Dirty Pop: The Boy Band Scam

Or boy too heavy ... well no puns intended. And we won't be doing any shaming here - well in reviewing the show that is. Because there are some "shots" fired - especially from a former N'Sync band member. Now I am not writing his name - because I forgot it, but even more so, because most wouldn't know who it is anyway. Most only know Justin Timberlake (and not just because of his drug problem lately - I think it was DUI, but I don't follow that stuff closely anyway).

Now the documentary show does take its time ... and I understand if some have issues with that. It is a bit long and yet it won't give you backstories on every band member we get to see here ... for that it is too short. Still give it time and it will deliver its points! Watching this halfway through won't really give you the full picture! That said, if you get bored easily it's ok to not "waste your time" ... just don't tell others what to do with their time - especially do not buy into the scheme. Big Poppa - yes he did "good" things ... and yes music would not be the same today without him ... still we should be able to separate the two things and be able to judge him on different levels ... now that will be up to you the viewer of course ... a lot of questions remain unanswered ... still!

I had no idea that any of this happened and the documentary was very interestingm It even explains a few song lyrics that I've had questions about for years. However, the AI of Lou Pearlman is just so very creepy and unnecessary. If it were removed and just a voiceover of those parts was put in it would get a much higher rating from me. I actually hesitate to rate it this high because it really was a super distraction from the actual content I wanted to see. The only other complaint is the reoccurring dramatically colored face lighting shots were not clear in their meaning, so just distracting as well.

I watched this so-called "documentary" until halfway through the third episode, and I'm baffled. If you asked me what it's about, I'd struggle to answer. The basic premise seems to be "Lou Pearlman is bad," but beyond that, there's no real story to follow. Nothing happens, the narrative doesn't progress, and no significant revelations are made. The documentary just circles around, fixating on trivial details that either have nothing to do with the main point or everything to do with it-honestly, it's impossible to tell.

Who is Lou Pearlman? Where did his money come from? How did he connect with so many important people? What are they actually uncovering, and where's the proof? It feels like they had a thin story that could have been told in under 30 minutes but decided to stretch it into a series with no substance. There's simply not enough material for whatever it is they're trying to convey. What a waste of my time-I won't be finishing the series.

I love Netflix docu mini-series. I saw many of them, maybe even most of them. But this one.. it bothered me all the time I was watching. As usual, I did not know anything before I started to watch and after the first episode, I was asking myself, why are they still going in circles and never telling things normally? What happened?? They were dancing about it all the time. It was so annoying. So, they are making documents, because they thought the audience is smart enough to be interesting, but suddenly is not smart enough to tell things honestly and intellectually interestingly. So they chose to take all of the audience's dignity. Since when is quantity better than quality? It is obvious they do not have enough material to make top quality 3 episodes so they took the cheap way. Really disappointed.

I knew nothing about this situation in spite of knowing these bands by name.

It's amazing that such a scam was ever allowed to happen.

Good documentary footage and coverage of the situation overall. Coherent story and explanations.

I could have used a little more variety of the people in the clips, but felt satisfied enough. (You can't get everyone to film, after all.)

My criticism is mainly that they took a good source--the book written by the criminal--and used AI to present it. First, why use AI? Second, why use it here and make the source have an "uncanny valley" vibe?

I'd recommend it as an easy watch.