Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueFollows Caligula as he kills his devious adoptive grandfather and takes control of the decadent Roman Empire, spiralling into depravity, devastation, and madness.Follows Caligula as he kills his devious adoptive grandfather and takes control of the decadent Roman Empire, spiralling into depravity, devastation, and madness.Follows Caligula as he kills his devious adoptive grandfather and takes control of the decadent Roman Empire, spiralling into depravity, devastation, and madness.
Malcolm McDowell
- Caligula
- (archive footage)
Helen Mirren
- Caesonia
- (archive footage)
Teresa Ann Savoy
- Drusilla
- (archive footage)
Peter O'Toole
- Tiberius
- (archive footage)
John Gielgud
- Nerva
- (archive footage)
Guido Mannari
- Macro
- (archive footage)
Giancarlo Badessi
- Claudius
- (archive footage)
Bruno Brive
- Gemellus
- (archive footage)
Adriana Asti
- Ennia
- (archive footage)
Leopoldo Trieste
- Charicles
- (archive footage)
Paolo Bonacelli
- Chaerea
- (archive footage)
John Steiner
- Longinus
- (archive footage)
Mirella D'Angelo
- Livia
- (archive footage)
Donato Placido
- Proculus
- (archive footage)
Osiride Pevarello
- Giant
- (archive footage)
John Francis Lane
- Major Domo
- (archive footage)
Eduardo Bergara Leumann
- Bergarius
- (archive footage)
Andrew Lord Miller
- Senator Acesius
- (archive footage)
Avis en vedette
A movie that needs getting used to. But also somehow fascinating.
In the opening credits, it's explained that the film was financed and produced by the founder of Hustler magazine, who originally had high ambitions for the film. Renowned actors like Malcolm McDowell, Peter O'Toole, Helen Mirren, and John Gielgud were cast, the screenplay was written by writer Gore Vidal, and Tinto Brass directed. But Brass was fired towards the end, the final script was butchered during editing, arbitrary sex scenes were inserted, and some contributors didn't want to be mentioned in the credits afterwards.
I watched the three-hour Ultimate Cut from 2023, which tried to reconstruct the film as much as possible as it was originally intended. And what should I say, it was still quite intense in terms of violence and sex depiction. McDowell has no problem with difficult and harsh roles, he had already proven as Alex in Stanley Kubricks "A Clockwork Orange". The cast of, for example, O'Toole on the other hand surprised me a bit. Some scenes must have been quite a challenge to shoot. But well, Caligula was a tyrant who was probably also mentally disturbed, maybe the depictions weren't all that exaggerated after all.
The Roman Empire naturally offers a lot in terms of stories and characters. Visually, I find that the film does make a lot of impact (if you leave the perversions aside for now). And I like historical stuff and films of the sword-and-sandal subgenre a lot. I'd also be tempted to watch the normal version sometime for comparison. Not a film for everyone, like "Antichrist" or also "Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom", you have to be able to handle it, and I understand all too well that people don't like films of this kind - as a movie buff, I find you can take a look if you're not too sensitive - 7/10.
In the opening credits, it's explained that the film was financed and produced by the founder of Hustler magazine, who originally had high ambitions for the film. Renowned actors like Malcolm McDowell, Peter O'Toole, Helen Mirren, and John Gielgud were cast, the screenplay was written by writer Gore Vidal, and Tinto Brass directed. But Brass was fired towards the end, the final script was butchered during editing, arbitrary sex scenes were inserted, and some contributors didn't want to be mentioned in the credits afterwards.
I watched the three-hour Ultimate Cut from 2023, which tried to reconstruct the film as much as possible as it was originally intended. And what should I say, it was still quite intense in terms of violence and sex depiction. McDowell has no problem with difficult and harsh roles, he had already proven as Alex in Stanley Kubricks "A Clockwork Orange". The cast of, for example, O'Toole on the other hand surprised me a bit. Some scenes must have been quite a challenge to shoot. But well, Caligula was a tyrant who was probably also mentally disturbed, maybe the depictions weren't all that exaggerated after all.
The Roman Empire naturally offers a lot in terms of stories and characters. Visually, I find that the film does make a lot of impact (if you leave the perversions aside for now). And I like historical stuff and films of the sword-and-sandal subgenre a lot. I'd also be tempted to watch the normal version sometime for comparison. Not a film for everyone, like "Antichrist" or also "Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom", you have to be able to handle it, and I understand all too well that people don't like films of this kind - as a movie buff, I find you can take a look if you're not too sensitive - 7/10.
Now I'll be honest, I think John Hurt ("I Claudius" - BBC - 1976) made a better Caligula, but Malcolm McDowell is still pretty convincing as the despotic sexual deviant who held the ultimate power in the Roman Empire for four years. It ought not to have been a surprise that he turned out the way he did when we are introduced to the decrepitly monstrous Tiberius (Peter O'Toole) on his island paradise of Capri. He lives there in a court of acolyte nymphs and "fishes" guided only by the vaguest semblance of decency from his friend Nerva (Sir John Gielgud). When that brief sequence of hedonism is swiftly over, our antihero assumes the throne and proceeds to share it with his sister Drusilla (Teresa Ann Savoy) with whom he enjoys a pretty incestuous relationship. There's pressure on him to marry, though, and father a legitimate child - so along comes Caesonia (Helen Mirren) - a woman all too keen to father the imperial progeny whilst enjoying a life of luxury and depravity. That's the history bit - which is really all rather peripheral to this shockingly scripted exercise in soft-porn which we are now going to watch in all it's three hour glory. It's clear that no expense has been spared on the look of the film, and to be fair to director Tinto Brass he does offer us quite a convincing glimpse at the excessiveness of a despotic court ruled by a monarch who believed himself a god - and who had few prepared to argue. It's maybe on that last point that "Longinus" (John Steiner) takes a decisive stance. He is the chancellor who increasingly finds himself, along with Praetorian Commander Chaerea (Paolo Bonacelli), more and more disgusted by the antics of this man with the thinnest grasp on reality. There's nudity all over the shop to the point that it becomes innocuous and once you've got used to that the rest of it fails to carry what could have been a blank cheque opportunity to portray the pivot of historical decadence. Instead, we have McDowell hamming it up energetically as he flounces around, scantily clad, but very little else. It's tawdry, no other word for it - and the unwelcome intermission completely throttled whatever pace there was as it sort of lumbered along in the most clunky of episodic fashions to an denouement that history told us about nearly two thousand years ago. It doesn't seem to know whether it's a movie or a sequence of short theatrical plays, Mirren adds precisely nothing and the magnificently odious O'Toole isn't around long enough to make enough of a difference. It's a shambles, certainly, and this ultimate cut is far, far too long - but somehow it's not unwatchable. You might never eat cottage cheese again!
Caligula is a film with a storied history. What began as a sprawling historical epic saw much of the film land on the cutting room floor. In its place, a violent and pornographic cash-grab that bore little resemblance to the script by Gore Vidal. Though a box office success, thanks to the controversy surrounding the film, critics derided it, and the cast disowned it. Now, forty-four years later, Caligula: The Ultimate Cut intends to showcase the film's original vision-a riveting and complex historical drama showcasing the intoxicating allure of sexuality and power. The film runs nearly three hours, is entirely fascinating, and delivers a triumphant expose on how 'absolute power corrupts absolutely.' In an era of director's cuts and alternate versions, Caligula is a magnificent restoration with a triumphant zeal.
Full Review: Geek Vibes Nation.
Full Review: Geek Vibes Nation.
I watched Caligula for the first time in July 2023. Shortly after, I found out about a new version that had premiered at Cannes, but wasn't available to stream or purchase.
I did my research, found out about the man in charge of this restoration, Thomas Negovan, subscribed to his youtube and Patreon and just kept checking from time to time to see when I would finally be able to watch this.
The time finally came. This is a much better movie. It flows a lot better. Caligula's descend into madness and fear is far far better shown.
All of the new scenes are excellent. When you watch them, you realize how so many of the scenes in the original version were cut short.
For example, near the end, at the dinner after Britain's ''conquer'', in the original version he suddenly yells ''CRAWL CRAWL CRAWL!'', doesn't make a lot of sense. But in this new cut, they added the entire scene in which Caligula was playing ''Caesar says'' and commanding the people there to do different things. Such as ''Caesar says turn right, caesar says hop'' He finally snaps and that's when he screams ''CRAWL CRAWL CRAWL'' Just one of many examples.
There are however, a few things I liked more in the original. The final shot for example. It showed the blood dripping down the stairs with the dead bodies lying there, I think it is a great final shot. In this new cut they removed that.
I also miss the music from the original opening and the phrase that appears :''For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?''
The music in this new version was a bit tame in my opinion.
All the long porn scenes have been removed, no more 10 minute long blowjobs. However, I believe there were a few highly explicit very short scenes that I believe should have been left in. I think that explicitness added a lot.
I don't think it is a perfect film, but it is definitely superior to the original. You get a lot a lot more character development, overall, it just flows better.
I did my research, found out about the man in charge of this restoration, Thomas Negovan, subscribed to his youtube and Patreon and just kept checking from time to time to see when I would finally be able to watch this.
The time finally came. This is a much better movie. It flows a lot better. Caligula's descend into madness and fear is far far better shown.
All of the new scenes are excellent. When you watch them, you realize how so many of the scenes in the original version were cut short.
For example, near the end, at the dinner after Britain's ''conquer'', in the original version he suddenly yells ''CRAWL CRAWL CRAWL!'', doesn't make a lot of sense. But in this new cut, they added the entire scene in which Caligula was playing ''Caesar says'' and commanding the people there to do different things. Such as ''Caesar says turn right, caesar says hop'' He finally snaps and that's when he screams ''CRAWL CRAWL CRAWL'' Just one of many examples.
There are however, a few things I liked more in the original. The final shot for example. It showed the blood dripping down the stairs with the dead bodies lying there, I think it is a great final shot. In this new cut they removed that.
I also miss the music from the original opening and the phrase that appears :''For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?''
The music in this new version was a bit tame in my opinion.
All the long porn scenes have been removed, no more 10 minute long blowjobs. However, I believe there were a few highly explicit very short scenes that I believe should have been left in. I think that explicitness added a lot.
I don't think it is a perfect film, but it is definitely superior to the original. You get a lot a lot more character development, overall, it just flows better.
Having looked at the laserdisc R-rated version, the "Imperial" unrated version and the documentary promotional short featuring Guccione and Vidal attempting to explain, I find it very hard to see the "Ultimate Cut" as the new movie it is supposed to be. It does indeed appear to be made of elements previously unseen. This was never a terrible, but an unfortunate movie, born crippled over and over. We may never see the 4 hour masterpiece that (perhaps) could have been. In this version there is much to like, much beauty and humor. Maybe not the best takes, or camera angles, but more story. The whole thing makes more sense. Not subtle, but fun. Happily the actors have loads more screen time. Teresa Ann Savoy isn't just pretty and likable. As Caligula's calculating, patient, loving sister, she helps so much! If you have ever dreamed of being a movie editor because it looks easy, this movie and its difficulties will enhance your respect for the editor's art. Enjoy it some time when the children and the easily offended are not around.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film is a complete re-imagination of Caligola (1979), based on 96 hours of never-before-seen footage recovered many years after its release. Under the supervision of historian Thomas Negovan, an "Ultimate Cut" of the film was created. Instead of expanding existing scenes with the new footage, the entire film was edited from scratch, which resulted in a version that doesn't contain a single frame from the theatrical version. Visual effects were used to enhance scenes and replace cheap sets and backgrounds, and AI technology was used to restore previously unusable dialogue that was plagued with background noises. A new music score was composed as well, in contrast to the public domain ballet music. A limited theatrical release was planned in late 2020, but it was delayed due to legal difficulties, distribution issues and the Covid-19 pandemic. This version eventually premiered at the Cannes Film Festival in 2023, with high remarks by actors Malcolm McDowell (who previously had been ashamed by the film) and Dame Helen Mirren.
- GaffesAs Macro rises from the bed on which the slain corpse of Tiberius (Peter O'Toole) lies, it is glaringly obvious that 'the dead body' is breathing.
- ConnexionsEdited from Caligola (1979)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 76 031 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 30 815 $ US
- 18 août 2024
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 93 772 $ US
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant