NOTE IMDb
5,9/10
6,8 k
MA NOTE
Jonathan quitte son bureau tous les jours à midi. Quand il rentre chez lui, il s'endort. Chaque matin, il se réveille et un petit-déjeuner est préparé pour lui, accompagné d'une vidéo lui ra... Tout lireJonathan quitte son bureau tous les jours à midi. Quand il rentre chez lui, il s'endort. Chaque matin, il se réveille et un petit-déjeuner est préparé pour lui, accompagné d'une vidéo lui racontant la deuxième partie de sa journée.Jonathan quitte son bureau tous les jours à midi. Quand il rentre chez lui, il s'endort. Chaque matin, il se réveille et un petit-déjeuner est préparé pour lui, accompagné d'une vidéo lui racontant la deuxième partie de sa journée.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Teo Rapp-Olsson
- Store Clerk
- (as Teo Rapp-Olson)
Alaska L. McFadden
- Sleeping Woman
- (as Alaska McFadden)
Julie Mickelson
- Co-Worker
- (non crédité)
Ramses Torres
- Perez
- (non crédité)
Frankie Verroca
- Dismal Homeless Man
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
Jonathan (Ansel Elgort) is a buttoned up reserved guy. He wakes up at 7am everyday and watches a video of a doppelganger who seems to be a much more relaxed version of himself. He goes to work at an architecture firm and visits Dr. Mina Nariman (Patricia Clarkson) who is treating him for an unknown condition. He always goes to sleep early in the afternoon. One day, he runs into Elena (Suki Waterhouse) on the streets. She claims to know him at night which reveals the shocking truth.
The premise is intriguing and it holds its mystery well for the first act. I was thinking clones or twins. Spoilers, it's not. I actually like the reveal. It's setup for something tense. I want the paranoia. I want the distrust. It gets delivered but not in a satisfying way. So much of this movie is one guy watching the other on video that it drains the intensity out of the flow. I also want real action and tension in the plot. Once the reveal happens, the movie's intensity slowly slides down. I like some of the ideas but this needs more to appeal to a bigger audience.
The premise is intriguing and it holds its mystery well for the first act. I was thinking clones or twins. Spoilers, it's not. I actually like the reveal. It's setup for something tense. I want the paranoia. I want the distrust. It gets delivered but not in a satisfying way. So much of this movie is one guy watching the other on video that it drains the intensity out of the flow. I also want real action and tension in the plot. Once the reveal happens, the movie's intensity slowly slides down. I like some of the ideas but this needs more to appeal to a bigger audience.
It's not that often that I don't really know what to think about a movie.
The technical part is really enjoyable.
The synopsis strange and mysterious. We enter little by little, day to day, in the reality of Jonathan and we understand very slowly what this reality means.
It's dark. But not really sad.
It's complex. The movie doesn't try to simplify or over explain it, which is great. But also left me with too much questioning to be at ease. I don't know if the ending is great and really smart, or a bit dull.
I don't know. And it's fine.
And perhaps this movie is great because of this: it leaves you with more questions than answers.
And perhaps this movie is great because of this: it leaves you with more questions than answers.
I expected just a little more. Be it character development or just a more to the ending...... i just feel like it was missing something.
4.6
4.6
I have always been intrigued by Disassociative Identity Disorder. I've read a couple autobiographies and found most of how this movie portrayed the disorder to be true to what I know of it. But I loved the twist, pulling in a little bit of future technology (sci-fi) Into the story. I thought this was well written and definitely well acted. I look forward to what else the writer/director does in the future! As a movie it's definitely not action packed and might be considered slow buy some. It kept my attention because you thought you knew the direction it was going to go but it definitely took a couple unexpected turns. I was moved by the ending and felt it fit the story perfectly as well as feeling realistic.
This beautiful little film might best be described as an interesting new take on the Narcissus myth, with an impressive central performance by Ansel Elgort. Both stylish and moving, this small scale story raises questions about the nature of desire, compassion, self-reflexivity and unconventional love.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesJohn and Jonathan's The Rules for Living 1. We tell each other EVERYTHING. 2. We do not lie to each other. 3. We are each other's best friend. 4. We take care of our body. 5. No girlfriends.
- GaffesJonathan ties himself to the bed with three-digit combo locks that are easily opened within an hour each, but John seemingly didn't even try.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Duplicate
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 2 100 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 41 558 $US
- Durée1 heure 40 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant