NOTE IMDb
7,2/10
1,7 k
MA NOTE
L'étrange histoire de Mikhail Khodorkovsky, autrefois considéré comme l'homme le plus riche de Russie, qui atteignit la prospérité dans les années 1990, fut emprisonné et devint un martyr im... Tout lireL'étrange histoire de Mikhail Khodorkovsky, autrefois considéré comme l'homme le plus riche de Russie, qui atteignit la prospérité dans les années 1990, fut emprisonné et devint un martyr improbable du mouvement anti-Poutine.L'étrange histoire de Mikhail Khodorkovsky, autrefois considéré comme l'homme le plus riche de Russie, qui atteignit la prospérité dans les années 1990, fut emprisonné et devint un martyr improbable du mouvement anti-Poutine.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 7 nominations au total
Avis à la une
This documentary gives a general history of Russia from 1991, the fall of the Soviet Union, through the turbulent 1990's and the rise of the oligarchs, to 2018, after a couple of decades of Vladimir Putin progressively asserting an iron grip over the country. Citizen K is Mikhail Khodorkovsky, one of those oligarchs and a man who came in to direct conflict with Putin when he began looking into politics and espousing democratic ideals. He was shipped off to a remote prison for a decade as a result, and speaks from London where he went after being released. While the documentary skates along and doesn't go incredibly deep, it communicates the events and the dynamic between the two men and those around them reasonably well. Its use of archival footage and interviews is solid, though offset by a soundtrack that's overly dramatic and annoying.
Khodorkovsky was a predatory capitalist and while he ironically became a better person in prison, I think director Alex Gibney should have asked him point blank about his possible involvement in the murder of a local politician in 1998, as well as pointed questions about his vast wealth. For example, Khodorkovsky points out a time when he "had" to force workers to take a 30% pay cut, and another time when he let tens of thousands of them go. The question is not put to him, gee Mikhail, at the time you were worth over $1B and along with six other guys had half of Russia's wealth; if you cared for these people why didn't you take these losses out of your massive profits? Too often we see him get away with smirking through his statements and painting himself in a positive light, even if I am happy that he now leads the Open Russia movement and is a staunch critic of Putin. In the film's defense, the fact that Russia was torn between oligarchs like him and the monster that is Putin, men who combined corruption and violence to preserve wealth and power, does comes through. The dynamics are suitably depressing, particularly when you see the parallels to other countries in the behavior of the ultra-wealthy, or political strongmen who stir up nationalism as one of their methods of attaining power.
Khodorkovsky was a predatory capitalist and while he ironically became a better person in prison, I think director Alex Gibney should have asked him point blank about his possible involvement in the murder of a local politician in 1998, as well as pointed questions about his vast wealth. For example, Khodorkovsky points out a time when he "had" to force workers to take a 30% pay cut, and another time when he let tens of thousands of them go. The question is not put to him, gee Mikhail, at the time you were worth over $1B and along with six other guys had half of Russia's wealth; if you cared for these people why didn't you take these losses out of your massive profits? Too often we see him get away with smirking through his statements and painting himself in a positive light, even if I am happy that he now leads the Open Russia movement and is a staunch critic of Putin. In the film's defense, the fact that Russia was torn between oligarchs like him and the monster that is Putin, men who combined corruption and violence to preserve wealth and power, does comes through. The dynamics are suitably depressing, particularly when you see the parallels to other countries in the behavior of the ultra-wealthy, or political strongmen who stir up nationalism as one of their methods of attaining power.
Watching this documentary was like having a deja-vu. Im romanian and living in an ex comunist country, we experienced the same savage so called capitalism in the '90s. Politicians in cahoots with some "smart" guys were able to "seize" a country. Im not pretending to be familiar with Khodorkovsky's affairs but i cant help not see some similarities for both Romania and Russia's. They were bribing, stealing or better said leeching the state's wealth. So before taking any sides on this production dig a little more on the '90s in Eastern Europe's transition economy from state owned to a market economy. These men werent saints
I literally had great difficulty hearing and understanding the soft spoken BBC reporter because the background music was so loud and intrusive.
This is a very disturbing trend in documentaries. Background music shouldn't override the actual content! Knock it off!
Otherwise, the documentary was very informative and avoided schizophrenic choppy cuts, which sadly are also trendy.
This is a very disturbing trend in documentaries. Background music shouldn't override the actual content! Knock it off!
Otherwise, the documentary was very informative and avoided schizophrenic choppy cuts, which sadly are also trendy.
It is interesting to witness how Putin's paranoia disproportionately grew with each passing year - from waging war against his opponents and critics, to a full scale aggression against another country. Great archival footage. The only problem is the overbearing soundtrack, at times so loud that it completely muffles the dialogue.
This is a great template to understand what is happening in America with the Biden Administration. Biden is very similar to Boris Y.. When Biden dies, resigns, or gets re-elected, it's a perfect setup for a Democrat dictator, through another set of rigged elections.
Like Putin, if Biden gets re-elected, passes the Presidency, or Kamala gets elected, then it's a sure thing that America is toast, along with much of the world.
Most intelligent people saw this coming with Obama, but hoped that they were wrong. Obama was just the first stepping stone, and Biden is 10 steps.
I respect what Citizen K did, and the world needs more people like him.
Like Putin, if Biden gets re-elected, passes the Presidency, or Kamala gets elected, then it's a sure thing that America is toast, along with much of the world.
Most intelligent people saw this coming with Obama, but hoped that they were wrong. Obama was just the first stepping stone, and Biden is 10 steps.
I respect what Citizen K did, and the world needs more people like him.
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsFeatures 12 stulev (1977)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Citizen K?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 120 411 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 10 571 $US
- 24 nov. 2019
- Montant brut mondial
- 145 941 $US
- Durée2 heures 6 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant