Conversations avec la bête

Titre original : Conversation with the Beast

1996
1h 35min

NOTE IMDb

6,5/10

MA NOTE

Drama

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAn American historian (Mr Webster) comes to Berlin to visit an old man who claims to be the real Adolf Hitler and to be 103 years old. The Hitler who died in 1945, the old man says, was just... Tout lireAn American historian (Mr Webster) comes to Berlin to visit an old man who claims to be the real Adolf Hitler and to be 103 years old. The Hitler who died in 1945, the old man says, was just one of his six doubles - one for each weekday - while Hitler himself retired into a bunke... Tout lireAn American historian (Mr Webster) comes to Berlin to visit an old man who claims to be the real Adolf Hitler and to be 103 years old. The Hitler who died in 1945, the old man says, was just one of his six doubles - one for each weekday - while Hitler himself retired into a bunker below the S-Bahn tracks and married a second time. After much deliberation and identity-... Tout lire

Réalisation
- Armin Mueller-Stahl
Scénario
- Tom Abrams
- Armin Mueller-Stahl
Casting principal

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

NOTE IMDb

6,5/10

MA NOTE

Réalisation
- Armin Mueller-Stahl
Scénario
- Tom Abrams
- Armin Mueller-Stahl
Casting principal

Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro

Photos1

Avis des utilisateurs2

6,596

Avis à la une

2J. Steed

PREPOSTEROUS

Very silly if not outright preposterous film in which director/writer/actor Armin Müller Stahl shows us a 103 year old Adolf Hitler. The aim of the film is to demystify the man Adolf Hitler, but it is a good thing that Müller-Stahl explained this when it premiered as from the film itself it is never clear what Müller-Stahl tries to achieve. It is neither satirical nor thought-provoking (the film at any moment did not provoke any thought with me as I was trying to stay awake).

What is the viewer expected to do with a Hitler who shoots peas at his visitor, refuses to take his medicine and is simply annoying to the 2 people around him. Is this supposed to be funny? The conversations do not lead anywhere and certainly no laughs, also due to the fact that there is no chemistry between Muller Stahl and Robert Balaban. The film basically only concerns itself with the story idea of the 6 actors who doubled as Adolf Hitler during his life. So what? Did Müller-Stahl wanted to say that the acting of the real Hitler made the German people believe in him?

There is one moment that is is very hilarious: one of the doubles doing the Hamlet "To be or not to be" routine in Hitlerian fashion. This is a surreal moment and maybe the whole idea should have been executed in this fashion. On the other hand: where did I see this before? John Cleese as Hitler on the balcony of a house in an English suburb; Ernst Lubitsch and Jack Benny?

It seems to me that Müller-Stahl had a "hunch at a possible idea", but forgot to make it into a solid subject for a film that would have some meaning. In stead of demystifying Hitler he made a mystifying film that never is a contribution to the Hitler debate. The very good cinematography and superb set design - Hitler's Berlin bunker was duplicated in the studio - can not save this one. (2/10)

DerRooster

fictional art

In a theatrical way Armin Mueller Stahl presents here a pitiful Adolf Hitler. The story is very amusing, ironic and, in the end, tragic. Tragic in the end because of the fact that the viewer feels somehow pity, if not sympathy for the 103 year old Hitler. Throughout the movie the viewer is taken forth and back in believing that he is the real Hitler. The unexpected end pulls the viewer back into the real world to realize the hate and anger the person Hitler is producing.

Great acting, funny stories and the totally absurd characteristic of Hitler make this movie one of Armin Mueller Stahl's best ones. If not taken to seriously, the movie is great entertainment.