Le sac noir

It's no surprise that IMDB ratings are so different and it seems nobody can agree if the film was good or bad. It seems we cannot agree on anything anymore. I fear the people giving all these 1 or 3's don't even watch the movies. It's like the people who go and rate a series after 1 episode. I don't fully blame them as I do IMDB because they allow it. I used to really take IMDB user reviews to heart when I was choosing to watch a film, but I can no longer. Maybe it's people with short attention spans or because it's not a Marvel Comics film.

Black Bag is directed by the great Steven soderbergh and has a phenomenal cast. It's a spy film and the story isn't the most original one but it was a good movie. Solid plot and keeps your attention throughout the film. I just don't see how someone could rate it so poorly. It seems we cannot even agree that a good movie is good lol. You used to search for a film like "blow" for instance snd the vast majority were 8-10 because I think normal people will agree it's a great film. Now if a movie is great (which is not often) we still have people giving it a 1 rating. I either totally lost my taste in films or people are not watching movies and shows they are rating. IMDB has lost its purpose because I'm thinking the tic tok generation and their lack of ability to watch anything past 45 seconds .black bag isn't a great movie by any means but it's also not bad ,especially by today's standards.

I have to confess that I have tried my best to sit through watching it, but I failed...gladly.

I don't know why this movie, with several men and women sitting around a dinner table, kept blabbering to each other, would cost and consume 50 million dollars to make. How much did the producers pay each of these actors to sit down? Maybe they spent a lot of the movie budget just for the black plastic glass frame for the guy, even if it looked so unnecessary and so fake on his face?

I have also found that the dialogue of this movie is just so irrelevant to me. I couldn't even understand what it meant, maybe not just to the participant actors who could ingeniously memorize the wtf? Dialogue, but to a lot of the viewers, including me. I have watched some movies with only two actors sitting facing each other and talking from the very beginning to the end, but I found them so interesting and never lost my focus. But the dialogue of this Black Bag, with more people talking to each other, I didn't even know what they were talking about and couldn't care less.

Black Bag (2025) would be one of the most tedious and meaningless movies that I have watched in the last 50 years.

Cate Blanchett didn't age well and did an abysmal facelift job that almost made her unrecognizable and tough to look at.

I find myself increasingly weary of the spy film genre, especially those that center around a romantic couple. It has become a trope so familiar, so predictable, that the very notion of it now feels like an exercise in the mundane. Each iteration feels almost mechanically constructed, as if there is an unspoken formula at play, one that prioritizes style over substance, a kind of cinematic sleight of hand designed to keep the audience distracted from the lack of originality beneath the surface. In this particular instance, however, the dialogue attempts to elevate itself above the usual banter of its kind, but only to the point of indulging in an almost ostentatious, borderline pretentious, air of intellectualism. There's a certain artifice to it all-an effort to sound clever, to sound profound, that ultimately rings hollow. The conversations between the characters, rather than offering any real emotional depth or compelling insight, instead feel like performative displays of wit, which do little more than alienate rather than engage. This was a film that seemed more concerned with showcasing its own perceived sophistication than with crafting any meaningful connection with its audience. And yet, despite all its verbal flourishes, it never once managed to grasp my attention in any truly significant way. The pacing felt sluggish, the stakes hardly compelling, and the emotional core-if one could even call it that-was so underdeveloped it barely registered. In the end, it was less a work of cinema and more an exercise in style over substance, one that never captured my imagination or curiosity.

There's just about enough intrigue in David Koepp's efficient script to hold the attention in trying to decipher what is going on in Steven Soderbergh's underwhelming spy thriller which is more like a theatrical play than a cinematic experience.

All of the assembled cast do a sufficient job in delivering a very talky script. I especially liked Michael Fassbender's concise and measured performance as the spy ordered to get to the bottom of a leaked top secret software program that could jeopardise national security where his wife, Cate Blanchett, is one of the suspects.

For me Soderbergh never quite scratches my itch when he attempts to do 'cool' like he did with the Ocean trilogy. There's a cold aloofness that prevents me as a viewer to get completely wrapped up in the story he is trying to tell. Also with Black Bag I wasn't keen on the cinematography which looked like a creative decision to make most light sources seem diffused, presumably to make this look like an old fashioned espionage thriller from the 1960's. Fassbenders character certainly has shades of Harry Palmer to him, especially wearing those trademark black glasses.

Despite it being talky and smart it's not that taut and I would like to have seen a bit more action and a few surprise twists for there to be a better payoff for all the concentration the viewer has to endure to get to a rather mediocre finale.

And now...a film for adults.

Amidst the sequels, Super Hero Flicks, gratuitous violence and horror films, an original I. P. film with A-List stars, an interesting script and a good director has, somehow, snuck it's way into our local Mega-plex.

And...BLACK BAG is well worth your time.

Directed by Steven Soderbergh (ERIN BROCKOVICH), BLACK BAG is based on an original script by David Koepp (the first Tom Cruise MISSION IMPOSSIBLE film) and tells the tale of a British Spy (Michael Fassbender) who must ferret out a traitor in their midst amongst 5 potential candidates - one of which is his wife (Cate Blanchett).

And not a shootout in site!

This might seem like a set-up similar to the Brad Pitt/Angelina Jolie shoot-em-up MR. & MRS. SMITH from 2005, but instead of resorting to violence the spies in this thriller do what they do best - they use their spy abilities to outthink/outwit and outplay their opponents.

What a refreshing change.

Soderbergh directs this whoddunit with professional ease, letting the pace of the scenes set the pace of this film - therefore, the movie moves along at a deliberate pace that makes the 1 hour and 33 minute film feel a little bit longer.

But, that's not (necessarily) a bad thing.

That is because this film has 2x Oscar Nominee Fassbender and 2x Oscar Winner Blanchett as it's 2 leads - and one could watch these 2 play spy games against each other all day. The only down side is that, by plotline necessity, these 2 spend most of their time away from each other, so when they are together, the screen crackles with tension/excitement. It would have been fun to have these 2 confront each other mid-way through the film (a la the DeNiro/Pacino Diner Scene in HEAT), but Soderbergh is a smarter director than that and, wisely, avoids the temptation to do this to keep the rhythm of the mystery story going.

Fassbender and Blanchett are joined by Tom Burke (MANK), Marisa Abela (BARBIE), Rege-Jean Page (BRIDGERTON) and Naomi Harris (MOONLIGHT) as the other suspects/allies and since these 4 need to go toe-to-toe with Fassbender and/or Blanchett, their performances are as good as I've seen from any of them thus far.

Oh, and did I mention Pierce Brosnan (you know, REMINGTON STEELE and a film icon named JAMES BOND) as the boss of all of them. This is an actor who has become more and more interesting the older he gets and this role gives him a chance to chew the scenery and be VERY interesting with the best of them. If the new producers of the next James Bond series doesn't consider making Brosnan the new "M", then they have missed an ideal opportunity.

Screenwriter Koepp has constructed an interesting - and grounded - whoddunit/thriller that gives all of the actors some choice scenes/speeches that are delivered under the careful, trusted vision of Soderbergh which equates to a very satisfying time in the movie theater.

Letter Grade: A- (it does move at a rather languid pace)

8 stars (out of 10) and you can take yhis to the Bank(ofMarquis)