sanjsrik
A rejoint août 2010
Badges2
Pour savoir comment gagner des badges, rendez-vous sur page d’aide sur les badges.
Évaluations113
Évaluation de sanjsrik
Commentaires96
Évaluation de sanjsrik
This is a case of a show that had a lot of promise, a lot of talent, a lot of idea, and none of them were fully developed. It felt like it ended right where it should have kept going. What was the point of the 70s style retro technology and even worse the 70s style ending if it didn't answer basic questions as to what was going on? The ham acting, the bad overdramatic melodramatic plot turns and twists, the making the actors emote more than they should have when a simple phrase would have done. This wasn't fargo which had actors that developed a plot. This was a show that was more along the lines of blue velvet that had no clue why they were doing the things they were doing and a plot that struggled with too many plot lines and developed none of them to any useful conclusion.
Nice try. Bad follow-through.
Nice try. Bad follow-through.
I made it through the first 20 minutes and that was 20 minutes too long. It was cartoonish, badly acted, childish in its plot, and plain silly. Nothing in the "movie" told me I was watching anything other than an amateurish student film. Was it meant to be this bad? I just kept asking myself over and over again. Was it meant to be this bad? None of the characters are believable. There's a "super dog"??? Who came up with this script? Nothing in this "movie" was good. There's massive plot holes and nothing makes any sense. And that was within the first 10 minutes. Who actually makes it through this whole entire thing and doesn't come away wondering why did I waste my time?
The "movie" has no good dialog, no good plot, meanders all over the place, actors say lines with smirks knowing how bad they are, and generally, the only thing that might have been good, the locations and sets, are ruined because you have to look around the actors to see the locations. Otherwise, there's so much woodenness in the lines, and the acting, and the plot, and the entire "movie".
Did guy richie have gambling debts he needed to pay off? Is this just the norm now for directors to phone it in with sub-par bad movies?
I'd provide spoilers but what would be the point? If you watch it long enough to care, you've already committed hari kari to get away from remembering how bad this movie was.
Did guy richie have gambling debts he needed to pay off? Is this just the norm now for directors to phone it in with sub-par bad movies?
I'd provide spoilers but what would be the point? If you watch it long enough to care, you've already committed hari kari to get away from remembering how bad this movie was.
Données
Évaluation de sanjsrik