NOTE IMDb
4,5/10
5,3 k
MA NOTE
Six étrangers se réveillent piégés dans un champ de maïs sans fin pour découvrir que quelque chose de mystérieux les chasse.Six étrangers se réveillent piégés dans un champ de maïs sans fin pour découvrir que quelque chose de mystérieux les chasse.Six étrangers se réveillent piégés dans un champ de maïs sans fin pour découvrir que quelque chose de mystérieux les chasse.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Not as bloody as Saw. Not as clever as Cube. Not as inventive as Escape Room. Not a good film.
Badly directed and edited, bad script, stupid ending, 'seen it all before' plot, mostly poor acting.
The black actress wins an award for the most annoying person in film...ever.
Avoid.
Badly directed and edited, bad script, stupid ending, 'seen it all before' plot, mostly poor acting.
The black actress wins an award for the most annoying person in film...ever.
Avoid.
I don't understand the people who down vote new movies immediately.
I had a fun time and didn't make an instant connection to movies that I already love, such as "Cube".
This is worth watching, great acting and mystery. An hour in, I had assumptions, but didn't know exactly where it was going.
I've had more fun watching Escape the Field than big "blockbusters" recently. The only exception I can make, was watching Elvis (2022).
The only rotten tomatoes I see, are the early reviews! Too many people rate movies with ridiculously low scores. I'd probably rewatch this movie again. Here is my personal rating system for movies:
1-Won't watch again 2-Horrible, but I've seen worse 3-Didn't like it, may have something decent 4-Bad, but not terrible 5-Indifferent 6-Good, I might rewatch it 7-Solid, probably going to it watch again 8-I liked it, will watch again 9-Loved it, will recommend and watch again 10-Favorite of all time, will watch again and again and again and again and again.
I had a fun time and didn't make an instant connection to movies that I already love, such as "Cube".
This is worth watching, great acting and mystery. An hour in, I had assumptions, but didn't know exactly where it was going.
I've had more fun watching Escape the Field than big "blockbusters" recently. The only exception I can make, was watching Elvis (2022).
The only rotten tomatoes I see, are the early reviews! Too many people rate movies with ridiculously low scores. I'd probably rewatch this movie again. Here is my personal rating system for movies:
1-Won't watch again 2-Horrible, but I've seen worse 3-Didn't like it, may have something decent 4-Bad, but not terrible 5-Indifferent 6-Good, I might rewatch it 7-Solid, probably going to it watch again 8-I liked it, will watch again 9-Loved it, will recommend and watch again 10-Favorite of all time, will watch again and again and again and again and again.
An interesting and promising idea. Enjoyed the basic puzzle aspect of this at first. There were a few mildly predictable twists, some jump scares but the acting is kinda annoying and bad, the CGI effects laughable, but worst of all is the frustrating and unsatisfying ending that doesn't provide any explanation or answer any questions.
Basically felt like if Cube (1997) or Saw (2004) were set in a cornfield and not as good.
Basically felt like if Cube (1997) or Saw (2004) were set in a cornfield and not as good.
Ever seen the Canadian cult sci-fi thriller Cube?
How about Netflix's adaptation if the Stephen King story In The Long Grass?
Well, imagine the story of the first, but the setting of the second. That is what you have here.
And that's it. There's nothing new, nothing imaginative; just "Cube, but in a field".
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't bored at all, but everything just seemed too familiar. But there were other problems.
Some parts where painfully predictable. Others where the most over-played of clichés (the ex-soldier still haunted by how he let his platoon down, anyone?).
At one point, a character makes reference to something they couldn't have known about. It seems like a really clumsy hint that this character is not to be trusted, but it's never followed up, so why include it? Either the film-makers thought it was a clever way of second guessing the audience (it's not, because it makes things even more nonsensical) or they were not aware of their own continuity.
How about the "Impassable door" that totally blocks our heroes, only for one of them very shortly later to pass through (off camera and without any explanation or reference) with no apparent difficulty. Twice!
As I said, despite all the criticisms, I can't claim I wasn't entertained. The pace was good, and the acting largely fine (though a few of the characters were so 2D they would hardly have been missed however well acted).
It's just that, at best, it offered nothing new and, at worst, fell prey to all manner of clichés and plot-contrivences.
How about Netflix's adaptation if the Stephen King story In The Long Grass?
Well, imagine the story of the first, but the setting of the second. That is what you have here.
And that's it. There's nothing new, nothing imaginative; just "Cube, but in a field".
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't bored at all, but everything just seemed too familiar. But there were other problems.
Some parts where painfully predictable. Others where the most over-played of clichés (the ex-soldier still haunted by how he let his platoon down, anyone?).
At one point, a character makes reference to something they couldn't have known about. It seems like a really clumsy hint that this character is not to be trusted, but it's never followed up, so why include it? Either the film-makers thought it was a clever way of second guessing the audience (it's not, because it makes things even more nonsensical) or they were not aware of their own continuity.
How about the "Impassable door" that totally blocks our heroes, only for one of them very shortly later to pass through (off camera and without any explanation or reference) with no apparent difficulty. Twice!
As I said, despite all the criticisms, I can't claim I wasn't entertained. The pace was good, and the acting largely fine (though a few of the characters were so 2D they would hardly have been missed however well acted).
It's just that, at best, it offered nothing new and, at worst, fell prey to all manner of clichés and plot-contrivences.
I could tell after watching the trailer this film had the potential to be pretty bad. But because I like some of the actors I decided to give it a shot. Bad idea..That was a total waste of time. About an hour in I couldn't take anymore and turned it off. Dont make the mistake I did. Watch something else.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesActress Elena Juatco said this was one of the first productions to be able to get up and going after the pandemic hit because it was filmed outside and there were only six cast members.
- Crédits fousThere is a mid-credits scene.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Escape the Field?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- El campo de la muerte
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 1 074 879 $US
- Durée1 heure 29 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant