Atrapados

Investigative journalist Ema Garay is relentless in trying to discover what happened to seventeen year old Martina, an enquiry that leads to some shocking revelations and places her in mortal danger.

It's a good watch, if you're used to The British adaptations of Harlen Coben's books, it will feel very different, not just because of the language or location, it just feels different, maybe a little darker or grittier.

It's a book I read some time ago and all but forgotten, it deals with some pretty grim subjects, some now considered slightly taboo, possibly too controversial to warrant a British production.

Mystery and intrigue all the way, just when you think you know what's going on, you're thrown a curve ball, they definitely make you wait.

I've read some criticism about the central character Ema, but I liked her, sure she's flawed, but that's human nature, she is one dogged journalist, I thought Soledad Villamil was excellent.

It looks really good and I love the setting, Argentina looks so cool, the visuals are strong the whole way through, a real feature.

7/10.

This showed promise at the beginning, but it required way too much suspension of disbelief. Were the police incompetent, or corrupt? An Investigative reporter given free rein to explore the crime scene? This is one series which could have used the usual Netflix Rainbow- United-Nations-Diversity Casting method. The early problem with this is that so many characters are introduced and they all look alike. It was hard to follow who was with whom? The women are all the same build, with long black hair, olive complexions and heavy eyebrows. With a couple exceptions, the men have short-cropped grey/salt and pepper hair with matching short cropped, gray/ salt and pepper beards. The teenage boys all look like Raj from the "Big Bang Theory." Until the finale- I couldn't tell Bruno from Armando from Gael. Maybe that was the point, since apparently everyone in town had something to do with the crimes- why not make them all look alike? A lost opportunity here. The final twist was obvious from the beginning- did the police investigate at all?

First off I'm argentinian, so this may be a little biased. You have been warned.

When I started watching this series I thought it would be the typical missing girl movie/series. I don't wanna spoil anything, but let's just say it's not what it may seem at first look...in a good way. You think you know what's happening and then it takes some very unexpected turns.

The story is ultimately not "shocking", but I think that's something good, it ads to its overall credibility.

Acting is decent. Dialogues are reasonably good and credible (as a lawyer I found some police lines kinda dumb, but that's unavoidable in a work of fiction) music is ok, photography is good.

I would recommend this. It's not one of the best series out there, but it's well above average, especially for Netflix standards.

I was pretty intrigued after episode 1. The plot was solid with a lot of different ways the story could go and plenty of characters to keep you guessing. After that first episode however the execution was unfortunately pretty awful.

I kept having to remind myself that the main character was a journalist and not a cop because the amount of access this woman gets as events unfold in active investigations is that of only those actually investigating the crimes. That aspect alone was frustrating because the show is so focused on the main character. She is increasingly frustrating to watch as the show continues, making very cliche poor decisions. The conclusion is unpredictable, so it gets points for that, although admittedly by the end I was just finishing the show for the sake of finishing it.

I'll give it a couple of points because Argentina does look quite pretty. I usually give extra points for things like settings and costumes, et cetera those might be the only points it gets.

I haven't read any Harlen Coben in a long time but I used to love his books because he was able to put in a plausible twist at the end which made sense and wasn't a lame cop out. The books were logical and coherent with characters of enough depth that there could be a backstory somewhere to make them a killer. As someone who almost always can guess who done it, it's a refreshing change to have a mystery I can't guess.

This was absolutely stupid. Discount all of the normally stupid stuff which could potentially happen when making a film. It is better than that. But instead they have the main character do something so absolutely incredibly stupid which is a repeat of something incredibly stupid she did before, with very bad consequences. I do so badly want to say what it was, because we are SO ANNOYED at wading through 7 episodes (not the most entertaining series) for this absolutely most implausible & moronic event with only the last episode left.

Unless that plot twist happens, my husband guessed correctly, but no matter who did it, this scene was just idiotic.

I think these reviews are not editable, so I will have to leave you with the visual of my husband saying, "we are not going to watch that last episode now because I am so angry at how utterly ridiculous that was, " standing up, leaving the room. I saw him through the patio doors with garden utensils in hand. He hates gardening & rarely does it. So that is saying something.

End result, there was a twist ending that neither of us predicted. It was plausible, but still stupid. It makes Argentinian women look pretty stupid and/or thoughtless impulsive, tbh. I don't think they are, so either Coben or the movie misjudged.

I'll be interested if anyone says the book is any different or if maybe people don't feel it's as stupid as we do.