Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAfter an Englishwoman dies, leaving behind two children, her devoted friend decides to take the children to find the woman's husband, an American serviceman who had returned to the USA. But ... Tout lireAfter an Englishwoman dies, leaving behind two children, her devoted friend decides to take the children to find the woman's husband, an American serviceman who had returned to the USA. But the father, now a successful architect, claims not to remember ever having gotten married ... Tout lireAfter an Englishwoman dies, leaving behind two children, her devoted friend decides to take the children to find the woman's husband, an American serviceman who had returned to the USA. But the father, now a successful architect, claims not to remember ever having gotten married or having any children.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Bellhop
- (non crédité)
- Night Clerk
- (non crédité)
- Red Cross Worker
- (non crédité)
- Girl at Stag Party
- (non crédité)
- Frank
- (non crédité)
- Bartender
- (non crédité)
- Judge Henderson
- (non crédité)
- Police Sergeant
- (non crédité)
- Nurse
- (non crédité)
- Motorcycle Cop
- (non crédité)
- Joyce Gray
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
When the film begins, you learn that a British lady has died and her twin children are being kept by her landlady. However, there IS a father--some American named John Gray. So, an amazingly stupid lady (Ann Richards) decides she's going to go to the States to find the man--a guy who married the now dead lady while was stationed in Britain during the war. However, instead of going about this is a sane manner, she decides to tell the Red Cross that she IS the dead woman and gets them to pay for her voyage with the two children. Once she's in America, she seems to automatically know that THE John Gray she wants is the one played by Tone--even though it's a relatively common name and he might not be the one. So, despite having no hard evidence, she strikes like a blitzkrieg--not caring what sort of repercussions there might be.
Now if this isn't bad enough (and amazingly contrived), it turns out that this Gray might just be the one. However (uggh, this is bad writing), he doesn't know if he is or isn't because he had a head injury and six weeks of his life are missing. During that time he MIGHT have gotten married and fathered the kids--but he doesn't know! Later (in yet another badly written twist), he learns that the woman pretending to be his wife is a liar...and he now is in love with her and must have her!!!
The bottom line is that none of this film makes sense. It's built on one dopey premise after another and the movie is one of the most contrived and silly films I've ever seen. The end result is impossible to believe, quite stupid and really a waste of decent actors. Not worth your bothering with this one.
There are some good lines in this movie written by Joseph Fields. Clarence Kolb seems to have more than his fair share of them, but perhaps Kolb, trouper that he is, is simply better at speaking them. Tone adopts an expression of satisfied stupidity that reminds me of Stan Laurel as time goes on, and Miss Richards speaks her lines as simply as possible, probably in an effort not to be held responsible. This is an Eagle-Lion production, produced by Arthur Krim and his crew as they worked at taking what had been PRC, and making it respectable. It seems to have been very early in the process.
Anyway, no biggie! It set me on the right ramp to launch LOST HONEYMOON, which opens with the news of the passing of a mother of twins in England, with the husband living in the USA. A close friend (Richards) of the deceased decides that the father must live up to his responsibilities in regard to the children and she impersonates the deceased by using her passport (back in 1947 that was far more possible than today, and even today it is still done to forge your identity, so no dent on reality there!)
At a frenzied pace the spectator learns that good old Franchot is about to marry beautiful Rafferty, completely amnesic about the fact that he had already tied the knot in England some years earlier. That sets in motion a series of funny developments with Franchot in good form, ably assisted by good friend Conway who himself is interested in Richards, who seems deeply moved by Franchot who is betrothed to Rafferty, with her rich dad in tow...
I watched a poor copy that did not permit rating cinematographic quality, but the script by Joseph Fields deserves plaudits for sharp zingers, twists and turns.
I loved it right to the clever ending. 8/10.
This is an average comedy in the end but it's played well by the actors and isn't a waste of time at all.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis film's earliest documented telecast took place in Honolulu Wednesday 25 February 1953 on KONA (Channel 11); it first aired in New York City Wednesday 5 May 1954 on WCBS (Channel 2), in Tijuana, Mexico Thursday 20 May 1954 on XETV (Channel 6), and in Baltimore Saturday 3 July 1954 on WMAR (Channel 2).
- Citations
Dr. Davis: You have a complete amnesia?
The Amnesiac: Complete... those six weeks are a total blank... Bob, is it possible that I was out of my mind when I got married?
Dr. Davis: That's the time most people do it.
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Lost Honeymoon
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 11 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.37 : 1