NOTE IMDb
8,0/10
1,2 k
MA NOTE
Un récit basé sur les faits de citoyens ordinaires qui se sont retrouvés arrêtés et emprisonnés sans aucun motif d'inculpation pendant des semaines lors de la Crise d'octobre en 1970 au Québ... Tout lireUn récit basé sur les faits de citoyens ordinaires qui se sont retrouvés arrêtés et emprisonnés sans aucun motif d'inculpation pendant des semaines lors de la Crise d'octobre en 1970 au Québec.Un récit basé sur les faits de citoyens ordinaires qui se sont retrouvés arrêtés et emprisonnés sans aucun motif d'inculpation pendant des semaines lors de la Crise d'octobre en 1970 au Québec.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 3 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Sophie Clément
- Ginette Lavoie
- (as Sophie Clement)
J. Léo Gagnon
- L'épicier
- (as J-Léo Gagnon)
Avis à la une
This movie is not about action, it is not about special effects, it is about injustice. The persons portrayed in this movie did not die, nor did they suffer tremendous pain. But, for no valid reason, their liberty was taken from them because of the law instated to counter terrorist acts happening during "la crise d'octobre". You cannot compare this movie to a war film because it isn't, neither can it be compared to a drama because it is not that either. It is made in a documentary structure, sometimes showing us the people involved, sometimes, showing us the impressions of the actors playing them, and how they were disturbed by the whole idea.
This movie is based on testimonies of people detained without recourse during the crisis of October 1970. This film is meant as a reminder for everyone that, as much a government can be civilized, as much it can abuse its power to protect itself with fear.
If you watch this movie, do not expect twists and turns, do not expect violence, do not expect special effects... do not expect anything but humanity. The mere fact that someone can be deprived from freedom, even just for a few days, can leave a sour taste. I don't think this movie was made to be a statement, but rather to be disturbing, as the events it tells.
This movie is based on testimonies of people detained without recourse during the crisis of October 1970. This film is meant as a reminder for everyone that, as much a government can be civilized, as much it can abuse its power to protect itself with fear.
If you watch this movie, do not expect twists and turns, do not expect violence, do not expect special effects... do not expect anything but humanity. The mere fact that someone can be deprived from freedom, even just for a few days, can leave a sour taste. I don't think this movie was made to be a statement, but rather to be disturbing, as the events it tells.
10jwer79
One of the great engaged movie of the seventies. This a real drama with its atmosphere from such a Kafka. The filming is very simple and precise. The actors are convincing and sincere. This particular way of sharing movie and documentary is very interesting and powerful. Michel Brault gave us once a cinema lesson in the University of Québec in Montréal. He told us to direct movie with the stomach, not only with the head. So I realized that even a great director like him could create through emotions more than spirit. So feel the movie and you'll discover soon enough what you understood through the movie. For every person who loved this movie, I recommend "Punishment Park" directed the same year by an English guy in USA, Peter Watkins. You can find this rare movie on IMDb.
This would be a compelling and scary film if it were fiction. But it is in fact, a docudrama based on the worrisome events of the Quebec crisis of 1970. Canadians adulate Pierre Trudeau but forget that he was the one who unleashed a police state on a free country. (We never learn, do we? We did it to the Ukranians in World War I, to the Japanese in World War II and now to Arabs and Muslims. But I digress.) "Les Ordres" captures the gritty reality of working class Montreal with stark black and white footage, punctuated with occasional but effective colour. It takes the unusual but also effective step of having the actors discuss the people they play within the body of the film.
I was left with an understanding of how something like the Gestapo can come about in a civilized society if police are given unfettered powers. The Quebec police and the RCMP came very close to the Gestapo model. Although there were no significant abuses outside Quebec, the law applied to all of Canada. I was a broadcaster in Toronto at the time and it was frightening to realize that for a time freedom of the press did not exist in Canada. This is a powerful and compelling work that deserves wider exposure. It also should be shown in schools as a fundamental example and a discussion starter on the importance of civil rights and the fragility of freedom.
I was left with an understanding of how something like the Gestapo can come about in a civilized society if police are given unfettered powers. The Quebec police and the RCMP came very close to the Gestapo model. Although there were no significant abuses outside Quebec, the law applied to all of Canada. I was a broadcaster in Toronto at the time and it was frightening to realize that for a time freedom of the press did not exist in Canada. This is a powerful and compelling work that deserves wider exposure. It also should be shown in schools as a fundamental example and a discussion starter on the importance of civil rights and the fragility of freedom.
It's a docudrama about five persons imprisoned for up to three weeks during the October 1970 crisis in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Based on interviews with 50 of the 450 persons arrested and ultimately released without charge following Pierre Trudeau's invocation of the War Measures Act, it tells the story of five composite characters, making extensive use of the interviews. Clermont Boudreau (Jean Lapointe) is the union steward in a weaving factory. He and his wife, Marie (Hélène Loiselle), have three school-age daughters. Dr. Jean-Marie Beauchemin (Guy Provost) heads a medical clinic. Claudette Dusseault (Louise Forestier) is a social worker. Richard Lavoie (Claude Gauthier) is unemployed but has trouble with structure.
The film begins with a quote from Pierre Trudeau about justice and a little background on the October Crisis. We then turn to interview clips and each person's life immediately before the arrests in black and white. After arrest and while in prison, the drama turns to color. We wait, as the prisoners wait, for any explanation of "Why me"? We wince at the crude and illegal behavior of some of the guards. Then we see people released without explanation or apology.
"Les Ordres" is a faint glimpse of the underside when a democracy loses its way. The film is not polished or commercial. It's not riveting drama, but it makes the viewer cringe, especially this viewer, who generally idolizes Pierre Trudeau for allowing me to come to Canada during the Vietnam War. But there's still a warning in this movie fifty years later.
The film begins with a quote from Pierre Trudeau about justice and a little background on the October Crisis. We then turn to interview clips and each person's life immediately before the arrests in black and white. After arrest and while in prison, the drama turns to color. We wait, as the prisoners wait, for any explanation of "Why me"? We wince at the crude and illegal behavior of some of the guards. Then we see people released without explanation or apology.
"Les Ordres" is a faint glimpse of the underside when a democracy loses its way. The film is not polished or commercial. It's not riveting drama, but it makes the viewer cringe, especially this viewer, who generally idolizes Pierre Trudeau for allowing me to come to Canada during the Vietnam War. But there's still a warning in this movie fifty years later.
...they took my friend away. A 16 years old high school kid whose sole mistake was going to a political rally mainly to see a performing artist. The weeks he spent in detention changed him forever. This film is a necessary testament so nobody forgets these dark times in Quebec's history.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesOfficial submission from Canada for the 1975 Academy Awards.
- GaffesWhen Richard Lavoie is arrested, officers ask him his age and birthday. He answers he's 34 and born on January 31th, 1939. This may seem inaccurate, since the events of the movie are all set in October/November 1970, which would give him 31. However, Richard Lavoie's actor, Claude Gauthier, gave in fact his own birth date and age at the time of filming. This echoes the dual aspect of the movie, when, in the documentary part of the movie, the actors gave their real life's names and personal own anecdotes. By giving his own birth date, the actor communicates that he shares the same fate as the character, that of an artist who has espoused separatism and therefore is exposed to the repression of the federal government; he could have been the one in prison, being asked about his birth date and age.
- ConnexionsEdited into La conquête du grand écran (1996)
- Bandes originalesLa Complainte de mon frère
Written by Philippe Gagnon
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 260 000 $CA (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 49min(109 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.66 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant