Alien Encounters: Fact or Fiction

This series is a disappointment for anyone with even a basic interest in UFO phenomena. The storytelling is overly simplistic, and the narratives fail to offer anything new or engaging. Investigations are resolved in a childish and predictable manner, leaving no room for suspense or intellectual stimulation. For those who have read or heard about UFO experiences before, this series feels like a watered-down rehash of better material. It might entertain small children or adults entirely new to the subject, but for anyone seeking depth, originality, or a fresh perspective, it falls short. The show ultimately lacks the intrigue and complexity that make UFO stories captivating, reducing fascinating concepts to a bland and uninspired format.

This show has pretty interesting stories, as a newcomer to alien encounter docs. However, the editing of this show is absolutely terrible. Everything is SO SLOW and dragged out.

The same clips are just used over and over again. With up to 3 clients an episode, you're seeing the same clip x3 for intro/during/outro but also per person, so x12 of the same "You have/haven't encountered a UFO".

The resolution is also so unsatisfying. Nothing happens! It's a yes or no and then... okay bye! It seems like there could have been more follow up, especially with the people who were told they hadn't encountered a UFO. Did those individuals go on to keep digging for the answer they wanted? What were the results?

This show had potential but needs a LOT of editing. LAZY TV.

When I saw a new Alien show out, I was a little amped. I can only watch so many of the old shows so many times before I completely burn out.

Is this real or is it meant to be satire? There is literally nothing about this show I enjoyed. From the extensive plastic surgery and war paint Chrissy displays to how Mitch presents his verdict like he is the Alpha and Omega of all that is Alien.

And the first episode? Where in the h#ll did they find that guy? I mean yeah, he's what California has stereotyped itself as over the years, but come on man. Right out of the gate with that idiot?

Let's talk about how they present the findings... dramatic pause... You know when you watch a movie and you can tell the producers are brand new to what they're doing? This is what you get.

Terrible setting. Ridiculous hosts. Second rate production. I didn't make it past the second episode and have removed it from my list. I was elated that discover I wasn't the only one who regretted losing time off my life for this tragedy.

Fire everyone who green-lit this and blacklist those who participated.

Getting Data from NORAD is basically getting data from NASA. Both Mitch and Chrissy should know how censored and classified they are with evidence to " Space Phenomenon. " Especially with Chrissy in the UFO community, I'm surprised she's only going by " hard science " and also not forming her own opinion and being relatable with the experiencers. You don't even need NORAD to look at space traffic time, dates, location. I do it myself online all of the time.

I'm glad these tools are available so people can decipher, but on the flip side of it all, they already have the data before the guests arrive. So before filming and during filming the show, they're all well aware they're debunking almost everyone. How humiliating to those guests. The guests aren't even people that are making an uproar on the world from their own experiences. At this point shame on the producer. -Let's bring people on a show that has an experience only to knowingly dismantle their experience and beliefs.- Put Chrissy and her supposed trusted team to real work and try getting data from the real images and videos that the public sees. If this is coming from an educational stand point, then it needs conducted differently. It's important for everyone to be familiar with what can and cannot be explained, but this method is not it. It's following the typical mainstream Agenda. The show isn't even a real fact or fiction. It's using scientific facts to show the guests their beliefs are fiction. It's Fact AND Fiction.

Also, if phenomenon already cannot be explained ( due to censorship ) then how could you ever prove UFO, Portals, big foot, ET's , etc. As fact?? Let's get away from ridiculous, repetitive, show ideas like this...reach out to me so I can give you a better approach. Especially if you want to keep the show as is. And I get it, everyone is trying to make a profit on this topic because it's the direction people are moving. It's common more people are marketing towards this specific community. So, if you want on board with it, you need to do some soul seeking and mind expansion of your own because it's clear how unrelateable the minds behind this show is, to the public.

The concept to 'harvest' directly from citizen information about the weirdest encounter they met is actuallly quite interesting. And in fact, some of the contributors have actually found pieces of what is most probably come from actual famous and less famous crashed UFO cases.

But the major problem to this series is the editing wich is just awful.

On a 40 minutes length, you got 3 minutes of intro, then they spoke with 3 contributors. So they start talking about the first case bring to there attention, and then, just before you got the conclusion, they come right back 2-3 minutes before and you basically just rewatch what you just saw.

If you strip all of these 'recap', each episode should have been 15 to 20 minutes length.