The Brawler

The acting and the script in this film are so incredibly bad that I have to believe it's bad on purpose. Especially Muhammed Ali, his character portrayal is nothing short of a hysterical comic.

Chuck Wepner was a boxer that most boxing fans from the 1960's - 1970's could easily forget about, if it wasn't for the movie Rocky.

The movie starts around the middle part of Wepners boxing career, and takes a few seconds looking at his life before boxing. The movie then goes forward and tells the story of Wepners highs and lows in life.

Chuck Wepner was a heavyweight boxer, who fought his way into the bottom part of the top 10 rated heavyweight fighters in the world. Wepner was seriously never a real threat to any top rated fighter or world champion. He eventually gets a match against Muhammad Ali, by far the biggest event in Wepners boxing career. After his epic fight "The Rumble in the jungle" with George Foreman, Ali picks the 35 year old Wepner for an easy fight in 1975.

After his fight with Ali, Chuck Wepner becomes a bit of a minor celebrity. With the fame Wepner indulges in late night partying, girls, booze and drugs.

Being a movie its obviously dramatized at times, but the story seems to be consistent from what I have read, and the documentary I saw about this subject.

The acting is Ok for what the movie is. The story telling moves a long at a steady pace, and there is usually something happening, for good or bad. One issue is well known characters in the movie like Ali and Stallone look very little like the actual people. I suppose it's not always easy to get really good look a likes. However Zach McGowan who plays Chuck Wepner looks absolutely nothing like Chuck Wepner. The hair and moustache are all wrong. Wepner has a rough boxers face with a pug nose, Zach McGowan looks fresh and has a big nose. The one saving thing is Zach McGowan carries himself like a struggling boxer in the movie. Even though he looks more like a wrestler.

I found this movie watchable as I like boxing and offbeat life stories.

The question is this: Who was dumb enough to give these amateurs the money to make this horrible movie? To call this a cliche boxing movie would be an insult to all of the cliche boxing movies out there. It's hard to identify all of the individual areas where this movie suffers, because everything about it was bad. If you are an aspiring filmmaker, you'll draw inspiration from this. Because if these filmmakers are capable of making a movie that is prominently featured on Netflix, so can you. To give you an idea of how bad this movie is - one of the actors portrays Sylvester Stallone. This particular actor was a very overweight man with pock marked skin and a heavy east coast accent. I don't mean to be insulting, but he looked nothing like Stallone and it was preposterous to watch. I'm genuinely embarrassed for everyone attached to this project. This movie is about Chuck Wepner, "the underdog who went the distance with Muhammad Ali." The only problem with this point is that Ali TKO'd Wepner in the final round of their 1975 fight. Do your homework, fellas.

Excellent. Never a dull moment. All star cast, Great script and different levels of story telling. We now know why Chuck Wepner is the Real Rocky

Asking his opponent to call him the N word. I'm a pugilist fan, but this film really shows the underside of this dark sport.