Toby Fleishman savait à quoi s'attendre lorsque lui et sa femme depuis près de 15 ans se sont séparés : des week-ends et un jour férié sur deux avec les enfants, et des négociations sur la c... Tout lireToby Fleishman savait à quoi s'attendre lorsque lui et sa femme depuis près de 15 ans se sont séparés : des week-ends et un jour férié sur deux avec les enfants, et des négociations sur la coparentalité.Toby Fleishman savait à quoi s'attendre lorsque lui et sa femme depuis près de 15 ans se sont séparés : des week-ends et un jour férié sur deux avec les enfants, et des négociations sur la coparentalité.
- Nommé pour 7 Primetime Emmys
- 2 victoires et 19 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
I've seen a lot of the bad reviews and not to sound too moldy but I get the feeling it's the younger folks. Us olds in our 30s and 40s get the neverending question of what if? Which is why I think you need to be a little seasoned to truly enjoy this series. You needed to have lived life and gone through things to take in all this show is giving. Missing your youth, your freedom and possibilities. Being the age where you are too young to stop dreaming but too old to begin again. Wondering if you've chosen the right path, right career, right spouse, or if you were meant to be a parent. You're missing old friends, old neighborhoods, and old apartments. The writing in this show is nothing short of amazing and completely captures the thoughts spiraling in every mind of a millennial/gen x adult.
I started watching this because I love Claire Danes. After a couple episodes, I was ready to give it up: the episodes were meandering and mediocre, at best, and Danes was barely even in it. Then, I saw someone mention episode 7 and how amazing Danes' performance was. I decided to persevere.
The first six episodes were quite a slog of upper middle class navel gazing. I kept wondering what purpose the story really served. Did we really need to know about these people and their boring, privileged lives? I think that it was well acted, but the focus on Toby seemed a poor choice: he was the least interesting character in the series, to me. Episode 6 picked up a little, so I was hopeful about episodes 7 & 8.
Episode 7 was one of, if not the, best hours of television I've watched this year. Claire Danes was riveting. I related so much to her character. Just phenomenal. Episode 8, which focused on Libby was also very, very good. Both episodes together were a profoundly moving look at middle age for us younger Gen Xers.
I really wish the first 6 episodes had been condensed into 3. I also think Claire Danes and Adam Brody were criminally underutilized. If you can slog through the start, the payoff of episodes 7 & 8 is worth it.
The first six episodes were quite a slog of upper middle class navel gazing. I kept wondering what purpose the story really served. Did we really need to know about these people and their boring, privileged lives? I think that it was well acted, but the focus on Toby seemed a poor choice: he was the least interesting character in the series, to me. Episode 6 picked up a little, so I was hopeful about episodes 7 & 8.
Episode 7 was one of, if not the, best hours of television I've watched this year. Claire Danes was riveting. I related so much to her character. Just phenomenal. Episode 8, which focused on Libby was also very, very good. Both episodes together were a profoundly moving look at middle age for us younger Gen Xers.
I really wish the first 6 episodes had been condensed into 3. I also think Claire Danes and Adam Brody were criminally underutilized. If you can slog through the start, the payoff of episodes 7 & 8 is worth it.
10mrfrane
There are legitimate complaints in the reviews about how much the story revolves around Fleishman, the man in the divorce. But it's a story that unfolds over time. There are multiple characters at the core of the story and they each have arcs to play out. I, for one, was fascinated to see how my perspective changed as each episode played out and the point of view shifted, and there were revelations. Oh, boy, were there revelations.
Put it this way, whoever produced this program did not spend all that money on Claire Danes to have her be defined by everyone else. And keep an eye on Meara Mahoney Gross, who plays the Fleishmans' young daughter.
Put it this way, whoever produced this program did not spend all that money on Claire Danes to have her be defined by everyone else. And keep an eye on Meara Mahoney Gross, who plays the Fleishmans' young daughter.
There are a few for whom this will not be their cup of tea. But for me this is one of the best shows I've seen in a long time. It is thought provoking and rich on several levels. Its main achievement is to get the viewer to sympathize with then later become cold towards certain characters. The subjectivity of perception is examined. I was reminded how quick we are to judge. The narrator and most quotable is Libby. As Libby says later, people are not necessarily good or bad but are complicated with elements of both., as we learn by walking in their shoes. Clair Danes and Lizzy Caplan both give incredible performances. I see awards being given. Strongly recommend.
This is an amazing series. It is well-acted, well-cast, well-written, and well-directed. There's a lot to this series that should actually warrant a trigger warning for those who have been through family trauma, divorce, severe mental health issues, misogyny, sexual harassment, work trauma, people treating each other like garbage, death etc. It's difficult to list everything that happens in this series without giving spoilers, but it is anxiety-inducing, and traumatic, because the entire series is basically watching trauma in action and the history of that trauma. That being said, again, it is excellent, in it's craft - but for me, it will be a one time watch.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDuring a January 2023 interview with Tonya Mosley on the National Public Radio program Fresh Air, Taffy Brodesser-Akner confirmed that many of the main cast members were chosen at least partly because they were actors who had been well-known as teens and who were now middle-aged: "It was so intentional. It was--you know, there was this idea that these actors were too young to play these roles. I mean, Jesse Eisenberg, when we started talking about the adaptation, was only 36 years old. Luckily--and I mean that facetiously--the pandemic came along, and by the time. . . . [filming started, he was] 38--so we were able to rationalize that. But we had these choices. Did we want to cast people who were older who we could then look at as in a more authentic crisis of middle age? But the point of the book and the show are the beginnings of those crises. And also, this allowed us to have them play themselves in flashbacks. But most of all . . . if I don't, as a 40-year-old, yet understand what is happening to me in my life, the idea that Jesse Eisenberg--yes, from The Squid And The Whale, yes, from The Social Network--that it's happening to him, too, that it's happening to Claire Danes from My So-Called Life, that it's happening to--oh, my gosh--to Adam Brody [from The O.C.], to Lizzy Caplan [from Mean Girls], to Josh Radnor--all these people that we knew so well as very, very young people. It hits home for me so much to say, oh, my God, this is a force you cannot fight--if you're lucky. If you're lucky and you get to live, this is a force that you won't be able to fight. We're all going to get old."
- ConnexionsFeatured in Half in the Bag: 2022 Catch-up Part 2 (2023)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Fleishman Is in Trouble have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Fleishman Is in Trouble
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 48min
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant