Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsHoliday Watch GuideGotham AwardsSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Glen or Glenda

  • 1953
  • Tous publics
  • 1h 5min
NOTE IMDb
4,3/10
9,6 k
MA NOTE
Edward D. Wood Jr., Timothy Farrell, and Dolores Fuller in Glen or Glenda (1953)
A psychiatrist tells the stories of a transvestite (Glen or Glenda) and a pseudohermaphrodite (Alan or Anne).
Lire trailer2:56
1 Video
75 photos
DrameHorreur

Un psychiatre raconte les histoires d'un travesti (Glen ou Glenda) et d'un pseudohermaphrodite (Alan ou Anne).Un psychiatre raconte les histoires d'un travesti (Glen ou Glenda) et d'un pseudohermaphrodite (Alan ou Anne).Un psychiatre raconte les histoires d'un travesti (Glen ou Glenda) et d'un pseudohermaphrodite (Alan ou Anne).

  • Réalisation
    • Edward D. Wood Jr.
  • Scénariste
    • Edward D. Wood Jr.
  • Stars
    • Edward D. Wood Jr.
    • Bela Lugosi
    • Lyle Talbot
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    4,3/10
    9,6 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Edward D. Wood Jr.
    • Scénariste
      • Edward D. Wood Jr.
    • Stars
      • Edward D. Wood Jr.
      • Bela Lugosi
      • Lyle Talbot
    • 150avis d'utilisateurs
    • 46avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Vidéos1

    Trailer
    Trailer 2:56
    Trailer

    Photos74

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 68
    Voir l'affiche

    Casting principal20

    Modifier
    Edward D. Wood Jr.
    Edward D. Wood Jr.
    • Glen
    • (as Daniel Davis)
    • …
    Bela Lugosi
    Bela Lugosi
    • Scientist
    Lyle Talbot
    Lyle Talbot
    • Inspector
    Timothy Farrell
    • Psychiatrist
    Dolores Fuller
    Dolores Fuller
    • Barbara
    'Tommy' Haynes
    • Alan…
    Charlie Crafts
    • Johnny
    • (as Charles Crafts)
    Conrad Brooks
    Conrad Brooks
    • Banker
    • (as Connie Brooks)
    • …
    Henry Bederski
    • Man with Hat and Receding Hairline
    • (non crédité)
    Carol Daugherty
    • Woman in Nightmare
    • (non crédité)
    Captain DeZita
    • The Devil
    • (non crédité)
    • …
    Helen Miles
      Bruce Spencer
      • Homosexual
      • (non crédité)
      Shirley Speril
      • Miss Stevens
      • (non crédité)
      Amzie Strickland
      Amzie Strickland
      • Minor Role
      • (non crédité)
      Harry Thomas
      • Man in Nightmare
      • (non crédité)
      William C. Thompson
      • Judge
      • (non crédité)
      Mr. Walter
      • Patrick
      • (non crédité)
      • …
      • Réalisation
        • Edward D. Wood Jr.
      • Scénariste
        • Edward D. Wood Jr.
      • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
      • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

      Avis des utilisateurs150

      4,39.5K
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10

      Avis à la une

      thislizard

      Stunningly abstract half-amateur film-making gives unbelievably modern and humane insight into gender issues.

      As probably many other viewers I decided to see "Glen or Glenda" to verify if it's really what was hinted in the brilliant biographical "Ed Wood". And indeed, I stared with my mouth open at Bela Lugosi's recitations and the random buffalo scene. It was all there. Some honestly unintended avant-garde.

      Yet the movie is not half as bad as the legend holds it. The important fact is that it isn't an actual story, it's more of a semi-documentary, party educational picture. Behind the really weird editing the movie tells a lot about transvestitism, transsexualism, relationships, sexual identity and social roles. It's hard to believe that it was made in early 1950s! Not only it was produced significantly before the so called "sexual revolution" of the '60s, but also certain gender issues that were carefully covered in the movie seem to be still beyond the understanding of certain narrow-minded and prejudiced people today.

      I recommend this movie to anyone who wants to get to know Edward Wood and his work and also to people interested in the history of approach to gender studies and the society.
      6minastrate

      Surprisingly watchable and even touching.

      Now don't get me wrong; this film is truly loaded with all sorts of hilarious moments owing to Wood's bizarre and inept filmmaking. Moments including; baffling dialogue, poor acting, disjointed editing, hella stock footage, confusing sequences, and times where I'm really not sure what's happening at all.

      But, after watching "Plan 9" first and being kinda bored at some points, I was surprised to find this was not the case at all with "Glen Or Glenda". I was engaged throughout the entire film and also found it to be a much funnier experience than I my first time watching "Plan 9".

      Also, at more than one point through the runtime, I genuinely felt empathy for Wood himself and his plight regarding his own transvestism as depicted in the film. It was genuinely touching and I honestly look forward to seeing this film again.

      I dare say this could potentially become a kind of favourite of mine in a way. But for reasons unlike any for any other film I would consider a favourite. It's safe to say I would actually recommend this film, whereas I wouldn't as readily recommend "Plan 9".
      jwstrand63

      Way ahead of it's time, and was also used as a teaching tool!

      I am a huge fan of Ed, after seeing "Ed Wood", and I have since bought the book "Nightmare of Ecstacy". Also, I bought all of the films that he had made that I could get my hands on.

      Like it or not, "Glen Or Glenda" was a landmark film!

      This particular film was made WAY AHEAD of it's time!! While I was first watching Tim Burton's fantastic film, recreating the making of "Glen Or Glenda", I noticed that there were things in it that seemed rather familiar to me, even after 30+ years have passed, and that is what partly interested me in looking into both the book, and Ed Wood's films. What I discovered was, I had seen this film when I was in GRADE SCHOOL!!

      After viewing the REAL "Glen OR Glenda" film, I realized that I had had seen this exact same film before, although heavily edited!

      It was shown as a part of our sex-ed class!! I can hardly believe it that they showed us this back then, but they did. No

      thanks to the school I went to, and the horribly incompetent teachers, but they did show it!

      Now, fast forward to today, the reason for all of the extra scenes near the end of the film, such as the 'Devil' sequences, and the rest of the rather abstract looking scenes, were not originally part of the screenplay. Those scenes (baffling and dumbfounding), were NOT part of the film as Ed had written. His script left the running time short of what George Weiss had told him he wanted, a 7 reel, 16MM film, which was what he needed to sell it. A 16MM reel runs about 10 minutes, and George needed a 70 minute film (at least), because he pre-sold it in several states as a "Feature", before he actually found out what it really was. He wasn't too pleased with what Ed had made, but he was able to distribute it to his clients, after all of the extraneous material was added at the end. George did eventually make his money back, and he and Ed worked on a couple of other projects, unlike what is shown in the "Ed Wood" film.

      Even today, though, I think that this film was made way before it's time, and Ed Wood should deserve some credit for trying to bring a sense of understanding to what was then a totally misunderstood way of life for a select few.
      Infofreak

      Believe the hype! Everything you've heard about this one is true! Fifty years on it's STILL one of the weirdest movies ever made.

      Ever since Tim Burton's wonderful 'Ed Wood' raised Ed Wood Jr's profile and made his seriously bent movies movies better known than they have ever been, some cult movie fans have gotten their noses out of joint. Wood's reputation as the worst director ever pushes some buffs buttons as it marginalizes already marginalized film makers like Ray Dennis Steckler, Ted V. Mikels, Herschell Gordon Lewis, Al Adamson and other "so bad it's good" directors. I leave more knowledgeable fans than me to argue over who REALLY is the worst, but there's no denying that Wood's movies are quite unlike anything made before or since. 'Glen Or Glenda' is his best movie, or if the term "best" misleads, his Ed Woodest. I've lost track of how many times I've seen it over the years but it never loses its power to amuse and astound. Every single time I watch it I am flabbergasted! It literally has to be seen to be believed. Wood plays the title character, a man wrestling with his transvestitism. His girlfriend is played by Dolores Fuller, the cop by Lyle Talbot, the psychiatrist by Timothy Farrell, all three familiar faces from other Wood classics like 'Plan Nine From Outer Space' and 'Jail Bait'. But the real reason to watch this is the utterly bizarre performance from horror legend Bela Lugosi, credited on the version I watched as "scientist", and on the IMDb as "The Spirit", who may or may not be God. His rantings of "Pull the strings! Pull the strings!" and nonsensical stuff about "Green dragons" and "puppy dog tails" will stay in your head for YEARS, if not for the rest of your life! Wood intercuts this with nutty stock footage like buffalo stampedes, and one of the most wacked out nightmare sequences ever seen, which includes lots of chubby gals in states of undress, some S and M, and and an appearance by Satan. Believe the hype - everything you've heard about this one is true! Fifty years on it's STILL one of the weirdest movies ever made. If you haven't seen 'Glen Or Glenda' you just don't know what you're missing!
      4gizmomogwai

      One of the most bewildering movies I've seen

      I had a particularly masochistic day today, watching both Manos: The Hands of Fate and Glen or Glenda, both of which have at some point been claimed to be the Worst Movie Ever. Watching both movies in one day made Glen or Glenda look good by comparison, but it is, by itself, one of the most bewildering movies I've seen.

      I say this not because of its pleas for tolerance in gender matters. That might have seemed odder in the '50s, when homophobia was more mainstream. We've since moved on to debating whether gays can marry. What's really striking about this movie, rather, is the extended surreal dream sequences and the inexplicable narration of Bela Lugosi. Throw Satan in there! Why not? A herd of buffalo stampeding below Lugosi? Why not? Being trampled by the herd would symbolize being run over by society for an urge to cross-dress, wouldn't it? Symbolism! Except the symbolism goes on way too long, one sensing in an effort by Ed Wood to drag his movie over the 60-minute mark. Eventually, it becomes incomprehensible.

