Quitte ou double

Yes, "The Ducksters" is almost too violent to even register as a cartoon, but the twisted stuff in these cartoons is what made them so great. It features Daffy Duck hosting a sadistic game show with Porky Pig as the contestant getting maimed in various and sundry ways for answering questions wrong (as can be expected, one of these involves dynamite). But after a while, Porky really gets fed up...I mean REALLY fed up.

So, I thought that this was a pretty funny cartoon, but I will say that it's probably not one for little children (but hey, these cartoons weren't really targeted at little children). Worth seeing.

Since I first saw it at a very young age, I've always found Chuck Jones's 'The Ducksters' to be one of the funniest cartoons I've ever seen. This is largely due to Michael Maltese's hilarious script but, as always, Jones displays extraordinary timing in bringing it to the screen. A spoof of radio quiz shows, 'The Ducksters' is a deliciously sadistic film in which Daffy Duck's host terrorizes Porky Pig's contestant with impossible questions and horrendously violent penalties. The timing of both the verbal and physical antics is impeccable, leading up to a thoroughly satisfying finale with the iris closing on a fantastic climactic Daffy line. Rarely discussed or praised, 'The Ducksters' is a childhood favourite of mine and a cartoon very dear to my heart. It's both rib-ticklingly witty and delightfully violent, which just about amounts to the perfect combination for this cartoon fanatic!

Daffy Duck hosts an annoying radio game show and Porky Pig is the unsuspecting contestant. Daffy spends most of the time pranking on Porky who is patiently trying to answer the questions.

I love the pairing of Daffy Duck and Porky Pig. I am a little uncomfortable with the situation in this one. I don't like it that an annoying Daffy keeps bullying Porky Pig. That's what this is ultimately. Daffy is bullying Porky for most of this short and I don't like it. Daffy does eventually gets his comeuppance, but I am still feeling the bullying. Maybe if Porky could fight back earlier. I still like this.

It was Chuck Jones who coined the phrase "illustrated radio" to describe the excessively talky style of limited animation introduced to television by Bill Hanna and Joe Barbera in the 1960s (ironically, the two directors responsible for the inspired Tom and Jerry cartoons of the 1940s and '50s, which were almost entirely devoid of dialogue). With a good cartoon, Jones argued, it ought to be possible to watch it with the sound turned off and still "get" most of it. Watch The Flintstones or Yogi Bear with the sound off, and for the most part you'll see people standing around motionless, with fixed, stock expressions on their faces, talking to one another.

There's no denying that Hanna-Barbera television cartoons are bad. But if they're "illustrated radio", is that WHY they're bad? Certainly not in itself - because this short cartoon, directed by (who else?) Chuck Jones, is illustrated radio if anything is. Watch it without the sound and you'll miss the jokes (even the visual ones) and have difficulty making sense of it. Listen to it without the images and you'll follow what's going on easily - and it will still be funny. Moreover, what we see and here is the broadcast of a radio station quiz show, with Daffy Duck asking outrageously unfair questions of Porky Pig. If this is not "illustrated radio", what is? And yet it's one of the best cartoons ever made.

Perhaps it's misleading to point out that the cartoon makes sense without the images. To some degree the sounds imply the images. If you hear Daffy saying, "I'm sthorry, your ansthwer isth incorrect" followed by a heavy thud, part of the humour is visual: you SEE what happens, even if you have your eyes shut. The animators realise what we ought to see perfectly and (of course) outdo what we would have visualised for ourselves. The facial expressions in particular are inspired. But the carefully chosen WORDS are as crucial to the cartoon's success as any other element. The humour of Porky's desperate yet polite pleas to end the torture is almost entirely verbal - and nothing in the cartoon is funnier. Jones, despite his official stance, could easily integrate ANY kind of humour into a seamless whole, because his cartoons are always rooted in a firm understanding of character and motivation. Jones's creations NEVER step out of character. Daffy (street-wise but world-foolish, as the saying goes) shamelessly writes the rules himself; Porky (Daffy's precise opposite) gamely abides by them. Porky wins, but Jones doesn't cheat to bring this about.

This ranks as one of the funniest Looney Tunes cartoons ever and I'v seen just about everyone in my lifetime. It was puzzled by the comments of one of the reviewers saying it lacked imagination. I was quite an imaginative spoof of the old radio show and later game show (hosted by Bob Barker)known as "Truth or Consequences." The similar parallel has ridiculous questions being asked for which there can be no answer. The difference with sadistic host Daffy is that the contestant (hapless Porky) is brutually tortured (in rather innovative ways)with everything from boulders, safes and hammers to the use of dynamite, buzzsaws and even a gorilla. This is hilarious stuff and a must see for Looney Tunes fans.