Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAunt Mei's famous homemade dumplings provide amazing age-defying qualities popular with middle-aged women. But her latest customer - a fading actress - is determined to find out what the sec... Tout lireAunt Mei's famous homemade dumplings provide amazing age-defying qualities popular with middle-aged women. But her latest customer - a fading actress - is determined to find out what the secret ingredient is.Aunt Mei's famous homemade dumplings provide amazing age-defying qualities popular with middle-aged women. But her latest customer - a fading actress - is determined to find out what the secret ingredient is.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 3 victoires et 3 nominations au total
- Old Hair Dresser
- (as Wong Sum-yeung)
- Li's Maid
- (as Pauline Lau)
- Mr. Li
- (as Tony Ka-fai Leung)
- Mei's Nurse Friend
- (as Wu Wai-man)
- Wang
- (as Ho Chak-man)
- Kate's Mother
- (as Wong So-fun)
- High Society Woman 1
- (as Ho Fung-chuk)
- High Society Woman 2
- (as Chan Wai-ling)
- High Society Woman 3
- (as Pang Hoi-kwan)
- High Society Woman 4
- (as Yeung Suk-hing)
- High Society Woman 5
- (as Mary Yeung)
- High Society Woman 6
- (as Mary Poon)
Avis à la une
Dumplings is such a movie. It portrays a young (sort of) woman: 'aunt' Mei, who earns her living making dumplings that rejuvenate the eater, effectively giving him or her eternal youth, as long as they are regularly eaten. Now the catch is in the 'special ingredient'. I won't reveal what this secret ingredient is (although it becomes clear very early in the movie) but it is one of the sickest ingredients that I have ever seen, read about or heard of. The unique feature of this movie is that it is able to utilize this horrible element without becoming a movie that is either simply disgusting (like 'Braindead') or slapstick (such as 'Ichi the Killer'). On the contrary, it is actually a quite funny story about the interaction between Mei and her clients and about their increasing dependence on her dumplings.
But what makes the movie really worth it ( to me, at least) is social commentary that it includes. The real issue is not the 'special ingredient' of the dumplings, but the fact that people are so desperate for 'youth' that they're willing to do everything for it. In a society totally focused on the external norms (like wealth, beauty, and appearance) it is no surprise that the internal norms (like law, morals and compassion), atrophy and get discarded like a snake discards his old skin. This externalization of norms, however, is not criticized or punished, but rather advocated (by the film, not necessarily by its maker) as natural and acceptable, indeed inevitable. It is this highly subversive and thought-provoking element of the film that makes it truly worthwhile.
My only experience with Fruit Chan was "Public Toilet." It was a very successful movie for me. It sketched an open world unending quests, open characters, like we find in life. The forces we see are those of death postponed, recycled. Sure, it introduced a coprophagiac mermaid and such notions, but the thing had a kind of life; elements passed by one another and through and by these motions it defined life.
So imagine my expectation for this project that combines such a promising a filmmaker with the most interesting cinematographer working today. Doyle has the ability to create an inner animation, a pulse of the retina's veins, within the vision of the filmmaker if he has a vision.
But this project has a closed world. Its a simple narrative, completely unlike "Toilet," except for being unreal. Less so but in the same magical direction. There are three main characters: a wealthy man, his aging wife (a former actress), and a sort of magical witch doctoress who serves up the dumplings that reverse aging. (Actually, it merely enhances the body for sex, an interesting substitute.)
The story actually matters here: we have to invest in these characters, where the "Toilet" characters were tokens, moving bits of a larger machine. So we expect the story to give value as a story. It doesn't. What it does is set up a few scenes: three athletic sex scenes, one abortion and the penultimate scene which is intended to be the most disturbing. But because we have no human connection to the thing it loses the effect.
There's one interesting device. Lots of energy is spent in hearing the eating of the dumplings. We also hear the noises of bodies joining. Its quite shocking explicit, and obviously deliberate as the sex scenes are staged in such a way that there is less to watch than film convention usually provides, so you notice this sound. They are pretty much the same, the dumplings and the copulation.
Ted's Evaluation -- 2 of 3: Has some interesting elements.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesSpawned from the short "Dumplings" from the Asian cross-cultural trilogy 3 Extrêmes (2004). Includes the same director and star.
- Gaffes(at around 1h 5 mins) In the bath scene where Mrs. Li is sobbing whilst watching the drama. The crying doesn't match up with the movements of the body/head and mouth.
- Citations
Mei, the cook: [first lines]
Mei, the cook: Mrs. Li? You're so beautiful.
Mrs. Li: They say your dumplings are the most expensive.
Mei, the cook: Of course! Please come in.
- ConnexionsEdited from 3 Extrêmes (2004)
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Dumplings?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 763 552 $US
- Durée
- 1h 31min(91 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1