Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueDisaster strikes when teenage Cody becomes the victim of a grain entrapment accident.Disaster strikes when teenage Cody becomes the victim of a grain entrapment accident.Disaster strikes when teenage Cody becomes the victim of a grain entrapment accident.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Its refreshing to see a movie dedicated to a way of life I would never see. The movie packs a lot of action into 77 minutes leaving me with a new appreciation for the risks involved getting that delicious popcorn to this consumers hand.
I'm so happy to finally see a movie that takes a serious dive into the real life of farming and the real dangers that are associated with farming. Best movie I've seen in a while.
Grain entrapment is a dire, deadly, urgent emergency, as illustrated in various films over the years but most of all documented in real life cases. To build a film based simply on that scenario is a curious notion, but the inherent drama is ripe for storytelling possibilities. 'Silo,' such as it is, is a mixed bag.
In the depiction of the entrapment, and the rescue process, the movie feels in large part like a simple dramatization. We see steps undertaken to save the trapped boy, and the way it all becomes a community effort. Disagreements in how best to go about the procedure reflect a disparity of specific knowledge and lack of communication, elements which are undoubtedly real enough. The central narrative thrust is the strength of 'Silo,' and the movie would have greatly benefited from focusing purely on this aspect.
Unfortunately, that's not what we get. A straightforward, plainspoken story of disaster and rescue would have been compelling, without any need for embellishment. Instead we're also presented with glimpses at the lives of all the characters, back story, and the low-down on their various interpersonal histories and conflicts. 'Silo' could have been a low-key, forthright, human interest thriller, but every bit of extra flair, intended to add greater sense of drama, only waters down what the film could have been. That goes for the score, dialogue, superfluous character writing - almost everything beyond the crucial core.
There's really just not much more to say. I didn't have any particular expectations before watching, yet I find myself somewhat flummoxed. I understand the compulsion, the trend of dressing up a story with the idea of making it ever more dramatic and impactful for audiences. But balance is required, and too many features tip the scale to become overwrought. This is one of them. A far less refined cut of no more than half the final runtime would actually have been twice as absorbing. Sometimes less is more.
'Silo' isn't altogether bad, and I do hope other viewers get more out of it than I did. I just wish film-makers would take time to step back and consider what is truly most essential to the tale they want to tell.
In the depiction of the entrapment, and the rescue process, the movie feels in large part like a simple dramatization. We see steps undertaken to save the trapped boy, and the way it all becomes a community effort. Disagreements in how best to go about the procedure reflect a disparity of specific knowledge and lack of communication, elements which are undoubtedly real enough. The central narrative thrust is the strength of 'Silo,' and the movie would have greatly benefited from focusing purely on this aspect.
Unfortunately, that's not what we get. A straightforward, plainspoken story of disaster and rescue would have been compelling, without any need for embellishment. Instead we're also presented with glimpses at the lives of all the characters, back story, and the low-down on their various interpersonal histories and conflicts. 'Silo' could have been a low-key, forthright, human interest thriller, but every bit of extra flair, intended to add greater sense of drama, only waters down what the film could have been. That goes for the score, dialogue, superfluous character writing - almost everything beyond the crucial core.
There's really just not much more to say. I didn't have any particular expectations before watching, yet I find myself somewhat flummoxed. I understand the compulsion, the trend of dressing up a story with the idea of making it ever more dramatic and impactful for audiences. But balance is required, and too many features tip the scale to become overwrought. This is one of them. A far less refined cut of no more than half the final runtime would actually have been twice as absorbing. Sometimes less is more.
'Silo' isn't altogether bad, and I do hope other viewers get more out of it than I did. I just wish film-makers would take time to step back and consider what is truly most essential to the tale they want to tell.
To ryan-11985 you must not be a grain farmer with storage on the farm or an emergency responder because if you tie a rope around him and pull him up, you will pull him in two and kill him. The weight of grain in an entrapment is unbelievable. Farmers die every year from this very thing because they get in a hurry, because farmer's work is never done, and those who survive all say the same thing, "I knew better". Farmers are the backbone of this country and it's wonderful to see a movie that is realistic and shows the dangers of being a farmer. #proudtobeafarmer #proudtobeafirstresponder.
Watched it in Decatur Illinois and couldn't believe how well it moved. Not a soul there pulled out their phone or looked away.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThere aren't any silos to be seen in the movie, rather a very large grain bin, and a very real risk.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Silo?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 643 996 $US (estimé)
- Durée1 heure 16 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant