Une jeune femme dans une communauté endormie appelée Spearfish commence à recevoir des photographies de jeunes femmes brutalement assassinées. Le coupable est soit un tueur en série, soit un... Tout lireUne jeune femme dans une communauté endormie appelée Spearfish commence à recevoir des photographies de jeunes femmes brutalement assassinées. Le coupable est soit un tueur en série, soit un fluage avec un sens de l'humour malade.Une jeune femme dans une communauté endormie appelée Spearfish commence à recevoir des photographies de jeunes femmes brutalement assassinées. Le coupable est soit un tueur en série, soit un fluage avec un sens de l'humour malade.
- Prix
- 1 nomination au total
Avis en vedette
There are times where this film can't seem to decide whether it wants to be a horror movie or a romantic comedy. There is nothing wrong with taking the time to make your characters charming and likable but do it within the context of the movie. The uneven tone is so noticeable that it becomes incredibly off-putting and takes away any chance the film has to build any atmosphere or tension. In fact I can honestly say in the entire 95 minute runtime I never once felt the slightest emotion towards the movie. I was never worried for a character's safety, or charmed by the dialogue, or even for that matter got a single momentary fright. There is very little good here. Don't be fooled by a nicely made poster and a misleading synopsis. It's terrible.
3/10
...and even that much only because there are some cute girls in it.
Despite being well produced, shot and acted with lots of pretty faces and even some nice T&A, this film just doesn't succeed in being what could have been a more engaging horror flick had some serious editing and script adjustment been applied.
But in the end I'm still a horror junkie and I have to judge the overall package against it's fellow B horror competitors and there is enough here to possibly warrant some degree of entertainment for those with the same genre affliction, there were some OK kills and to be completely honest the picture the killers leave for the girl in the final seconds was brilliantly done, though a photo cannot undo the overall average plot and mundane feel to this film.
This middling contemporary slasher has received most of its buzz from the fact that it was the last project that the late Wes Craven was attached to (he served as executive producer), and had the maestro's name not been on the bill, it's unlikely the film would have seen as much as attention as it has from genre fans. I was excited about the film irrespective of this, as "executive producer' does not equal "writer" or "director," and also because films done in this tradition are rare these days. Opening on VOD and to a small circuit of indie theaters (I caught the film at Cinema Village in New York), the reviews overall have been lukewarm to terrible, so I went into the film with barred expectations–and was actually somewhat surprised by how much I enjoyed it.
While it is in so many ways a conventional slasher thriller, it's also well-shot and decently-acted by any standards. Is it revolutionary? The advent of contemporary horror? Absolutely not. But as a playful riff on serial killer thrillers, it never ceases to be supremely amusing. The production values are high here, and the film benefits greatly from Dean Cundey's cinematography (a frequent collaborator with Spielberg, and the man who shot John Carpenter's "Halloween"). It's flashy and glossy from beginning to end, and conjures the prototypical small-town-in-terror vibe very nicely.
As far as scariness or suspense goes, that is where the film does lack some bite; jump scares surprisingly are not the route taken here, but "masked men lurking in the shadows" is the film's modus operandi. It's ineffective, but what can you do? The muted suspense is possibly the result of the script not seeming to know where it's quite going, but the ambiguous conclusion reifies the apparent confusion in narrative direction, and is quite disturbing in its own right. The performances overall are solid; Kal Penn is appropriately ridiculous as the egomaniacal photographer (whose persona seems to be culled from the likes of Terry Richardson), and Claudia Lee is serviceable as the leading lady despite having an underwritten character. The rest of the supporting cast manages to pull in some comedic elements that offset the sadomasochistic center of the movie, and the dialogue is efficient and believable.
Overall, I thought this was a decent effort, and it is one of the best modern slasher movies I've seen in quite awhile. Fans expecting something revolutionary or on par with the likes of Craven will be disappointed, and I feel that Craven's name on the project may have something to do with the disheartened fans who expected something more than what this film has to offer. In spite of that, "The Girl in the Photographs" is a fun and indulgent throwback to the eighties slasher. It's conventional, but stylish and entertaining enough that I found it worth my time–and maybe that's enough. 6/10.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis is the final film Wes Craven was involved in before he died of brain cancer in August 2015. He was the movie's executive producer.
- Citations
Colleen: Has anyone else seen these or are they just from me?
Sheriff Porter: No body, no crime.
- Générique farfeluBefore the credits, there is a title card that reads, "For Wes", dedicating the film to its deceased executive producer Wes Craven.
- ConnexionsReferences Blow-Up (1966)
Meilleurs choix
- How long is The Girl in the Photographs?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Девушка на фотографиях
- Lieux de tournage
- Victoria, Colombie-Britannique, Canada(on location)
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h 35m(95 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1