Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA remake of the cult classic 1983 sword and sorcery film.A remake of the cult classic 1983 sword and sorcery film.A remake of the cult classic 1983 sword and sorcery film.
- Réalisation
- Scénariste
- Vedettes
5,81.5K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
More Sword, Less Sorcery, and Not Enough Cheese
Steven Kostanski's Deathstalker remake is a curious beast: it's watchable, even occasionally entertaining, but it never quite captures the gloriously cheesy spirit of the 80s originals.
The plot is standard sword-and-sorcery fare... hero collects magical MacGuffins, battles monsters, rescues a princess... but the execution is oddly restrained.
Daniel Bernhardt's Deathstalker is a stoic, muscle-bound hero, but he lacks the swagger or absurdity that made the original films so memorably ridiculous.
The practical effects and creature designs are the film's highlights, offering a tactile, gory charm that's rare in modern fantasy.
The action is competent, but it's missing the wild, anything-goes energy that defined the genre's golden age. Patton Oswalt's comedic moments are a bright spot, but they're too few and far between to elevate the film beyond its middling tone.
Ultimately, Deathstalker feels like a missed opportunity. It's too polished to be a true B-movie, but not ambitious enough to stand out as a genuine fantasy epic. The result is a film that's neither bad nor particularly good - just a forgettable, if occasionally fun, diversion.
5/10: A watchable but disappointingly tame remake that lacks the cheesy thrills of its predecessors.
The plot is standard sword-and-sorcery fare... hero collects magical MacGuffins, battles monsters, rescues a princess... but the execution is oddly restrained.
Daniel Bernhardt's Deathstalker is a stoic, muscle-bound hero, but he lacks the swagger or absurdity that made the original films so memorably ridiculous.
The practical effects and creature designs are the film's highlights, offering a tactile, gory charm that's rare in modern fantasy.
The action is competent, but it's missing the wild, anything-goes energy that defined the genre's golden age. Patton Oswalt's comedic moments are a bright spot, but they're too few and far between to elevate the film beyond its middling tone.
Ultimately, Deathstalker feels like a missed opportunity. It's too polished to be a true B-movie, but not ambitious enough to stand out as a genuine fantasy epic. The result is a film that's neither bad nor particularly good - just a forgettable, if occasionally fun, diversion.
5/10: A watchable but disappointingly tame remake that lacks the cheesy thrills of its predecessors.
Popcorn and friends
Absolutely ridiculous movie. Can't tell if it's a parody or a tribute to the fantasy action movies of the 80s. This doesn't mean its bad, but it's the type of movie that you watch with friends after a few drinks, make popcorn, and just laugh at how insane it is. Surprisingly funny, whether it was trying to be or not. Awesome soundtrack.
Typical Reboot
Like most Reboots, it fails to capture what made the original so Great.
For those who do not know, the OG Deathstalker was a Sword and Sorcery tribute to the "Man with no Name" Clint Eastwood Westerns, Deathstalker even wore his own poncho and had a classic showdown moment. The plot was basic and simple and had plenty of fighting.
This movie, in contrast, featured far superior costumes, and effects. Some of the best practical effects in a while, and it held such promise at the beginning. It started dark and gloomy with a foreboding plot, and introduced you to a world that felt very real and visceral. The over all tone of the movie was dark and it seemed we were very well on our way to a gritty and compelling fantasy story.
Then it is as if the director decided to change tone and after Patton Oswald is introduced, the movies tone changes from dead serious to ridiculous. They played homage to a number of classic Fantasy but it was like they were just thrown together all willy nilly. The amazing costumes and creature effects was replaced by poor stop motion animation (clearly meant as an homage to the Great Ray Harryhausen). The writing was equally silly to match, with such amazing dialogue as "Nya nya you missed me" and half-assed fight scenes. The jokes didn't land though because they just didn't seem to fit the tone of the movie set by the beginning.
Daniel Bernhardt is an amazing stunt man and martial artist but he is a horrible actor to lead a movie and he lacked any sort of presence or charisma of the original. Even if they were trying to be more like Deathstalker II they failed. At least in 2 they knew what they were and just went full camp from the word GO. Not this movie. Its just all over the place with its tone so when something sad or tragic happens it doesn't and at all with any gravitas.
All in all it felt like they had NO idea what they wanted to do with this movie. Was it a serious fantasy, an homage to 80s fantasies, a farce of the genre, or just an over the top comedy? They had no idea what they wanted to be so they tried to be ALL of those things in one movie and it didn't work. I have seen many really bad B movies that I have seen over and over because there was something fun about them that brings me back, but this movie has NOTHING that I want to see again.
For those who do not know, the OG Deathstalker was a Sword and Sorcery tribute to the "Man with no Name" Clint Eastwood Westerns, Deathstalker even wore his own poncho and had a classic showdown moment. The plot was basic and simple and had plenty of fighting.
This movie, in contrast, featured far superior costumes, and effects. Some of the best practical effects in a while, and it held such promise at the beginning. It started dark and gloomy with a foreboding plot, and introduced you to a world that felt very real and visceral. The over all tone of the movie was dark and it seemed we were very well on our way to a gritty and compelling fantasy story.
Then it is as if the director decided to change tone and after Patton Oswald is introduced, the movies tone changes from dead serious to ridiculous. They played homage to a number of classic Fantasy but it was like they were just thrown together all willy nilly. The amazing costumes and creature effects was replaced by poor stop motion animation (clearly meant as an homage to the Great Ray Harryhausen). The writing was equally silly to match, with such amazing dialogue as "Nya nya you missed me" and half-assed fight scenes. The jokes didn't land though because they just didn't seem to fit the tone of the movie set by the beginning.
Daniel Bernhardt is an amazing stunt man and martial artist but he is a horrible actor to lead a movie and he lacked any sort of presence or charisma of the original. Even if they were trying to be more like Deathstalker II they failed. At least in 2 they knew what they were and just went full camp from the word GO. Not this movie. Its just all over the place with its tone so when something sad or tragic happens it doesn't and at all with any gravitas.
All in all it felt like they had NO idea what they wanted to do with this movie. Was it a serious fantasy, an homage to 80s fantasies, a farce of the genre, or just an over the top comedy? They had no idea what they wanted to be so they tried to be ALL of those things in one movie and it didn't work. I have seen many really bad B movies that I have seen over and over because there was something fun about them that brings me back, but this movie has NOTHING that I want to see again.
Fun fantasy B+ movie more entertaining than most "blockbusters"!
This movie may be campy, over the top, silly and small budget. But it is a movie clearly made with love and care by very competent people with a clear goal in mind, and it works!
The practical effects are fantastic for a film of this type, and as far as i can tell it was made without any CGI at all. The rest of the production is great too, and aside from a couple of incels complaining about the lack of nudity the positive reviews are well deserved!
If you like sword & sorcery films or great practical costumes (& campy gore-fests) then this is a film you should watch!
The practical effects are fantastic for a film of this type, and as far as i can tell it was made without any CGI at all. The rest of the production is great too, and aside from a couple of incels complaining about the lack of nudity the positive reviews are well deserved!
If you like sword & sorcery films or great practical costumes (& campy gore-fests) then this is a film you should watch!
Good and light fun
Went to the cinema expecting a simple movie with great looking monsters and scenery. Wasn't disappointed. Surprisingly fun to watch even though I had no familiarity with the genre! The movie does not take itself seriously and I think that is just right. In one scene there are giants in the background hitting each other in the balls while the main characters discuss stuff. Just my kind of humor! The only thing I would have liked more would be more fighting scenes since the main actor is a kickass swordsman and martial artist.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMunkar's Tavern is named after a character in the original Deathstalker (1983)
- ConnexionsRemake of Deathstalker (1983)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
The Year in Posters
The Year in Posters
From Hurry Up Tomorrow to Highest 2 Lowest, take a look back at some of our favorite posters of 2025.
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 42m(102 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant







