En 2032, Batô, un détective cyborg de l'unité antiterroriste, Section 9 de la sécurité publique, enquête sur le cas d'une femme robot, créée uniquement pour le plaisir sexuel, coupable d'avo... Tout lireEn 2032, Batô, un détective cyborg de l'unité antiterroriste, Section 9 de la sécurité publique, enquête sur le cas d'une femme robot, créée uniquement pour le plaisir sexuel, coupable d'avoir massacré son propriétaire.En 2032, Batô, un détective cyborg de l'unité antiterroriste, Section 9 de la sécurité publique, enquête sur le cas d'une femme robot, créée uniquement pour le plaisir sexuel, coupable d'avoir massacré son propriétaire.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Stars
- Récompenses
- 6 victoires et 8 nominations au total
- Batou
- (voix)
- Togusa
- (voix)
- Ishikawa
- (voix)
- Kim
- (voix)
- Koga
- (voix)
Avis à la une
Visually Stunning, Brain Recommended But Not Required
The thing is, this is not a stupid film by any means. 'Visually stunning,' it is constantly called, but it's not just that: It's an assault on the senses (in a good way), both visually and aurally. The sound is incredible, the images stick with you. Even a simple, seemingly underthought image like the final two shots of the movie will stick with you long after the closing credits roll.
But how is the story? I haven't seen the original in years, but this one held my attention, and kept my brain engaged. I remember not liking the first one when I first saw it (too many scenes of nothing moving, while we listened to voice-over), but I give this one an enthusiastic thumbs up, plus a wink and a smile. It FEELS like the middle chapter in a story... there is too much left unresolved, and while seeing the first one isn't necessary to understanding this one, there ARE many references the original "Ghost in the Shell." It's not so much a continuation of the story, as it is a continuation of the characters. Which I think is the better call.
Constant quotes from literature is not a sign of intellectual weakness, I don't think. People accuse the movie of not having a brain of its own, but I think any movie that engages the brain of its audience needn't make apologies. This one remains interesting on all levels; I just hope it doesn't take them another nine years to produce part three.
10/10
Amazing
Constant rhetorical statements within the film make you think which is very refreshing.
Nothing whatsoever to do with the first film, which i am a fan of, but isn't improvement a good thing? Who wants to see a rewritten film anyway? Look elsewhere for films like that, I'm thinking Cruel intentions 1, 2 & 3 etc etc etc I might even like this more than 'Akira', but ill see if i manage to watch Innocence another 14 times and still love it...
I would highly recommend this film to anyone, not just Anime/Manga fans.
Strong sequel that stands on its own
The ideas of the story are genuinely original, and thoroughly conceived. I don't think I've ever seen a science fiction film that was as true to the real spirit of the genre as this pair; Japan in general seems to take science fiction much more seriously than any western film-culture, and so out of Japan we get real, serious attempts to tell science-fictional stories, filled with real ideas and real characters, instead of the Bat-Durstonized monstrosities we get in the west.
For me, the integration of 2D and 3D elements was jarring; but the story stands on its ideas and the strength of its plot.
A visually stunning journey through ethics and philosophy of artificial intelligence.
Visually Revolutionary, Even if the Plot is Murky
I'm finding it hard to express what I feel about this film. Visually this film pushes animation and visual story telling to new places. I know that some of the look of this film can be found in video games but never has the current state of art on many levels been brought together to rattle, nay destroy, the cage of the status quo. Much of this film had my jaw hanging open, often with tears welling up at the beauty of the imagery. This film rocks and then some. The computer generated worlds of Immortel and Sky Captain are blown away by the magic worked here.
The plot is too murky. Frankly, I was lost half way into the movie as to what the plot was, however I was seriously getting off on the visuals and most of all the ideas that were being batted about. How do we know whats real and what isn't? This film makes it very clear that we can never know, nor can we know what it is to be alive. Certainly not all of it works but enough does, and all I can say is wow.
I have no idea how to adequately rate this film. I'm sure some people will find it form over substance and others will think little of the visuals. Me they rocked my world and I gave it a 9 out of 10, but I'll add that your mileage may vary.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis is the first ever anime film to be nominated for the Palme d'Or in the Cannes International Film Festival in 2004. It is the 6th animated film to enter the competition at Cannes.
- GaffesDuring the forensics examination, one of the computer screens misspells "research" as "RESAERCH".
- Citations
Major Motoko Kusanagi: We weep for a bird's cry, but not for a fish's blood. Blessed are those with a voice. If the dolls also had voices, they would have screamed, "I didn't want to become human."
- ConnexionsFeatured in Animation Lookback: Top 10 Best Animated Sequels (2011)
- Bandes originalesFollow Me
Performed by Kimiko Itô
Written by Herbert Kretzmer and Hal Shaper (as H. Shaper)
Composed by Joaquín Rodrigo (as J. Rodrigo)
Arranged by Kenji Kawai
Meilleurs choix
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 2 000 000 000 JPY (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 1 334 074 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 317 722 $US
- 19 sept. 2004
- Montant brut mondial
- 10 288 232 $US
- Durée
- 1h 40min(100 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1





