Enys Men
- 2022
- 1h 36min
NOTE IMDb
5,6/10
4,1 k
MA NOTE
Se déroulant en 1973 sur une île de la côte des Cornouailles, des observations quotidiennes d'une fleur rare se transforment en un voyage métaphysique qui force le spectateur à s'interroger ... Tout lireSe déroulant en 1973 sur une île de la côte des Cornouailles, des observations quotidiennes d'une fleur rare se transforment en un voyage métaphysique qui force le spectateur à s'interroger sur ce qui est réel et ce qui est un cauchemar.Se déroulant en 1973 sur une île de la côte des Cornouailles, des observations quotidiennes d'une fleur rare se transforment en un voyage métaphysique qui force le spectateur à s'interroger sur ce qui est réel et ce qui est un cauchemar.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 9 nominations au total
Morgan Val Baker
- The Boatman
- (non crédité)
Amanda Rawling
- Bal Maiden
- (non crédité)
Dion Star
- The Boatman
- (non crédité)
Isaac Woodvine
- The Boatman
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
This is an almost entirely single-handed, dialogue free, story of a woman who is taking (very basic) climate and wildlife data on an otherwise uninhabited island off the Cornish Coast. Clearly this has been a mining island in days gone by, with ruins and mine-workings strewn around the place and those exude a sort of creepiness that is only augmented by the constant wind and the sound of the waves crashing against the rocks. Her days are routine, to say the least, but gradually we start to realise that the island has been touched by tragedy - as has the woman (Mary Woodvine) herself. Auteur Mark Jenkin doesn't rush with this, but rather takes his time to slowly but surely allow us to put together some of the pieces of just what drew this woman to this isolated and lonely spot. It's that repetitive pacelessness that I struggled with. We see the same shots over and over again, the same procedures and scenarios and though there is a very incremental development of the plot, the whole thing just doesn't really move. It has the hallmarks of an original "Poldark" episode married with the "Dr. Who - Stones of Blood" series from 1978. To be fair, it has a very authentic 1973 feel to it, and the audio mixing coupled with some sparingly used visual effects do help create a very slight air of mystery and tragedy, but I found it all just a bit lacking. Worth a watch though, but I'm not sure I will watch it again.
I watched this in a quite full small cinema in Blaenau Ffestiniog. I live horror, love independent cinema and really love independent British cinema.
However my goodwill can't detract from this one being a bit of a pretentious stinker. As an aside I hope 'Bait' isn't like 'Enys Men'.
I just could not get into it. This might have something to do with having to sit through half an hours worth of abstract art-film beforehand. But regardless, the story, the motivation of 'Enys Men' is completely shrouded in unnecessary mystery. Yes, to give it its due the viewing was incredibly intense, almost unbearable but without any payoff. The ending doesn't tie up the loose ends, which I quite like as a narratorial device but frustrated me on this occasion.
However my goodwill can't detract from this one being a bit of a pretentious stinker. As an aside I hope 'Bait' isn't like 'Enys Men'.
I just could not get into it. This might have something to do with having to sit through half an hours worth of abstract art-film beforehand. But regardless, the story, the motivation of 'Enys Men' is completely shrouded in unnecessary mystery. Yes, to give it its due the viewing was incredibly intense, almost unbearable but without any payoff. The ending doesn't tie up the loose ends, which I quite like as a narratorial device but frustrated me on this occasion.
An infuriatingly dull and frustrating watch which seems to hint at lots of interesting ideas that don't develop in any way. I loved bait and while this uses a similar aesthetic it lacks anything approaching a story, character development or depth. It's also mind numbingly repetitive.
I see other reviews saying that people might not "get" what this film is really about or saying. If that's the case then gods sake please enlighten us on what there is to understand rather than smugly pontificating. I feel like in reality it's not a lot. And if it requires some prior understanding of 'Cornish culture' to understand what's going on then sorry, I don't realise I had to revise before I watched it.
I see other reviews saying that people might not "get" what this film is really about or saying. If that's the case then gods sake please enlighten us on what there is to understand rather than smugly pontificating. I feel like in reality it's not a lot. And if it requires some prior understanding of 'Cornish culture' to understand what's going on then sorry, I don't realise I had to revise before I watched it.
On an island there's a woman you will find, she has strange habits and she's losing most her mind, strange flowers keep her busy, cascading stones may make you dizzy, into a void that one assumes, was sometimes mined. She has a scar across her midriff from a cut, it went quite deep and nearly opened up her gut, along the mark she's growing lichen, perhaps she's rather over ripened, on the horizon, a strange rock protrudes and juts. On occasion she receives a man in boat, we find out later that he's buoyant and can float, although he clearly cannot swim, or make the most of his four limbs, as he's puffed up showing signs of a great bloat.
Imaginative stuff, but a little too abstract.
Imaginative stuff, but a little too abstract.
This is mostly a response to these depressing reviews. Have you never watched a moody film before?
You should already know from Bait that Jenkin is an experimental filmmaker. It's an unconventional film which is about experiencing a mood and atmosphere. The film won't spoon feed you the same storytelling tropes you've already seen a million times before, so if that makes a film "bad" to you then stay away. Don't try to understand it, just watch it.
I much preferred this to Bait. I liked the sound design, the blurring of nightmare and reality and the body horror elements.
What's he got against lichen, though?
You should already know from Bait that Jenkin is an experimental filmmaker. It's an unconventional film which is about experiencing a mood and atmosphere. The film won't spoon feed you the same storytelling tropes you've already seen a million times before, so if that makes a film "bad" to you then stay away. Don't try to understand it, just watch it.
I much preferred this to Bait. I liked the sound design, the blurring of nightmare and reality and the body horror elements.
What's he got against lichen, though?
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesA hand double was used to write in the log book throughout the film. Mary Woodvine claimed her writing was deemed 'not up to scratch' at a Q&A in London.
- Citations
The Preacher: And now descends the Night of Sin!
- ConnexionsFeatured in Horrible Reviews: The Horrors Of 2023: Enys Men | Video review (2023)
- Bandes originalesKan Me
Written and Performed by Gwenno
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Enys Men?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Кам'яний острів
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 189 579 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 74 781 $US
- 2 avr. 2023
- Montant brut mondial
- 583 364 $US
- Durée1 heure 36 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant