La reine du crime présente: les meurtres de minuit
Titre original : Agatha and the Midnight Murders
- Téléfilm
- 2020
- 1h 31min
NOTE IMDb
5,5/10
2,8 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAs bombs fall on London, writer Agatha Christie considers selling a manuscript that will kill off her most famous creation.As bombs fall on London, writer Agatha Christie considers selling a manuscript that will kill off her most famous creation.As bombs fall on London, writer Agatha Christie considers selling a manuscript that will kill off her most famous creation.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
If this wasn't badged as an Agatha Chistie, it still would be a rambling poorly acted mish mash. We were actually looking forward to the ad breaks. Plodding along with a scattering of swear words, 3rd rate jokes and violent deaths doesn't make an Agatha Christie murder 'mystery'.
I'll give points for the idea, because they could have actually gone somewhere with this storyline. Instead what we got was an uninspiring mess with flaccid characters and an uneven plot. It made it far too obvious who the villain was, you didn't even have to guess. It was just awful. Poor Agatha, they did her dirty. Poor woman must be turning in her grave.
Somehow I got a third of the way through this debacle of a movie before I realised I may totally lose the will to live if I watched a second more.
Helen Baxendale, totally miscast, did the best she could with the abysmal script, but could do nothing to improve it. The rest of the characters did nothing but annoy, and the acting in general was amateurish. The supposed comic moments were unfunny and embarrassing and the suspense was conspicuous by its absence. The occasional bad language seemed way out of character and the actual story was about as interesting as fishing.
I regret every second I wasted on this - even the time spent writing this frigging review!
What a waste of effort.
I have been generous giving it 2 stars.
Watch this at your own peril.
The opening credit/scene was so unnecessarily gruesome, I nearly turned it off right then and there. But I needn't have worried about that...it had absolutely nothing to do with the rest of the movie. I can't imagine what they were thinking it achieved.
Mind due, if I had turned it off I might have saved myself a few hours of watching mediocre nonsense.
It had the standard formula for a Christie, but that's where the similarities ended. There was very little in the way of mystery, clues or detection and rather just sudden murders, finger pointing and an ongoing manhunt.
I didn't mind some of it, but it the twists were a bit wild.
Mind due, if I had turned it off I might have saved myself a few hours of watching mediocre nonsense.
It had the standard formula for a Christie, but that's where the similarities ended. There was very little in the way of mystery, clues or detection and rather just sudden murders, finger pointing and an ongoing manhunt.
I didn't mind some of it, but it the twists were a bit wild.
Well, it's easy to see why the world wants more and more Agatha Christie - and here we have some fairly good fan fiction. Good acting and fairly good dialog. Though, here I have a slight problem with F-bombs being dropped here and there. Fortunately beeped out on PBS. Not really the sort of language one would expect Agatha Christie to use. At least the graphic set scenes that seem all to common in New adaptations has been left out. Though there is one or two scenes of some gore, but, seriously, if you've called Agatha Christie's novels "cozy" you haven't been paying attention. Pretty good plot twist. It'll pass in the dark if you give it a shove. OR, you could return to David Suchet as Poirot.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe spy novel referenced is "N or M?" which was published in 1941. After publication, she was investigated by MI5 because the character Major Bletchley shared a name with the code-breaking center Bletchley Park. When asked about the name, she replied "Bletchley? My dear, I was stuck there on my way by train from Oxford to London and took revenge by giving the name to one of my least lovable characters."
- GaffesGrace says Agatha is "richer than the queen", but it is 1940 and King George VI is the monarch. That does not make it a goof. There was also a queen at the time: Queen Elizabeth.
- Citations
Sir Malcolm Campbell: If she's Agatha Christie, I'm the Emperor of Japan.
- Crédits fousDisclaimer before end credits: "This film has not been endorsed, licensed or authorised by the estate of Agatha Christie or by Agatha Christie Limited."
- Bandes originalesHitler Has Only Got One Ball
Performed by Blake Harrison and cast
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Agatha and the Midnight Murders
- Lieux de tournage
- Corinthia Palace Hotel and Spa, San Anton, Malte(hotel interiors)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h 31min(91 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant