Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhen an anti-terrorist agent working deep undercover is slipped a drug that causes permanent memory loss, he realizes he has only 48 hours to protect his identity and save his life.When an anti-terrorist agent working deep undercover is slipped a drug that causes permanent memory loss, he realizes he has only 48 hours to protect his identity and save his life.When an anti-terrorist agent working deep undercover is slipped a drug that causes permanent memory loss, he realizes he has only 48 hours to protect his identity and save his life.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Cassandra Hepburn
- Susan Li
- (as Cassandra Hitti)
Avis à la une
The story line might be interesting. But the acting is pretty awful. Not worth the renting money. It's surprising to see Roy Sheider in such an average movie. He's probably the only reason people would rent this movie. This movie is below average, I rated it 4 out of 10.
Was I the only one who saw this pile that noticed that the ending "borrowed" several shots from the ending of The Long Kiss Goodnight by Renny Harlin? Just as Imposter borrowed several effects shots from several other sci-fi movies.
Overall, the acting was flat and the action was staged poorly. Scheider and Dina Meyer are better than this stuff, but they have to eat I guess. Plot was not too bad, but very familiar. If there is nothing else on, like Court.tv or commercials, this movie may be worth watching.
Overall, I give it 3 out of 10.
Maybe Dina Meyer should give Verhoeven a call again.
Overall, the acting was flat and the action was staged poorly. Scheider and Dina Meyer are better than this stuff, but they have to eat I guess. Plot was not too bad, but very familiar. If there is nothing else on, like Court.tv or commercials, this movie may be worth watching.
Overall, I give it 3 out of 10.
Maybe Dina Meyer should give Verhoeven a call again.
This is not only a bad movie, it is yet another scary symptom of a sick society being pandered to by an exploitive and irresponsible film industry. The plot is idiotic. As happens again and again, it is based on corrupt, all powerful government. There is endless gun play (in which nobody ever seems to hit anything)and repeated gore. There is a totally gratuitous lesbian sex scene which has absolutely no bearing on the plot. If things aren't being riddled with bullets or pushed out of windows, they're blown up in fiery explosions. Why are the Brits able to do some real nail-biters without resorting to this sort of blam-blam sensationalism. And the Americans wonder why they have a firearms problem... I am a great believer that you get what you pay for in bargain bin movies at Walmart. But I keep hoping. I paid a buck fifty for this one and would consider myself ripped off except that by replacing the erase tab, I can re-use the tape. Almost anything I record on it will be better than this vulgar, violent cinematic vomit!
I didn't notice the use of footage from Renny Harlin's movie, but I did notice the use of footage from "Narrow Margin", specifically the shootout at the cabin in the woods. The guy in the helicopter is wearing a beige suit and cowboy boots. I could swear that I have also seen another movie that used this footage as well. The movie is extremely low budget and shows it. The acting and directing are all fairly unremarkable which is strange considering the talented cast. Perhaps this just points up the importance of a good script. No matter how talented the actor or the director is the story and dialog are uninteresting, so is the movie.
This was very bad. Vry bad. Very bad.
The only worthwhile actor in this was Dina Meyer - and luckily for her, hopefully she got paid.
The script was stupid with too many unbelieveabilities and incompetent moves.
Very bad continuity and story structure.
It also featured a lead actor - William McNamara who looked like he was going to bust out in tears at any moment.
When your lead character looks like they are about to cry all the time, maybe it's time to get another actor who won't shed tears after they read the script.
But then, anybody reading this script would probably want to cry - it's that bad.
Dina, no doubt had bills to pay - so sadly she took it, but it is so far beneath her.
This gets two stars - just for having Dina Meyer in the film - anything aside of that is not worth the second star.
The only worthwhile actor in this was Dina Meyer - and luckily for her, hopefully she got paid.
The script was stupid with too many unbelieveabilities and incompetent moves.
Very bad continuity and story structure.
It also featured a lead actor - William McNamara who looked like he was going to bust out in tears at any moment.
When your lead character looks like they are about to cry all the time, maybe it's time to get another actor who won't shed tears after they read the script.
But then, anybody reading this script would probably want to cry - it's that bad.
Dina, no doubt had bills to pay - so sadly she took it, but it is so far beneath her.
This gets two stars - just for having Dina Meyer in the film - anything aside of that is not worth the second star.
Le saviez-vous
- GaffesOn the chess board shown at the beginning (and then again later in the movie) the main character promotes the pawn to a knight which both he and the computer claim is a checkmate for black. It isn't a checkmate, since white can then take the knight with the bishop. There is a mate in three for black (rook to g2, white is forced to move the king into the corner, rook to a1, white is forced to interpose the bishop, rook takes bishop = checkmate)
- ConnexionsEdited from Le seul témoin (1990)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée1 heure 28 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant