today's time. I personally love shorter movies but this one here is just so uneven that the film pretty much ends just as you feel it should be taking off. I say that because there are some interesting ideas about Heaven and Hell here but sadly very few of them are fully explored because once the fiancé is brought back to life the film turns into a rather generic horror movie. I'm not sure why the screenplay would introduce such good idea but then not do anything with them and especially since the film is so short and could have been expanded on.

    The performances in the film is what save it and help carry the material. Both Duplass and Wilde are very good and especially believable in their roles. Supporting players Sarah Bolger, Evan Peters and Donald Glover are also very good. Technically speaking the film features a nice score, good cinematography and the director certainly makes a professional looking film. With that said, THE LAZARUS EFFECT completely falls apart during the final fifteen minutes, which is a real shame.
    4Drive-in_Zeppelin

    Schlocky Horror films are the best kind of Horror films.

    First of all, you'll probably get more entertainment out of these user reviews than you will by seeing the actual movie. To clarify...aren't all possession movies inherently pro-Christian since the inclusion of demons and hell implies that there is are angels and heaven (since Lucifer was cast out of heaven and became the devil)?

    As someone that has seen lot of REALLY bad horror films, I can safely say that The Lazarus Effect isn't all that bad. It's got a pretty decent cast in Mark Duplass and Olivia Wilde, but it's a cheap horror film. You get the predictable jump-scares, you get the dialed in dialogue, what else did you expect?

    You don't go to see horror films because they're particularly well written or original. This movie is literally just a hodgepodge of movies like: Carrie, Lucy (the whole 10% of your brain thing), The Phoenix Project, Pet Semetary, Flatliners, etc.

    I actually somewhat enjoyed this, but you realistically need to set your expectations 6 feet under. Maybe this film will find a way to resurrect some of your faith in the horror genre that way. It sure as hell isn't going to resurrect the $10 bucks you spent on the ticket at the theater.

    Additionally, what ever happened to the novelty of watching a film before reviewing it?

    Read the full review and others like it on the Drive-in Zeppelin website
    6abouhelier-r

    The Lazarus Effect

    A group of medical students discover a way to bring dead patients back to life.

    The Lazarus Effect stars Olivia Wilde, Mark Duplass, Evan Peters, Sarah Polger and is directed by David Gelb. This is another horror movie and we've seen those couple of jump scares before; but it does have some very creepy imagery and when this start happening it's not that bad. The film deals with a theory debating whether when you die some chemical elements in your brain make you see the white light at the end of the tunnel or you actually go to heaven and this stage is just some kind of process to enter it. In fact, it has you wondering is she possessed or is she just unlocking her brain and that's what triggers this weird version of herself? However, it's not giving you enough information to let you decide what's actually going on. Ultimately The Lazarus Effect feels like a horror version of Lucy but messier this time with some horror things happening in order to to keep the audience entertained for what it is. Sometimes it tries to be smart but gives you conflicting information and then you're lost, it doesn't quiet know where to go. Finally, actors are functional, especially Evan Peters who has some pretty good lines and clearly is the comic relief in the movie.

    Overall The Lazarus Effect is more or less what you expect it to be, an horror movie with some jump scares as usual but with some pretty cool and relevant imagery. It's an effective but very messy movie.
    4avdropm-944-921852

    Never quite makes up its mind what story to tell

    Any five to ten minute excerpt from this movie could easily lead a viewer to conclude that this is a well made horror or suspense thriller. The production values are high, the performances good, and so on.

    The problem is that the parts of the film don't fit together. The sequence of action has the usual slow build and accelerating pace of any good thriller, but while the set-up is promising, and the events proceed logically enough as interesting and sympathetic characters are frightened, threatened or killed off, the reasons underlying the events remain obscure.

    Hints and suggestive exposition are introduced, and then forgotten. There are explicit references to religious-themed horror fantasy, speculative science, and even a few elements of a possible conspiracy. An elaborate backstory is gradually revealed, and then abruptly dismissed. The conclusion doesn't really conclude anything: there's a decisive ending, but no resolution, no revelation, not even a clear idea of the probable consequences.

    It's possible a re-edit could address these issues and make it a decent film. As it stands, though, it just doesn't work.

    Blumhouse Horror Films, Ranked by IMDb Rating

    Blumhouse Horror Films, Ranked by IMDb Rating

    Blumhouse Productions has been a major force in the horror genre since 2007's Paranormal Activity became a worldwide sensation. See how IMDb users rank all of Blumhouse's horror movies since 2007.
    See the rankings
    Production art
    Liste

    Plus de résultats de ce genre

    Jessabelle
    5,4
    Jessabelle
    Incarnate
    5,3
    Incarnate
    La potence
    4,3
    La potence
    Demonic
    5,3
    Demonic
    Le projet Lazarus
    6,0
    Le projet Lazarus
    Ouija
    4,5
    Ouija
    Oculus
    6,5
    Oculus
    Ciel obscur
    6,3
    Ciel obscur
    Faites un Voeu
    5,1
    Faites un Voeu
    Stephanie
    5,8
    Stephanie
    Mercy
    4,9
    Mercy
    The Lazarus Effect
    6,3
    The Lazarus Effect

    Intérêts connexes

    Roger Jackson in Frissons (1996)
    Horreur avec tueur en série
    Jennifer Love Hewitt and Freddie Prinze Jr. in Le pacte du silence (1997)
    Horreur chez les adolescents
    Jeff Goldblum in La mouche (1986)
    Horreur corporelle
    Daveigh Chase in Le cercle (2002)
    Horreur surnaturelle
    James Stewart in Fenêtre sur cour (1954)
    Suspense - Mystère
    Mia Farrow in Le bébé de Rosemary (1968)
    Horreur
    Jack Nicholson and Faye Dunaway in Chinatown (1974)
    Mystère
    James Earl Jones and David Prowse in La guerre des étoiles V: L'empire contre-attaque (1980)
    Science-fiction
    Cho Yeo-jeong in Parasite (2019)
    Thriller

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      The statement that humans only use 10% of their brain is a common urban myth that scientists of that caliber would have known. It refers to unused potential. In fact, brain scans have shown that no matter what you are doing all parts of the brain are active, though some are more active than others--which is explained in this movie by Niko.
    • Gaffes
      During the experiments on the pig and the dog, it is stated that the Lazarus drug needs to be injected into their temporal lobes. However, when they are trying to bring Zoe back, the needle is in fact inserted into her frontal lobe. The temporal lobe on a human is farther back and lower.
    • Citations

      Zoe: I went somewhere.

      Frank: That was a dream!

      Zoe: No, it was hell!

    • Connexions
      Featured in Half in the Bag: 2015 Re-Cap (So Far) (2015)
    • Bandes originales
      Nanny Version
      Written by Coxsone Dodd (as Clement Dodd)

      Performed by Dennis Alcapone

      Courtesy of Studio One

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ19

    • How long is The Lazarus Effect?Propulsé par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 27 février 2015 (Canada)
    • Pays d’origine
      • United States
    • Sites officiels
      • Official Facebook
      • Official site (Japan)
    • Langue
      • English
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • The Lazarus Effect
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Santa Clarita, Californie, États-Unis(College of the Canyons)
    • sociétés de production
      • Lionsgate
      • Blumhouse Productions
      • Chapter One Films
    • Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 3 300 000 $ US (estimation)
    • Brut – États-Unis et Canada
      • 25 801 570 $ US
    • Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
      • 10 203 437 $ US
      • 1 mars 2015
    • Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
      • 38 356 892 $ US
    Voir les informations détaillées sur le box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 1h 23m(83 min)
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Dolby Digital
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la façon de contribuer
    Modifier la page

    En découvrir davantage

    Consultés récemment

    Veuillez activer les témoins du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. Apprenez-en plus.
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Connectez-vous pour plus d’accèsConnectez-vous pour plus d’accès
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Télécharger l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Données IMDb de licence
    • Salle de presse
    • Publicité
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une entreprise d’Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.