Un vol de diamants réunit les Horsemen illusionnistes à la retraite et les nouveaux venus Greenblatt, Smith et Sessa, alors qu'ils visent de dangereux criminels.Un vol de diamants réunit les Horsemen illusionnistes à la retraite et les nouveaux venus Greenblatt, Smith et Sessa, alors qu'ils visent de dangereux criminels.Un vol de diamants réunit les Horsemen illusionnistes à la retraite et les nouveaux venus Greenblatt, Smith et Sessa, alors qu'ils visent de dangereux criminels.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Stars
Angela Paula Stander
- $50,000 Bucks Audience Member
- (as Angela Stander)
6,316.2K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis à la une
A blatant, uninteresting and lazy rehash of the the second entry in the franchise.
"Now You See Me 3" is by far the worst entry in the franchise.
While the second movie was already inferior to the first, at least it expanded the world and took the story in a new direction. With nine years to develop a sequel, you'd expect something fresh, ambitious, and worthy of the franchise. Instead, the filmmakers went for the laziest option possible: a blatant rehash of the first two films-especially the second-recycling the same story beats, structure, and even the same type of plot twist, just with different characters.
The movie is full of overused tropes executed in the most uninteresting way. The dialogue is poor, character interactions even poorer, and the new characters add nothing except clutter, stealing screen time from the main cast-who end up feeling like guests in their own franchise. Even the visuals feel tired and uninspired, which is especially disappointing given the potential of such a unique premise and the always-wonderful cast. With these characters and this setup, the film could have delivered inventive storytelling and striking set pieces-but it doesn't.
A fourth movie is teased, and if it ever happens, I sincerely hope they hire a writer and director interested in making the sequel this franchise actually deserves.
While the second movie was already inferior to the first, at least it expanded the world and took the story in a new direction. With nine years to develop a sequel, you'd expect something fresh, ambitious, and worthy of the franchise. Instead, the filmmakers went for the laziest option possible: a blatant rehash of the first two films-especially the second-recycling the same story beats, structure, and even the same type of plot twist, just with different characters.
The movie is full of overused tropes executed in the most uninteresting way. The dialogue is poor, character interactions even poorer, and the new characters add nothing except clutter, stealing screen time from the main cast-who end up feeling like guests in their own franchise. Even the visuals feel tired and uninspired, which is especially disappointing given the potential of such a unique premise and the always-wonderful cast. With these characters and this setup, the film could have delivered inventive storytelling and striking set pieces-but it doesn't.
A fourth movie is teased, and if it ever happens, I sincerely hope they hire a writer and director interested in making the sequel this franchise actually deserves.
Too Many Characters, Too Little Depth
Now You See Me: Now You Don't is a fun, flashy, but ultimately forgettable. The first film was a tight, clever heist thriller, as was the second, almost; but this sequel feels overstuffed and rushed.
The new magicians lack depth... their skills and personalities aren't well-established, so it's hard to care. The original Horsemen (all five now) are still charismatic, but their roles feel sidelined in favor of underdeveloped newcomers.
The final heist is visually impressive but lacks the satisfying payoff of the first two films. The twists feel forced, and the revenge-driven plot drags down the fun.
That said, it's not a bad movie - just a missed opportunity. If you loved the first two, you'll find enough spectacle to enjoy, but don't expect the same magic.
6/10: A decent weekend watch, but nothing more.
The new magicians lack depth... their skills and personalities aren't well-established, so it's hard to care. The original Horsemen (all five now) are still charismatic, but their roles feel sidelined in favor of underdeveloped newcomers.
The final heist is visually impressive but lacks the satisfying payoff of the first two films. The twists feel forced, and the revenge-driven plot drags down the fun.
That said, it's not a bad movie - just a missed opportunity. If you loved the first two, you'll find enough spectacle to enjoy, but don't expect the same magic.
6/10: A decent weekend watch, but nothing more.
Now you see me, but never again
How did a big budget, solid actor, much anticipated film yield such poor writing, directing and editing? Magic, apparently.
The trick here is to fool audiences into paying for this nonsense. Want to spend 2 hours of your life watching someone else ooh and aah in in a magic show or play in an escape room filmed on screen?. Only thing worse than the script may be Rosamund Pike's accent. Oy.
The trick here is to fool audiences into paying for this nonsense. Want to spend 2 hours of your life watching someone else ooh and aah in in a magic show or play in an escape room filmed on screen?. Only thing worse than the script may be Rosamund Pike's accent. Oy.
10 Horsemen is 6 too many.
There are just far too many team members now (9 active to the plot and 1 more thrown in at the very end), and still it was missing one notable name from the second movie that would have elevated it more.
This type of heist film is better when we have a small team of 4 doing a mission impossible / hustle / leverage type double movie-length episode.
I know Atlas by name, the other 9 I have no idea what there names were.
Less of the CGI camera tricks. More focus on actual real world tricks and using them to solve crime.
And keep the budget low. We don't need expensive race cars (with an ending that is resolved off screen, when the character just turns up. No explanation given). No home alone optical illusion museum to set things in. It was just stupid.
Seriously too much money was spent on the sets, when a tighter more-focused script was what is needed.
It's watchable and at least they vanished a silk in a TT. They explained how the diamond was switched out. As stupid as that was (same as the car stealing scene). Security around a billion pound diamond was laughable. Even more so when the twist at the end is revealed and you realise how pointless the rest of the movie was.
This type of heist film is better when we have a small team of 4 doing a mission impossible / hustle / leverage type double movie-length episode.
I know Atlas by name, the other 9 I have no idea what there names were.
Less of the CGI camera tricks. More focus on actual real world tricks and using them to solve crime.
And keep the budget low. We don't need expensive race cars (with an ending that is resolved off screen, when the character just turns up. No explanation given). No home alone optical illusion museum to set things in. It was just stupid.
Seriously too much money was spent on the sets, when a tighter more-focused script was what is needed.
It's watchable and at least they vanished a silk in a TT. They explained how the diamond was switched out. As stupid as that was (same as the car stealing scene). Security around a billion pound diamond was laughable. Even more so when the twist at the end is revealed and you realise how pointless the rest of the movie was.
Boring
My least favorite of the three movies. Felt like I was watching an escape room movie. Kind of boring. Love the actors, but just fell flat for me. Luckily I saw the preview for free. Just wasn't as thrilling and entertaining as the other two movies. I'd suggest waiting til it comes out on a streaming platform. . .
The Big List of Fall Movies 2025
The Big List of Fall Movies 2025
See a full list of all the movies coming to theaters this fall.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film was announced by Lions Gate Entertainment CEO Jon Feltheimer in May 2015, more than a year before Insaisissables 2 (2016) was released in June 2016.
- GaffesMerritt McKinney knew what had happened to Thaddeus Bradley after Merrit was brought directly to the police station and the cell, likely without talking to anybody. He would not have known as he didn't see the shooting.
- ConnexionsFollows Insaisissables (2013)
- Bandes originalesCrusades
written by Max Bassin, Dominic DiGesu, Gus Green, Foster Hudson, Cameron Winter
performed by Geese
courtesy of: Partisan Records / PIAS
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Now You See Me: Now You Don't?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Now You See Me: Now You Don't
- Lieux de tournage
- Belgique(Exterior)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 90 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 49 678 000 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 21 013 793 $US
- 16 nov. 2025
- Montant brut mondial
- 186 978 000 $US
- Durée
- 1h 53min(113 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant






