Face to Face with Scott Peterson

There have been multiple documentaries about this case, and this one doesn't tell us anything new just because Scott speaks. I don't see a man broken because he was falsely convicted, I see someone who thinks that he's served enough time and wants another chance at life.

He offers no explanation of why he drove 90 miles to go fishing on a day that was too cold and wet to play golf.

He demonstrates no discernible distress at the loss of Laci, or that of his child.

He still comes across as disingenuous and self-focused. He doesn't seem concerned with finding the 'real' killer/s, just in convincing the audience that he had nothing to do with the deaths.

He calls Amber a liar, and claims that he made no promises about their relationship and future despite recordings implying a commitment.

The dedication of his sister-in-law beggars belief. She supports his innocence with a conviction that is bordering on unsettling.

I still feel that Scott Peterson is where he belongs and that he should die in jail.

AVOID AT ALL COST!

What a waste of my time, couldn't continue after miserables 43 min.

Dude is a pathological liar that had a girlfriend while married, never showed any emotions , not even after 20 years later.

He absolutely dumped Laci's body with his unborn child into the sea.

I dont know what is going on exactly with these recent documentaries trying to show a different "perspective" about literally and convicted murders.

Save yourself there is nothing new here and I have no idea of why his cuckoo sister in law is trying to help this maniac.

This is a completely disservice to Laci and her family, there is literally a ton of evidence against Scott but people still have the nerve.

You would think after getting a 3.7 star rating on their previous Casey Anthony docuseries that they would stop glorifying killers. Clearly not.

Yet another bias Peacock docuseries that disrespects victims. This doc is basically a retelling of the 2017 A&E doc. Once again it's Scott's sister in law running the show, misleading viewers, and bold faced lies. She and the rest of his family are out of touch with reality. Lookup an online list of every piece of evidence against him and you'll see the massive list of "coincidences", which the family believes is just pure bad luck and poor ol' Scott is innocent.

Skip this watch the new very well made Netflix one, "American Murder: Laci Peterson." This one is based in reality (which is likely why Scott refused to partake in it, instead going along with this unbelievable story, which is a slap in the face for Laci, Conner, and her family. Peacock did the same thing for Casey Anthony, and seems that that their 3.7/10 rating for that one would make them stop, they did it again. Horrible.

This documentary aims to shed light on Scott Petersons potential innocence, instead it magnifies his misconduct and suspiciousness. I think about 80% of the way through the editing process the producers realise their mistake, proceeding to then throw in a ton of heavily circumstantial exculpatory evidence to try rectify their mistake and drive their point, only just missing a well executed alternative perspective, pun intended.

If this was instead a documentary to prove Scott Petersons guilt, this would be more deserving of a higher rating with respect to the attention to detail.

Couldn't help but laugh the whole way through.

Heartbreaking case for the family of Laci and Conner. Life altering event for then naive Amber Frey, who is an imperfect person trying to do the right thing. Scott gives me the ick, doesn't mean he's guilty, although a lot of circumstantial evidence points towards his guilt. While Mr. Peterson is an adulterer, this does not mean he murdered anyone. Logically, it was a case built on circumstantial evidence. This documentary does reflect the possibility of reasonable doubt in Peterson's conviction and trial by media; however, it ends without a conclusion to the DNA testing as requested by the LA innocence project as pending. While the decision to take Mr Peterson off Death Row appears legally valid as the conviction was based on circumstantial evidence, will be curious what the DNA testing will show. I also find it interesting so many of the DNA requests were denied and who isn't curious about the burnt out van, so there is culpability on behalf of the prosecution as well. Mixed feelings on this, agree with overturning the death penalty, but unlike the Netflix documentary that was released days before, there is no input from the friends and family of the victims. Just Scott, still sending out the ick vibes.