Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Manhattan Project

Titre original : The Manhattan Project
  • 1986
  • Tous publics
  • 1h 57min
NOTE IMDb
6,1/10
7,3 k
MA NOTE
Manhattan Project (1986)
Regarder Official Trailer
Lire trailer2:13
1 Video
24 photos
Science-fictionThrillerComédie noire

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA high school prodigy builds an atomic bomb with stolen plutonium to win the 45th National Science Fair and expose a nuclear weapons lab posing as a nuclear medical research facility in Itha... Tout lireA high school prodigy builds an atomic bomb with stolen plutonium to win the 45th National Science Fair and expose a nuclear weapons lab posing as a nuclear medical research facility in Ithaca, NY.A high school prodigy builds an atomic bomb with stolen plutonium to win the 45th National Science Fair and expose a nuclear weapons lab posing as a nuclear medical research facility in Ithaca, NY.

  • Réalisation
    • Marshall Brickman
  • Scénario
    • Marshall Brickman
    • Thomas Baum
  • Casting principal
    • John Lithgow
    • Christopher Collet
    • Richard Council
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    6,1/10
    7,3 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Marshall Brickman
    • Scénario
      • Marshall Brickman
      • Thomas Baum
    • Casting principal
      • John Lithgow
      • Christopher Collet
      • Richard Council
    • 69avis d'utilisateurs
    • 31avis des critiques
    • 61Métascore
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 1 victoire et 2 nominations au total

    Vidéos1

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:13
    Official Trailer

    Photos24

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 17
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux67

    Modifier
    John Lithgow
    John Lithgow
    • John Mathewson
    Christopher Collet
    Christopher Collet
    • Paul Stephens
    Richard Council
    Richard Council
    • Government Aide
    Robert Schenkkan
    Robert Schenkkan
    • Government Aide
    Paul Austin
    • General
    Adrian Sparks
    Adrian Sparks
    • Scientist
    Curt Dempster
    • Scientist
    Bran Ferren
    Bran Ferren
    • Lab Assistant
    Jill Eikenberry
    Jill Eikenberry
    • Elizabeth Stephens
    Cynthia Nixon
    Cynthia Nixon
    • Jenny Anderman
    Gregg Edelman
    Gregg Edelman
    • Science Teacher
    Abraham Unger
    • Roland
    • (as Abe Unger)
    Robert Sean Leonard
    Robert Sean Leonard
    • Max
    • (as Robert Leonard)
    David Quinn
    • Tennis
    Geoffrey Nauffts
    Geoffrey Nauffts
    • Craig
    Katherine Hiler
    • Emma
    Trey Cummins
    • Terry
    Steve Borton
    • Local FBI
    • Réalisation
      • Marshall Brickman
    • Scénario
      • Marshall Brickman
      • Thomas Baum
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs69

    6,17.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    6Mr-Fusion

    No subtlety to be found here, but it's not bad

    "The Manhattan Project" is a fairly entertaining movie, so long as you keep it out from under a microscope. Still, those holes are inescapable. Like how did Paul get the resources to fashion a nuclear lab? More than that, how would a high-schooler know how to handle radioactive materials? Can' really sweep that under the "he's a bright kid" rug; we're talking about resources (or maybe it's completely plausible; hell, I'm not a whiz kid). And didn't any Medatomics personnel notice that four-week-old hole in the wall? Putting that all aside, I kinda like this movie. Mostly because I'm a Lithgow fan, and the big bomb defusal scene packs some suspense. But also for superficial reasons, like Cynthia Nixon's house. And the locations, there's some pretty scenery here.

    6/10
    wappfalls5

    oddly fascinating

    I don't know why, but this movie has a strange fascination that makes me want to watch it. Not a great movie, but passable. But as far as Before They Were Stars, someone needs to realize that the highpoint of John Lithgow's career is NOT a stupid TV show about aliens. He was a big star WELL before this movie came out. He had two Oscar nominations and won an Emmy. Meanwhile, the other two known stars in this movie, John Mahoney and Cynthia Nixon were also quite well known before their TV roles, each with over 10 movies under their belts by 1986.
    rmax304823

    Hubris

    There are some things man was never meant to know. Or at least high school kids. The story is interesting in its concept: smart kid builds nuclear device and is barely saved from blowing everyone to smithereens. (Vide: "War Games".) Its execution however makes one squirm with discomfort rather than suspense. First, the acting isn't bad. John Lithgow is especially effective in his scenes with Jill Eikenberry -- a genuinely nice guy just trying to get along. The rest of the performances are adequate. But the character played by Christopher Collett is truly abrasive.

    His scientific intellect is honed to a razor edge, as we find out near the beginning when he arranges a small explosion in the lab drawer of a fellow student who is his rival in science class. Hilarious. His smugness is almost unbearable. And science is about all he's good at. He realizes that Lithgow is "hitting on my mom" (innocently enough) and resents him for it. He doesn't seem to know what an Oedipus complex is. He hasn't heard of Woodward and Bernstein. He asks, "Who's Anne Frank?", and isn't being rhetorical.

    Worst of all, he doesn't really care about his non-scientific ignorance. He's only a few steps removed from the maniac in "Pi." The plot is simply unbelievable. He may be extremely clever but unless he has some sort of PSI power as well, he could not disarm the alarm system in two shakes of a lamb's tail -- let alone unfailingly operate the complex robotic systems in the laboratory. And without so much as a previous glance at it, he knows that the inner wall of the lab can be cut with a pen knife, and he knows just where to cut it too. He may be superhuman as well.

    Radioactive plutonium is still radioactive, even without having reached critical mass, isn't it? And although rubber gloves may stop larger particles like protons, they don't provide much protection against gamma rays, do they? I may be wrong, but at least I'm willing to admit my ignorance, which is more than this egocentric showoff is able to do.

    The first time I saw this movie it was fascinating, especially the first half, not the last part, which deteriorates into a familiar pattern. But I saw it again recently and found it more irritating than anything else, because of Collett's character and because the plot was so full of holes. At least I HOPE it was full of holes. If it were so easy to throw together a nuclear weapon occupying a space the size of a trombone case, and to do so in only a few weeks, I'd hate to think of what might happen if some religious fundamentalist antimodernization Ludditic cryptolunatic saw the movie and it gave him ideas.

    The ending is a heart-warming development in which Lithgow, decides the fight the military and declares, "No more secrets", and throw open the gates to the college kids cheering outside. Right.
    8g_imdb-43

    The reason he used the RC car to steal the Plutonium

    Other reviewers have suggested they added the hole-in-the-wall laser and RC car only to add lasers & complications to the plot. But the reason is obvious to me: I'm sure there was a radiation detector at the front door, and he'd sound the biggest alarm in the place if he tried to carry it out the front.

    That said, the kid is remarkably lucky to have his plan(s) work perfectly on the first try, without much access to make the plans.

    This is a fun movie, just humorous enough and very smart, and if you always wished you were a nuclear physicist as a kid, you will enjoy it!
    8whatch-17931

    Completely ridiculous, but entertaining and even touching

    It's pretty good, well paced, with competent to even great acting.

    But the script is so ridiculous. Despite high production values, the plot is like that of a kid's cartoon.

    This film, uh, bombed badly, and I think I know why. A film with lead characters that are scientists/engineers/wunderkind is likely to appeal to that type of audience. And that's the exact audience that's not going to buy the implausibilities all over this film.

    The worst to me is when he breaks into the lab. He visited the lab once and yet on a whim he is able to completely defeat the lab's security in a VERY elaborate operation.

    However, it's still pretty charming. It doesn't take itself too seriously, it takes itself so EARNESTLY. It's kind of like Point Break in that respect- it takes a completely ridiculous high concept and treats it so respectfully, it comes out charming. It also manages to feel quite a lot like Wargames, as if it were set in the same universe, but without feeling at all like a ripoff. Basically, it feels like a well made sequel that manages to recapture most of the magic of the original., something very rare with actual sequels.

    I was around back in the day, and I do recall this being advertised kind of as a comedy. I'm pretty sure the "does anyone have a Phillips screwdriver" gag being in a trailer. Apparently it was one of those pictures that the studio either didn't understand how to market, or decided to market it as something it wasn't.

    There are some solid gags that fit in organically, like the screwdriver, uh, bit, but the, but it's certainly not remotely a comedy.

    As a reviewer noted, Paul is a genius, yet is frequently stupid about things and not in consistent ways. This is annoying but I suspect that was done because if he were truly aware of these things, he would be quite evil. He's already pretty much a sociopath.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Firstborn
    6,2
    Firstborn
    Soul Man
    5,3
    Soul Man
    Les aventuriers de la 4e dimension
    5,9
    Les aventuriers de la 4e dimension
    Projet X
    6,2
    Projet X
    Les nanas jouent et gagnent
    6,0
    Les nanas jouent et gagnent
    3 heures, l'heure du crime
    7,1
    3 heures, l'heure du crime
    Loverboy
    6,1
    Loverboy
    The Manhattan Project
    The Manhattan Project
    Tumak, fils de la jungle
    5,7
    Tumak, fils de la jungle
    Pirate Movie
    5,4
    Pirate Movie
    The Manhattan Project
    6,2
    The Manhattan Project
    Distant Thunder - L'enfer après l'enfer
    5,7
    Distant Thunder - L'enfer après l'enfer

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      The kids with science projects in the background of the science fair scenes were actual NYC middle school students with real science projects that were submitted to the NYC borough-wide science fair. These scenes were filmed over a three-day period at the Penta Hotel in NYC on 33rd St.
    • Gaffes
      Plutonium must be alloyed with another metal (usually gallium) in order to prevent forming allotropes which cause it to crack while cooling. Cracks in the pit would have significant impact in the weapon, and could result in a fizzle (non-nuclear explosion.)
    • Citations

      Dr. John Matthewson: You try to tough it out with them, they'll lock you in a room somewhere and throw away the room.

    • Connexions
      Featured in At the Movies: Ferris Bueller's Day Off/Back to School/The Manhattan Project (1986)

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ

    • How long is The Manhattan Project?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 15 avril 1987 (France)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Juguete mortal
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Suffern, New York, États-Unis
    • Société de production
      • Gladden Entertainment
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 18 000 000 $US (estimé)
    • Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 3 900 000 $US
    • Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 1 503 545 $US
      • 15 juin 1986
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 3 900 000 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 57 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Dolby Stereo
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    Manhattan Project (1986)
    Lacune principale
    By what name was Manhattan Project (1986) officially released in India in English?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.