ÉVALUATION IMDb
3,3/10
1,9 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueFive crew members are forced into an escape pod built for four after their starship is destroyed. Just as rescue seems imminent, an alien creature boards their craft and attacks them.Five crew members are forced into an escape pod built for four after their starship is destroyed. Just as rescue seems imminent, an alien creature boards their craft and attacks them.Five crew members are forced into an escape pod built for four after their starship is destroyed. Just as rescue seems imminent, an alien creature boards their craft and attacks them.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Avis en vedette
If I could give it a -10, I'd complain I couldn't give it a -11.
Unbelievable bad script and acting (as in none). Homeworld 1 had better graphics, heck, I'm pretty sure Half Life 1 will hold up to this. It may have the tag "sci-fi", but I'm voting for IMDB to add a "sci-cry" tag, though Half Life 3 may be released sooner then that happening...
Edit; Atleast the keyboard warriors are telling the truth, the movie really sucks.
Unbelievable bad script and acting (as in none). Homeworld 1 had better graphics, heck, I'm pretty sure Half Life 1 will hold up to this. It may have the tag "sci-fi", but I'm voting for IMDB to add a "sci-cry" tag, though Half Life 3 may be released sooner then that happening...
Edit; Atleast the keyboard warriors are telling the truth, the movie really sucks.
The fanboi/shill reviews, or the poor acting.
I am unsure who figured these people, who acted in the past together, could still act ...together and succeed. The show is a modern B. Not that a B movie is bad.
The acting was rigid, forced and, at times, off key. The CGI was bad when ever the color red or orange was needed it seems ;)
If you are a Star Trek cast fan, there will be no deterring you from seeing this. If you are a sucker for IMDB ratings, do not be fooled, this rating is falsly inflated. The movie rating will balance out in the 4.2-5.0 range
I am unsure who figured these people, who acted in the past together, could still act ...together and succeed. The show is a modern B. Not that a B movie is bad.
The acting was rigid, forced and, at times, off key. The CGI was bad when ever the color red or orange was needed it seems ;)
If you are a Star Trek cast fan, there will be no deterring you from seeing this. If you are a sucker for IMDB ratings, do not be fooled, this rating is falsly inflated. The movie rating will balance out in the 4.2-5.0 range
I don't know why there were good reviews/ratings for this movie. A total waste of time. Sorry to be harsh, but it is what it is. Bad sfx, cgi, storyline and poor acting. Do yourself a favor and pass on this one.
I had the opportunity to see this film on the big screen. I think what we have to remember is that the effects are astonishing. The viewer will question if they are watching the set or a green screen shot, its that clean. The story is a culmination and mix of ideas cleverly weaved together with an ending that will not leave you disappointed. Some highlights were seeing Doug Jones not in makeup or costume, and Tim Russ as a bad guy to root for. I think the negative reviewers need to consider the budget and quality you are getting. You don't buy a Honda and expect it to drive like a Ferrari. Just like I wouldn't expect this movie to have the same draw as a Star Wars. Knowing this I really enjoyed it for the entertainment value and underlying relevant hints at current events. Well done.
Too many negative reviews and poor ratings don't make this movie that bad. In fact I quite enjoyed it. The movie moves at an acceptable pace, the story is fine and the acting is okay.
It looks like this is another film that I rate higher than what the majority viewers think. Usually it is the other way around. I consider this movie good enough to make it very watchable and pleasant to view. It fits perfectly in the sci-fi genre.
For a movie made on a shoestring it is an admirable result.
It looks like this is another film that I rate higher than what the majority viewers think. Usually it is the other way around. I consider this movie good enough to make it very watchable and pleasant to view. It fits perfectly in the sci-fi genre.
For a movie made on a shoestring it is an admirable result.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMarina Sirtis, Armin Shimerman, and Tim Russ have each starred in each of the 1990s Star Trek series as Counselor Deanna Troi in Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987), Quark in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (1993) and Lt. Commander Tuvok in Star Trek: Voyager (1995), respectively. Meanwhile, Hana Hatae and Manu Intiraymi played recurring characters Molly O'Brien on TNG and DS9, and Icheb on Voyager, respectively. Later, Doug Jones would also star as Commander Saru in the 2017 prequel series Star Trek: Discovery (2017).
- GaffesWhen the nurse shines the light into Eve's eyes and then walks away, in the next scene from Eve's side, her eyes are closed before opening. Her eyes are then open from the front view and again closed from the side.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is 5th Passenger?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 29m(89 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant