LOLA
- 2022
- 1h 19min
NOTE IMDb
6,4/10
3,5 k
MA NOTE
1940, Thom et Mars ont construit une machine, LOLA, capable d'intercepter les émissions de radio et de télévision du futur.1940, Thom et Mars ont construit une machine, LOLA, capable d'intercepter les émissions de radio et de télévision du futur.1940, Thom et Mars ont construit une machine, LOLA, capable d'intercepter les émissions de radio et de télévision du futur.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 6 victoires et 10 nominations au total
Cha Cha Seigne
- Lola Hanbury
- (as Chacha Seigne)
Avis à la une
Mercifully, 'found footage' has not been overused by the major production houses. That allowed this gem to slip in to the main stream with its imaginative story line and cinematic style. It will become a cult classic, But writing that is facile and is almost harmful to my review. The characters other than the 2 sisters were deliberately underplayed, in my opinion. This allowed the emphasis to be on the story's development of what started as a fun invention (lots of wine and to hell with the consequences). The story line (and the terrific acting by the 2 sister- characters) twisted its way into a darker place. What I found most fascinating about the director is what a great story teller he is. All the while we were cheering on the successes of the British military heroes, who were fighting against a fascist enemy - while elements within the military were developing fascist traits of their own. I think that some of the critics did a disservice to the movie by over-emphasizing the relevant of the punk movement in the future, to the main story-line..
Odd little found footage film. These kinds of films tend to be a mixed bag, to put it mildly, but this one is a little bit inventive taking place in the past with two women who invent a mechanism that can see into the future and at first it's great fun. However, they then see a war coming and they interfere and it changes events as is usually the case when one plays around with time. While this is a little unusual and well acted, it's also extremely illogical, but you can have some fun with it if you don't take it too seriously. This is an ultra low budget film that has two very good female leads in Stefanie Martini & Emma Appleton who are both new to me. I also thought Rory Fleck Byrne. This is super short!
.
.
I'll pass on all the comments both positive and negative about this film and address just one sci-fi issue that some reviewers either scoff at or enjoy, receiving future broadcasts.
Off air broadcasting seems to be deemed a thing of the past early television, given cable delivery streaming and the now almost defunct vcr, dvd etc.
But original tv broadcasting went out into the airwaves on a variety of variable a frequency transmissions. Any signal sent out theoretically would enter the atmosphere and conceivably pass into space.
Given travel at the speed required to "catch" those signals in space, any original broadcast from any time sent to air could be received in the future creating the ability to look back in time, not forward.
Mind boggle. Love sci-fi as it becomes reality more and more.
Off air broadcasting seems to be deemed a thing of the past early television, given cable delivery streaming and the now almost defunct vcr, dvd etc.
But original tv broadcasting went out into the airwaves on a variety of variable a frequency transmissions. Any signal sent out theoretically would enter the atmosphere and conceivably pass into space.
Given travel at the speed required to "catch" those signals in space, any original broadcast from any time sent to air could be received in the future creating the ability to look back in time, not forward.
Mind boggle. Love sci-fi as it becomes reality more and more.
Love a good time conundrum, though most are a bit of a letdown.
This, however, was a bit of fun, and I did appreciate the obvious effort put into both the genuine Newsreel edits and the prop-builds.
Not surprisingly, there's a bit of "It's the 40's" pomposity, but that seems to be a common denominator of many period films.
A few anachronisms (namely using a camera which was not released until 1952, and which was as noisy as a chaff-cutter!), but overall, a bit of fun.
Annoying as they were, the characters fit the found-footage stage play feel quite convincingly, particularly the character of the soldier who discovers where they are.
Clever, and not reliant on grandiose effects (which tend to put me off...).
Worth a look, when you have a free hour or two.
This, however, was a bit of fun, and I did appreciate the obvious effort put into both the genuine Newsreel edits and the prop-builds.
Not surprisingly, there's a bit of "It's the 40's" pomposity, but that seems to be a common denominator of many period films.
A few anachronisms (namely using a camera which was not released until 1952, and which was as noisy as a chaff-cutter!), but overall, a bit of fun.
Annoying as they were, the characters fit the found-footage stage play feel quite convincingly, particularly the character of the soldier who discovers where they are.
Clever, and not reliant on grandiose effects (which tend to put me off...).
Worth a look, when you have a free hour or two.
Caught this at the 75th EIFF, very clever and inventive piece of micro-budget SF, presented almost as documentary using footage discovered in old movie reel tins in a deserted house in England, purporting to document a pair of eccentric sisters created Lola, a machine which can intercept. Broadcasts from the future. It starts as fun, but as the war comes to Britain, Lola's trajectory changes radically.
Some of the film was shot on period cameras, developed in a rougher way to give the impression of damaged old film reels, while other footage uses newsreels, edited to include characters (a la Forrest Gump) or events, while the story also brings into play the nature of personal responsibility and the potential consequences of interfering with history. In many ways it reminded me of Primer, now a cult film, which I first saw at the same film festival years ago.
Some of the film was shot on period cameras, developed in a rougher way to give the impression of damaged old film reels, while other footage uses newsreels, edited to include characters (a la Forrest Gump) or events, while the story also brings into play the nature of personal responsibility and the potential consequences of interfering with history. In many ways it reminded me of Primer, now a cult film, which I first saw at the same film festival years ago.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFilmed using genuine pre-war cameras and black and white film, which even though coloured film was available in the period, it would have been too expensive for ordinary budgets to afford.
- GaffesIn Thom's discussion with Cobcroft it's implied that U-boats travel underwater and surface in order to attack. It's actually the opposite. WWII era subs ran mostly on diesel, which needed to be vented to the outside, and stayed on the surface most of the time. They only submerged when they were about to attack, running on comparatively limited battery power.
- ConnexionsFeatures Woodstock (1970)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Lola?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Lola
- Lieux de tournage
- Angleterre, Royaume-Uni(archive footage, world war two)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 206 037 $US
- Durée1 heure 19 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 4:3
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant