Deviant Obsession

I have two very major complaints regarding this film.

1. That my local rental store shelved what is very clearly a soft core porn in the "suspense" category. (Had I known what it was, I would not have wasted my time renting it in the first place. And yes, this movie is a soft core porn.)

2. The title has nothing to do with the movie. No one in this movie does anything that is either deviant or obsessive, let alone a combination of the two.

Actually, make that three major complaints:

3. That I for some reason watched the movie long enough to discover point number two on this list. Boy do I regret that. Stay away from this movie. Learn from my mistake. This movie is valueless on virtually every level.

This flick is sterling example of the state of erotic B-movies: bad porn movies without the hardcore sex. The plot in this one isn't so bad as these things go; it involves a female lawyer trying to prove her lover is innocent of killing his wife. The rest of the movie, however, leaves something to be desired. Bad acting, bad direction, bad looking woman, bad sets, bad cinematography, bad sound and bad sex scenes. The filmmakers should learn the difference between raunchy and erotic. They don't even have the common sense to have Gabriella Hall naked or in a love scene.

How dumb is that?

A nicely done thriller with plenty of sex in it. I saw it on late night TV. There are two hardcore stars in it, Lauen Montgomery and Venus. Thankfully, Gabriella Hall has just a small part.

This is an erotic B-movie made to fit within the TVMA Rating. The plot has a female lawyer try to prove her lover is innocent of killing his wife. As usual with TVMA, the plot gives way to stretches of erotica that will fit within the Rating, and the characters are played by former porn stars who now work in films that just simulate sex.

Although the scenes seem at times to be disjointed from the story line, this is overall good example of TVMA Rated fare. I was happy with the effort put into scene transition attempting to reduce the disjointed scene transitions typical of these movies, and with the size of the cast that allowed for more plot development than typical.

I swear, after seeing this film for 40 minutes, I got bored real fast. Another Marc Greenberg production (who seems to churn these out quite often, no one who watches softies has gone long without seeing one of his babies), we get to see a film with man-made babes having "philosophical discussions" right out of the box. I really hate films in which they just queue to the "philosophical discussions" without any foreplay or stripping/kissing. The story about a lawyer and a man who seems to be having a day similar to Tom Hanks' character from "Bonfire Of The Vanities" was a yawner with poor acting, a lame, cheesy script, and unattractive hard-stuff refugees. I would have liked it more if Gabby Hall had more to do with it, she's the only one in the cast with a modicum of talent. Poor effort from 2002.