      And what of that narration? Bela Lugosi, "the Scientist," is kind of like a half-scientist, half-god character, who's also dark. He has skeletons around him for some reason. He says sinister things. Who or what is he? At the same time, a doctor is telling a police officer about Glen and Glenda. I'm reminded of the Nostalgia Critic's criticism of Rock-A-Doodle- who in god's name is telling the story? "The Scientist" or the doctor?

      You can find some elements of this style in a movie like Ingmar Bergman's Persona- random flashing of unpleasant things, apparent dream sequences, a kind of god-like "narration" (a boy watching a TV), but that movie was competently done. Glen or Glenda becomes a giant non sequitur- not the worst movie ever, but worth quite the WTF?

      Vous aimerez aussi

      La Fiancée du monstre
      4,2
      La Fiancée du monstre
      Plan 9 from Outer Space
      3,9
      Plan 9 from Outer Space
      La nuit des revenants
      3,6
      La nuit des revenants
      Jail Bait
      3,7
      Jail Bait
      Ed Wood
      7,8
      Ed Wood
      Si la mort te trouve avant
      Si la mort te trouve avant
      The Sun Was Setting
      5,3
      The Sun Was Setting
      The Sinister Urge
      2,7
      The Sinister Urge
      Cleopatra Follies
      Cleopatra Follies
      Criswell Predicts
      6,0
      Criswell Predicts
      Le Masque d'or
      6,2
      Le Masque d'or
      Take It Out in Trade
      3,7
      Take It Out in Trade

      Centres d’intérêt connexes

      Naomie Harris, Mahershala Ali, Janelle Monáe, André Holland, Herman Caheej McGloun, Edson Jean, Alex R. Hibbert, and Tanisha Cidel in Moonlight (2016)
      Drame
      Mia Farrow in Rosemary's Baby (1968)
      Horreur

      Histoire

      Modifier

      Le saviez-vous

      Modifier
      • Anecdotes
        Surrealist filmmaker David Lynch called this one of his favorite films. He used the "howling wind" sound effect in Eraserhead (1977).
      • Gaffes
        The text accompanying the close-up of a newspaper story headlined "Man Nabbed Dressed As Girl" is a hodge-podge of unrelated paragraphs lifted from stories about tax reform, a prison injury, and faith healing.
      • Citations

        Narrator: Give this man satin undies, a dress, a sweater and a skirt, or even the lounging outfit he has on, and he's the happiest individual in the world. He can work better, think better, he can play better, and he can be more of a credit to his community and his government because he is happy.

      • Crédits fous
        Card at beginning: In the making of this film, which deals with a strange and curious subject, no punches have been pulled-- no easy way out has been taken. Many of the smaller parts are portrayed by persons who actually are, in real life, the character they portray on the screen. This is a picture of stark realism-- taking no sides -- but giving you the facts -- ALL the facts -- as they are today... YOU ARE SOCIETY -- JUDGE YE NOT...
      • Versions alternatives
        At least one VHS release (Bizarre Video's) ends the film with a fade out at the end of Anne's story, thus amputating the final few minutes of the film, so we never learn how Glen's story was resolved.
      • Connexions
        Edited into Sleazemania Strikes Back (1985)
      • Bandes originales
        Czardas
        (uncredited)

        Music by Vittorio Monti

        [plays during the bondage portion of the dream sequence]

      Meilleurs choix

      Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
      Se connecter

      FAQ76

      • How long is Glen or Glenda?Alimenté par Alexa
      • What is 'Glen or Glenda' about?
      • Why is this movie famous?
      • What does the introductory title card say?

      Détails

      Modifier
      • Date de sortie
        • 30 août 1995 (France)
      • Pays d’origine
        • États-Unis
      • Langue
        • Anglais
      • Aussi connu sous le nom de
        • Louis ou Louise
      • Lieux de tournage
        • Hollywood, Los Angeles, Californie, États-Unis
      • Société de production
        • Screen Classics (II)
      • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

      Box-office

      Modifier
      • Budget
        • 20 000 $US (estimé)
      • Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
        • 10 158 $US
      • Montant brut mondial
        • 10 158 $US
      Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

      Spécifications techniques

      Modifier
      • Durée
        • 1h 5min(65 min)
      • Couleur
        • Black and White
      • Mixage
        • Mono
      • Rapport de forme
        • 1.37 : 1

      Contribuer à cette page

      Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
      • En savoir plus sur la contribution
      Modifier la page

      Découvrir

      Récemment consultés

      Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
      Obtenir l'application IMDb
      Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
      Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
      Obtenir l'application IMDb
      Pour Android et iOS
      Obtenir l'application IMDb
      • Aide
      • Index du site
      • IMDbPro
      • Box Office Mojo
      • Licence de données IMDb
      • Salle de presse
      • Annonces
      • Emplois
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Politique de confidentialité
      • Your Ads Privacy Choices
      IMDb, une société Amazon

      © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.