Dans un futur inexploré, deux âmes endurcies se rencontrent et s'affrontent avec ce qu'elles ont fait et ce qu'elles sont devenues.Dans un futur inexploré, deux âmes endurcies se rencontrent et s'affrontent avec ce qu'elles ont fait et ce qu'elles sont devenues.Dans un futur inexploré, deux âmes endurcies se rencontrent et s'affrontent avec ce qu'elles ont fait et ce qu'elles sont devenues.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Avis à la une
Saw this at the wonderful Sun Theatre in Yarraville. The highlight was the movie being introduced by Ivan and Hugo. I really wanted to like it because they were both great but... I didn't.
I enjoyed the Hong Kong backdrop and most of the visuals and sound but really didn't dig the story (or lack of).
Ivan indicated that he did everything when he made this movie, maybe he should get some outside input in his next project.
I left the movie confused.
I enjoyed the Hong Kong backdrop and most of the visuals and sound but really didn't dig the story (or lack of).
Ivan indicated that he did everything when he made this movie, maybe he should get some outside input in his next project.
I left the movie confused.
Honestly I didn't mind watching this film, but with the talent he had and the clearly substantial budget, it was unfortunate in many ways. Aside from the almost painfully unoriginal nature of the story, I just kept thinking one thought over and over. A middle-aged man, a young beautiful woman and an older man. How many times have I seen this same scenario? Too many.
I rarely write review for films but, as an Australian filmmaker, I had to. Someone has to be honest and call it out when one of our Australian films, for a lack of better word, sucks.
In summary, it was bad. It gave nothing for the audience to hang onto, maybe except for some mediocre low budget VFX visuals. So with the slow pace and nothing to go for, it was excruciating to sit through the film keeping an open mind that it might get better, which it didn't. I was cringing as they whisper talked to each-other through the whole film, as if that would give their dialogue more depth. But there was not depth in the content of the dialogue.
While in Australia it is celebrated as another great work of Ivan Sen (actually he is a very good filmmaker), there are many flaws that should have been seen even in the screenplay, especially by those who gave the funding and support to the film. The biggest flaw was; why would the audience care for Jack? He is loser, not relatable, and he kills random people for a living, and he's not very good at it either. I could care less if he died from his condition (whatever his condition was).
I could go on and on, but I want to wrap it up with one question; 'Why does this movie need to exist?'. And the answer is it doesn't.
With all that negative, I know the director is fund of sci-fi genre, so I hope this was a great practice so his next sci-fi film will not suffer the same flaws.
In summary, it was bad. It gave nothing for the audience to hang onto, maybe except for some mediocre low budget VFX visuals. So with the slow pace and nothing to go for, it was excruciating to sit through the film keeping an open mind that it might get better, which it didn't. I was cringing as they whisper talked to each-other through the whole film, as if that would give their dialogue more depth. But there was not depth in the content of the dialogue.
While in Australia it is celebrated as another great work of Ivan Sen (actually he is a very good filmmaker), there are many flaws that should have been seen even in the screenplay, especially by those who gave the funding and support to the film. The biggest flaw was; why would the audience care for Jack? He is loser, not relatable, and he kills random people for a living, and he's not very good at it either. I could care less if he died from his condition (whatever his condition was).
I could go on and on, but I want to wrap it up with one question; 'Why does this movie need to exist?'. And the answer is it doesn't.
With all that negative, I know the director is fund of sci-fi genre, so I hope this was a great practice so his next sci-fi film will not suffer the same flaws.
This film tries to be deep and meaningful with a distinct Blade Runner skyline interspersed with real, busy street scenes. It just fails to ignite, the story isn't clear, Weaving is under used and the male lead has to be the most scruffy, miserable SOB i've ever come across.
His mumbling frustrates as do the extended scenes where nothing happens, without even minimal (poor) dialogue to break it up.
The girl has the sort of face that'll get work and , no doubt she can act.
Hugo was doing his bit for Oz, that's fair enough, the other two leads need to dust themselves off and try again.
His mumbling frustrates as do the extended scenes where nothing happens, without even minimal (poor) dialogue to break it up.
The girl has the sort of face that'll get work and , no doubt she can act.
Hugo was doing his bit for Oz, that's fair enough, the other two leads need to dust themselves off and try again.
The pacing is excruciatingly slow. The movie has very little dialog, plot or action. Kwanten talks in a half whisper both in his voice-over and dialog. It's really quite a boring movie. It shares a lot of characteristics with Lost in Translation.
My verdict - pass
If you decide to watch it and you happen to play it on VLC video player on Windows then run it at 108% speed.
My verdict - pass
If you decide to watch it and you happen to play it on VLC video player on Windows then run it at 108% speed.
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsReferences Blade Runner (1982)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Expired?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 27 150 $US
- Durée1 heure 42 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant