Tiffany cherche à comprendre comment la mystérieuse femme en blanc a tue sa soeur. Quand elle croise Adélaïde, une femme dont la famille semble être cible de la même entité, elle essaie d'em... Tout lireTiffany cherche à comprendre comment la mystérieuse femme en blanc a tue sa soeur. Quand elle croise Adélaïde, une femme dont la famille semble être cible de la même entité, elle essaie d'empêcher l'histoire de se répéter.Tiffany cherche à comprendre comment la mystérieuse femme en blanc a tue sa soeur. Quand elle croise Adélaïde, une femme dont la famille semble être cible de la même entité, elle essaie d'empêcher l'histoire de se répéter.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Kelly O'Connor
- Brittany
- (voix)
Avis à la une
I'll refer to both GIRL IN THE CORNFIELD (GITC) and GIRL IN THE CORNFIELD 2 (GITC2) in this review.
If you're going in blind, know that these are not fast-paced action-horror movies, horror comedies, or campy b-movies. They're slow paced, creepy, suspenseful thrillers. The closest thing I can compare these movies to is reading an urban legend crossed with an epic horror novel like Tommyknockers.
GITC and GITC2 both feature great scripts by Ryan Callaway, wonderful plotting and characterization. I loved the way these movies to the time to explore how the characters process their experiences.
Some of the performances were so-so, and sometimes that hurt the scene--this was mainly a problem in GITC; the performances in GITC2 were stronger. If I had to pick, I would say GITC2 is the superior movie.
Speaking of performances: Madeline Lupi was impressive in GITC and more so in GITC2. Specific to GITC2, Michelle Lulic was outstanding and the child actors were surprisingly good.
I felt that removing some of the scoring could have helped, particularly in the first movie. Perhaps I simply got used to it, but I didn't find that to be a problem in 2.
Given the microbudget, special effects were handled very well. Use of CGI was limited, thankfully.
I watched both of these movies back to back and my appreciation of Ryan Callaway's work grew the longer I watched. Contrary to the featured review, neither of these movies is a "zero budget waste of time."
If you're going in blind, know that these are not fast-paced action-horror movies, horror comedies, or campy b-movies. They're slow paced, creepy, suspenseful thrillers. The closest thing I can compare these movies to is reading an urban legend crossed with an epic horror novel like Tommyknockers.
GITC and GITC2 both feature great scripts by Ryan Callaway, wonderful plotting and characterization. I loved the way these movies to the time to explore how the characters process their experiences.
Some of the performances were so-so, and sometimes that hurt the scene--this was mainly a problem in GITC; the performances in GITC2 were stronger. If I had to pick, I would say GITC2 is the superior movie.
Speaking of performances: Madeline Lupi was impressive in GITC and more so in GITC2. Specific to GITC2, Michelle Lulic was outstanding and the child actors were surprisingly good.
I felt that removing some of the scoring could have helped, particularly in the first movie. Perhaps I simply got used to it, but I didn't find that to be a problem in 2.
Given the microbudget, special effects were handled very well. Use of CGI was limited, thankfully.
I watched both of these movies back to back and my appreciation of Ryan Callaway's work grew the longer I watched. Contrary to the featured review, neither of these movies is a "zero budget waste of time."
"The Girl in the Cornfield" was a short, fun, spooky campfire tale. Very amateur, but ambitious. The sequel branched out to try to be something more and in my opinion, accomplished it.
Tiffany, the brave young girl from the first movie, is back trying to find a way to stop the Woman in White. Meanwhile the entity is haunting a new family, apparently accompanied by multiple demons (or at least multiple manifestations). When Tiffany meets the eldest daughter Addy, she tries to save the family from the Woman in White's evil intentions.
The story is riveting. For a movie that is over two hours it's well paced and managed to keep me interested in every development. You don't know what the hell is going on for most of the film and the eventual payoff is satisfying. The acting was also solid. The actress playing Tiffany especially shines but really they all played their parts well. No one stunk it up or was cheesy. And as for scares, there is a lot of suspense, and a handful of jump scares that got me really good.
If you like microbudget movies and are used to watching them on Netflix and Amazon Prime - this is a good one. If you like your movies made for $100,000 or more, you should probably watch something else.
Tiffany, the brave young girl from the first movie, is back trying to find a way to stop the Woman in White. Meanwhile the entity is haunting a new family, apparently accompanied by multiple demons (or at least multiple manifestations). When Tiffany meets the eldest daughter Addy, she tries to save the family from the Woman in White's evil intentions.
The story is riveting. For a movie that is over two hours it's well paced and managed to keep me interested in every development. You don't know what the hell is going on for most of the film and the eventual payoff is satisfying. The acting was also solid. The actress playing Tiffany especially shines but really they all played their parts well. No one stunk it up or was cheesy. And as for scares, there is a lot of suspense, and a handful of jump scares that got me really good.
If you like microbudget movies and are used to watching them on Netflix and Amazon Prime - this is a good one. If you like your movies made for $100,000 or more, you should probably watch something else.
This sequel is fully twice as long as part 1, and it plays like someone couldnt quite pull the budget for a trilogy. i can see two stories that are ruined by mashing them together. the camerawork and sound fx are cringeworthy. the direction and performances are better, without doubt, but the obvious editing disaster makes this a 2+ hour slip n slide of unfinished business. its got the modern classic horror open ending, hey, part three might be 4 hours long! not particularly recommended. this kinda thing is an acquired taste, even when its properly finished
I'm surprised to see this movie given quality reviews on here given that I could find virtually no worth in it whatsoever. It's a real time waster of a film, a follow up to the original that nobody asked for. The protagonist is the sister of one of the victims in the original film, teaming up with a cursed family in order to prevent tragedy striking again.
This film strives desperately for a RING-style vibe but completely fails to impress in every respect. There are many attempts at atmosphere building and virtually none of them work; it just falls flat time and again. The sinister music is the only decent thing about it. Otherwise, it's just a bunch of amateur cast members sharing inane dialogue to no good effect.
This film strives desperately for a RING-style vibe but completely fails to impress in every respect. There are many attempts at atmosphere building and virtually none of them work; it just falls flat time and again. The sinister music is the only decent thing about it. Otherwise, it's just a bunch of amateur cast members sharing inane dialogue to no good effect.
Okay so yes it's a low budget, pure amateur attempt at a supernatural thriller and I'm evaluating it with that in mind. But after one dream sequence after another, after another, after another, after another all in just the first half, you give up on maintaining any suspense in any scene to follow. The old saying fool me once, shame on you,,Fool me twice, shame on ME, comes into play VERY early...
It also runs way too long and has only about 30 seconds of real suspenseful action for a two hour film... The females in the film though all did a good job with their parts, the one male lead's character however was just not very believable and just too stiff and dull to watch.
Hopefully the writer and director will get better in any attempt to create such a movie in the future..
It also runs way too long and has only about 30 seconds of real suspenseful action for a two hour film... The females in the film though all did a good job with their parts, the one male lead's character however was just not very believable and just too stiff and dull to watch.
Hopefully the writer and director will get better in any attempt to create such a movie in the future..
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesOriginally, Shady Dawn Pictures had another film on the slate for summer 2016 and Ryan had no plans for a sequel to "The Girl in the Cornfield". A viewer who screened a Rough Cut made an off-hand remark about a potential sequel and that later inspired Callaway to start writing in February after getting the go-ahead from Producer Sabine Becker. Casting was initially finalized on May 13th, the day the original movie was released. Shooting began in late June.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Film Discussions: We Go on and Where Demons Dwell Film Discussion (2017)
- Bandes originalesSanta Barbara
Performed by Holy Visions
Provided by Coup De Grace Studios
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Where Demons Dwell
- Lieux de tournage
- New Jersey, États-Unis(Everything)
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 2h 17min(137 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant